An Approach for Supplier Selection for Construction Companies Through Analytical Hierarchy Process

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 177-179
Author(s):  
Bhavik K Daxini ◽  
◽  
Prof. (Dr.) R.B. Bhatt Prof. (Dr.) R.B. Bhatt ◽  
Prof. Jayeshkumar Pitroda
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Construction Companies ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Hierarchy Process

scholarly journals A Study of Multicriteria Decision Making for Supplier Selection in Automotive Industry

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Jamil ◽  
Rosli Besar ◽  
H. K. Sim
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Automotive Manufacturing ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Hierarchy Process

This paper is designed to present the effectiveness of group multicriteria decision making in automotive manufacturing company focusing on the selection of suppliers in Malaysia. The process of selecting suppliers is one of the most critical and challenging endeavor in any supply chain management. There are five decision making tools being analyzed in this study, namely, analytical hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS), and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process integrated with fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (FAHPiFTOPSIS). The scores of ranking among the suppliers in each MCDM tools (AHP, FAHP, TOPSIS, FTOPSIS, and FAHPiFTOPSIS) show significantly comparable variation. Scores of the best supplier is then compared to the lowest supplier for all MCDM tools whereby this reflects that the highest percentage goes to TOPSIS with scoring of 79.37%. On the contrary, FAHPiFTOPSIS demonstrated the lowest score variation of 22.42% which indicates that FAHPiFTOPSIS is able to eliminate biasness in supplier selection process.

Prioritization criteria for enterprise resource planning systems selection for civil construction companies: a multicriteria approach

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (8) ◽  
pp. 855-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirian Picinini Méxas ◽  
Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas ◽  
Helder Gomes Costa
Keyword(s):  
Enterprise Resource Planning ◽  
Resource Planning ◽  
Erp Systems ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Construction Companies ◽  
Enterprise Resource Planning Systems ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Criteria Importance ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Technology Specialists

In this study, as a first step, a set of criteria and subcriteria was proposed for enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems selection for companies in the civil construction industry that is based on a review of the literature concerning the application of multicriteria models for evaluating ERP systems. Subsequently, after validation of these criteria by a group of information technology specialists, a field survey was developed based on the administration of a questionnaire and the use of the analytic hierarchy process. This survey enabled us to perform an analysis of the judgment consistency of the 11 respondents who participated in this study and to capture their perceptions of criteria importance. The survey revealed that respondents considered the software criterion to be the most important and showed the importance of subcriteria within groups of criteria, which greatly contributed to the decision-making process in ERP systems selection.

scholarly journals Implementasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) untuk Evaluasi Pemasok Daging Sapi (Studi Kasus: Restoran Nominomi Delight, Jakarta)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 380
Author(s):  
Fadhilah Hanifah ◽  
Elpawati Puspi Eko Wiranthi
Keyword(s):  
Performance Appraisal ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Performance Index ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Quality Cost ◽  
Supplier Performance ◽  
Priority Order ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The purpose of this research is to develop a performance appraisal method to get the priority order of four restaurant beef suppliers based on the weight of the selection criteria and by showing the indicators of each criterion, using the Vendor Performance Index and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. There are seven main criteria for assessing supplier performance, namely quality, cost, delivery, flexibility, responsiveness, solutions, and relationships which are then translated into thirty-eight sub criteria or indicators. With the AHP method, weights obtained from the seven criteria in the order of quality (0.371), cost (0.256), delivery (0.101), solution (0.078), flexibility (0.070), responsiveness (0.069), and relationship (0.055). The results of supplier selection based on the AHP method obtained the weight in the order of priority of suppliers, namely PT Sukanda Djaya (0.377). PT Indoguna Utama (0.349). Santosa Agrindo (0.146), and Amino Meat (0.128).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document