scholarly journals Algorithms in Judicial Environments – the Importance of Identifying Relevant Judicial Decision-Making Stage

Teisė ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. 55-69
Author(s):  
Donatas Murauskas
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Judicial Decision Making ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
Positive Analysis ◽  
Artificial Intelligence Systems

The paper examines the application of Artificial Intelligence systems in the judicial environments. It provides an outline of a typology of different algorithms applicable in judicial environments depending on judicial decision-making stage. This is a positive analysis which aims at identifying relevant algorithms in every judicial decision-making stage, be it assessing the facts, indicating the applicable law or deciding.

Judge v Robot? Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Decision-Making

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tania Sourdin
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Technological Change ◽  
Human Activity ◽  
Human Activities ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Judicial Decision Making ◽  
And Function ◽  
Over Time ◽  
The Way

As technology continues to change the way in which we work and function, there are predictions that many aspects of human activity will be replaced or supported by newer technologies. Whilst many human activities have changed over time as a result of human advances, more recent shifts in the context of technological change are likely to have a broader impact on some human functions that have previously been largely undisturbed. In this regard, technology is already changing the practice of law and may for example, reshape the process of judging by either replacing, supporting or supplementing the judicial role. Such changes may limit the extent to which humans are engaged in judging with an increasing emphasis on artificial intelligence to deal with smaller civil disputes and the more routine use of related technologies in more complex disputes.

scholarly journals Artificial intelligence and adjudication: some perspectives

Amicus Curiae ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 2-15
Author(s):  
David M. Masuhara
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Information Technology ◽  
British Columbia ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Judicial Decision Making ◽  
Judicial Procedure

In this article the Hon Mr Justice David M. Masuhara, Supreme Court of British Columbia, briefly explores views that would be supportive of AI in the adjudicative process and those that would not. The author starts with a brief description of judicial decision-making and AI and then identifies and discusses the views and then offers dome comments on what an AI adjudication system might look like. Index keywords: Artificial Intelligence, AI, Judicial procedure, Courts, Information technology

Principles, Procedure, and Justice

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Distributive Justice ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Forensic Evidence ◽  
Judicial Decision Making ◽  
Administration Of Justice ◽  
University College ◽  
Evidence Law

The book contains a collection of essays in civil procedure and evidence honouring Professor Adrian Zuckerman of University College Oxford. The contributors are leading scholars and judges whose work has engaged with or been influenced in some way by the work of Professor Zuckerman. The contributions touch upon a wide variety of topics, ranging from the efficient administration of justice, questions of distributive justice and the allocation of costs, the use of online facilities and artificial intelligence in the delivery of justice, judicial decision making, abuse of process, to hearsay, the use of forensic evidence, and evidence law.

Context Effects in Judicial Decision Making

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey J. Rachlinski ◽  
Chris Guthrie ◽  
Andrew J. Wistrich
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Context Effects ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Judicial Decision Making

scholarly journals Interpreting change through legal culture: the case of the Irish exclusionary rule

Legal Studies ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Claire Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Legal Culture ◽  
Macro Level ◽  
Judicial Decision ◽  
Exclusionary Rule ◽  
Judicial Decision Making ◽  
The Common ◽  
Law Of Evidence

Abstract The changes to the Irish exclusionary rule introduced by the judgment in People (DPP) v JC mark an important watershed in the Irish law of evidence and Irish legal culture more generally. The case relaxed the exclusionary rule established in People (DPP) v Kenny, one of the strictest in the common law world, by creating an exception based on ‘inadvertence’. This paper examines the decision through the lens of legal culture, drawing in particular on Lawrence Friedman's distinction between ‘internal’ and ‘external’ legal culture to help understand the factors contributing to the decision. The paper argues that Friedman's concept and, in particular, the dialectic between internal and external legal culture, holds much utility at a micro as well as macro level, in interrogating the cultural logics at work in judicial decision-making.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document