HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE EVALUATION SCALES IN LATE-LIFE MAJOR DEPRESSION

2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 1022-1029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Goldney ◽  
Laura J. Fisher ◽  
David H. Wilson ◽  
Frida Cheok

Objective: The objective of this study is to describe health services utilisation and morbidity, including health-related quality of life, in those with major depression in a random and representative sample of the population. Method: Data were gathered in a Health Omnibus Survey of the South Australian population. Major depression was delineated on the basis of responses to the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Information about use of health services and absence from usual functioning was collated, and two measures of health-related quality of life, the Short-form Health Status Questionnaire and the Assessment of Quality of Life were also administered. Results of those with major depression were compared with those who had other depressive syndromes and those who had no depression. Results: Those with major depression reported significantly greater use of all health services and poorer functioning in terms of carrying out their normal duties. Similarly, their health-related quality of life was significantly poorer than those with other depressive syndromes, which in turn was significantly poorer than those who were not depressed. Only one-fifth of those with major depression were currently taking antidepressants. Conclusions: These results are consistent with international studies. In addition to the potential for alleviating the depressive symptomatology of individuals, it is evident that even a modest improvement in functioning with appropriate treatment would have the potential to benefit the Australian community by one billion dollars a year.


2000 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. A371
Author(s):  
Paolo Usai ◽  
Luigi Minerba ◽  
Roberto Ariu ◽  
Barbara Marini ◽  
Roberta Cossu ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 185 (5) ◽  
pp. 416-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Godelief R. W. M. Willemse ◽  
Filip Smit ◽  
Pim Cuijpers ◽  
Bea G. Tiemens

BackgroundSub-threshold depression is a prognostic variable for major depression. Interventions in sub-threshold depression may prevent the onset of new cases of major depression.AimsTo examine the effects of minimal-contact psychotherapy in primary care patients with sub-threshold depression on the onset of major depression, on the reduction in depressive symptoms and on health-related quality of life.MethodWe conducted a randomised trial in primary care, in which patients screened for sub-threshold depression were randomly assigned to minimal-contact psychotherapy (n=107) or to usual care (n=109).ResultsOne year after baseline, the incidence of major depressive disorder was found to be significantly lower in the psychotherapy group (12%) than in those receiving usual care (18%). Small but significant effects were also found on depressive symptoms and on aspects of health-related quality of life.ConclusionsPrimary care patients with sub-threshold depression can benefit from minimal-contact psychotherapy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 327-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Dudley-Brown ◽  
Arpita Nag ◽  
Cory Cullinan ◽  
Mary Ayers ◽  
Steve Hass ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn Cody ◽  
Jan-Niklas Kreppke ◽  
Johannes Beck ◽  
Lars Donath ◽  
Anne Eckert ◽  
...  

Introduction: Major depression is a psychiatric disease associated with physical inactivity, which in turn affects mental and physical health. A randomized controlled trial is being implemented to facilitate physical activity in people with major depression. In March 2020, Swiss state authorities temporarily legislated a lockdown to contain the Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), which influenced health, behavior and research. The aim of this study was to find out whether data gathered before and during/after the lockdown among in-patients with major depression differ with regard to psychosocial health, physical activity and related attitudes and to establish whether baseline data have been affected by the lockdown.Methods: This is a cross-sectional analysis within a randomized controlled trial. Physically inactive, adult in-patients diagnosed with major depression were recruited from four Swiss psychiatric clinics between January 2019 and December 2020. Psychosocial health was measured with questionnaires pertaining to stress, sleep and health-related quality of life. Physical activity was measured with the Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire. Explicit attitudes were measured with seven questionnaires pertaining to physical activity-related motivation and volition. Implicit attitudes toward physical activity were captured with a single target implicit association test.Results: The sample consisted of 165 participants (n = 119 before lockdown, n = 46 during/after lockdown). No statistically significant differences were found between in-patients with major depression assessed before and during/after the COVID-19 lockdown with regard to psychosocial health (stress, p = 0.51; sleep, p = 0.70; physical component of health-related quality of life, p = 0.55; mental component of health-related quality of life, p = 0.64), self-reported physical activity (p = 0.16) and explicit as well as implicit attitudes toward physical activity (p = 0.94). Hence, the COVID-19-induced lockdown seems not to have led to group differences.Conclusion: Baseline data gathered in in-patients suffering from major depression who are physically inactive upon admission to in-patient treatment in Switzerland seem to be unaffected by the COVID-19-induced lockdown. To assess changes in said population regarding psychosocial health and physical activity patterns over time, longitudinal data are needed.


2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (19) ◽  
pp. 9315-9326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adriano Tramontano ◽  
Mario Scala ◽  
Mario Magliulo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document