scholarly journals Reikalavimas atlyginti nuostolius dėl piktnaudžiavimo civiliniu procesu

Teisė ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 75 ◽  
pp. 126-142
Author(s):  
Aurimas Brazdeikis
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Nature

Šiame straipsnyje autorius analizuoja reikalavimą atlyginti nuostolius, patirtus dėl piktnaudžiavimo ci­viliniu procesu (Civilinio proceso kodekso 95 str. 1 d.), bei argumentuoja, kad šis reikalavimas visų pirma yra materialinės teisinės prigimties ir pobūdžio. Atsižvelgdamas į šią išvadą, autorius aptaria su šio rei­kalavimo nagrinėjimu teisme susijusius procesinius aspektus. In this article the author analyses a claim for reimbursement of damages inflicted by the abuse of civil procedure (Article 95, paragraph 1 of Civil Procedure Code) and argues that this claim is first of all of substantive (material) legal nature and character. Based on this inference, the author considers procedu­ral aspects of dealing with it.

Commentary to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (continuation)

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-111
Author(s):  
M.R. Zagidullin ◽  
◽  
I.V. IReshetnikova ◽  
R.B. Sitdikov ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Russian Federation

La ideología tras el proyecto de Código Procesal Civil chileno

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (116) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Claudio Palavecino Cáceres
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Epistemic Function

In this essay I argue that the draft of the new Chilean Civil Procedure Code obeys a procedural publicist ideology. In keeping with it, the project assigns an epistemic function to the process; confers autonomous probative power to the judge; and weakens the principle of procedural legality. All of which shows an incongruity with the constitutional values that have prevailed in Chile until now.

To the Matter of Procedural and Legal Problems of Detaining a Person on Suspicion of Committing a Crime

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.V. Bolshakov ◽  
◽  
I.D. Nazarov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Case ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Moment

The subject of the research within the framework of the article is the criminal procedure institute for the detention of a person on suspicion of committing a crime. The legal nature of this institution is analyzed, and comments are given on the normative legal acts and judicial practice regulating the issues of detention. The theoretical basis of the research is based on the publications of the last two decades on this problem, in particular, reflecting the discussion of the process scientists S. A. Shafer, S. B. Rossinsky and A. A. Tarasov, the subject of which was the issue of the legal nature of a suspect detention in a criminal case. In the paper, the authors ask the following questions: What is the detention of a person on suspicion of committing a crime in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation? From what moment does the detained person acquire the status of a suspect? Is it possible to detain a person before initiating a criminal case? The study concludes that a person acquires the actual status of a suspect from the moment of direct detention, that is, before documenting this status and, as a result, before initiating a criminal case. Amendments to the articles of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are proposed, and the authors` versions of the definitions of the concepts «detention of a suspect», «the moment of actual detention» and «pre-trial proceedings» are given.

A autocomposição de conflitos na Câmara de Conciliação e arbitragem da Administração Federal: estudo do caso - UNIFESP x União

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-36
Author(s):  
Leila Cuéllar ◽  
Egon Moreira
Keyword(s):  
Public Administration ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
The Public ◽  
Procedure Code

The article analyses the role of the “Mediation Chambers” in the Public Administration, according to the Civil Procedure Code (2015) and the Mediation Act (2015). It examines the nature of such chambers, their operation and limits.

scholarly journals Results of the Procedural Reform of the Corporate Dispute Resolution Procedure

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 49-51
Author(s):  
Evgeniy S. Razdyakonov ◽  
◽  
Igor N. Tarasov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
General Part ◽  
Procedural Reform

The article examines some of the results of the procedural reform in terms of the resolution of corporate disputes by courts. The authors formulated four main theses that reflect the essence of this reform: the division of competence in corporate disputes between courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts, the expansion of the arbitrability of corporate disputes, the implementation of the principle of one-time consideration of a corporate dispute, the consolidation of new subjects of civil proceedings in corporate disputes not named in the general part of the Commercial Procedure Code of the RF and the Code of Civil Procedure of the RF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document