scholarly journals Supplier Selection Analysis of Polypropylene Using Analytical Hierarchy Process In Global Izupolyndo

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adhitomo Wirawan
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Selection Analysis ◽  
Hierarchy Process

An Approach for Supplier Selection for Construction Companies Through Analytical Hierarchy Process

2012 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 177-179
Author(s):  
Bhavik K Daxini ◽  
◽  
Prof. (Dr.) R.B. Bhatt Prof. (Dr.) R.B. Bhatt ◽  
Prof. Jayeshkumar Pitroda
Keyword(s):  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Construction Companies ◽  
Selection For ◽  
Hierarchy Process

scholarly journals A Study of Multicriteria Decision Making for Supplier Selection in Automotive Industry

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia Jamil ◽  
Rosli Besar ◽  
H. K. Sim
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Multicriteria Decision Making ◽  
Ideal Solution ◽  
Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Automotive Manufacturing ◽  
Multicriteria Decision ◽  
Hierarchy Process

This paper is designed to present the effectiveness of group multicriteria decision making in automotive manufacturing company focusing on the selection of suppliers in Malaysia. The process of selecting suppliers is one of the most critical and challenging endeavor in any supply chain management. There are five decision making tools being analyzed in this study, namely, analytical hierarchy process (AHP), fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (FAHP), technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (FTOPSIS), and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process integrated with fuzzy technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (FAHPiFTOPSIS). The scores of ranking among the suppliers in each MCDM tools (AHP, FAHP, TOPSIS, FTOPSIS, and FAHPiFTOPSIS) show significantly comparable variation. Scores of the best supplier is then compared to the lowest supplier for all MCDM tools whereby this reflects that the highest percentage goes to TOPSIS with scoring of 79.37%. On the contrary, FAHPiFTOPSIS demonstrated the lowest score variation of 22.42% which indicates that FAHPiFTOPSIS is able to eliminate biasness in supplier selection process.

scholarly journals Implementasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) untuk Evaluasi Pemasok Daging Sapi (Studi Kasus: Restoran Nominomi Delight, Jakarta)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 380
Author(s):  
Fadhilah Hanifah ◽  
Elpawati Puspi Eko Wiranthi
Keyword(s):  
Performance Appraisal ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Performance Index ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Quality Cost ◽  
Supplier Performance ◽  
Priority Order ◽  
Hierarchy Process

The purpose of this research is to develop a performance appraisal method to get the priority order of four restaurant beef suppliers based on the weight of the selection criteria and by showing the indicators of each criterion, using the Vendor Performance Index and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. There are seven main criteria for assessing supplier performance, namely quality, cost, delivery, flexibility, responsiveness, solutions, and relationships which are then translated into thirty-eight sub criteria or indicators. With the AHP method, weights obtained from the seven criteria in the order of quality (0.371), cost (0.256), delivery (0.101), solution (0.078), flexibility (0.070), responsiveness (0.069), and relationship (0.055). The results of supplier selection based on the AHP method obtained the weight in the order of priority of suppliers, namely PT Sukanda Djaya (0.377). PT Indoguna Utama (0.349). Santosa Agrindo (0.146), and Amino Meat (0.128).

Corporate Social Responsibility-Based Supplier Selection Process in Sustainable Supply Chains

2019 ◽  
pp. 155-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Xu ◽  
Xiaoran Shi ◽  
Yu Xie ◽  
Sang-Bing Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Sustainable Supply Chains ◽  
Operation Conditions ◽  
Corporate Social ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection Problem

Due to the rising importance of the global interdependence, decisions related to supplier selection rely on not only corporate operation conditions, but also corporate social responsibility (CSR). Under this circumstance, this chapter focuses on a supplier selection problem concerning CSR. Particularly, seven criteria and their corresponding importance for supplier selection are analyzed. Meanwhile, some relevant sub-criteria are included as well. Based on existing literature review and managerial interviews obtained from leaders in the southern region of India, these issues are compared and ranked. In this chapter, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is conducted to identify the importance of these considered criteria and sub-criteria. Finally, the chapter concludes with a presentation of rankings and priorities of the proposed seven criteria. Given the obtained results and recommendations, it would be helpful to establish a useful method for selecting the best supplier based on CSR.

Supplier selection in supply chain using analytical hierarchy process

2013 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anilkumar H. Maurya ◽  
B.E. Narkhede ◽  
Rakesh D. Raut ◽  
Akshay S. Shrawge
Keyword(s):  
Supply Chain ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Hierarchy Process
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document