scholarly journals Towards a Better Future for Canadians with Bipolar Disorder: Principles and Implementation of a Community-Based Participatory Research Model

Author(s):  
Erin Elwood Michalak ◽  
Kathleen Lane ◽  
Rachelle Hole ◽  
Steven J. Barnes ◽  
Nasreen Khatri ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Erin E. Michalak ◽  
Kathleen Lane ◽  
Rachelle Hole ◽  
Steven J. Barnes ◽  
Nasreen Khatri ◽  
...  

The Collaborative RESearch Team to study psychosocial factors in bipolar disorder (CREST.BD) is a multidisciplinary network dedicated to advancing science and practice around psychosocial issues associated with bipolar disorder (BD), improving the care and wellness of people living with bipolar disorder, and strengthening services and supports for these individuals. CREST.BD specializes in community-based participatory research, in which research is conducted as a partnership between researchers and community members. This article describes the evolution of the CREST.BD network and CREST.BD’s commitment to community-based participatory research in bipolar disorder research. Examples of CREST.BD projects using community-based participatory research to study stigma, quality of life, psychosocial interventions, and creativity in bipolar disorder are highlighted, and opportunities and challenges of engaging in community-based participatory research in bipolar disorder specifically and the mental health field more broadly are discussed. This article demonstrates how CBPR can be used to enhance the relevance of research practices and products through community engagement, and how community-based participatory research can enrich knowledge exchange and mobilization. 


2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 9-13
Author(s):  
Francisco Trujillo ◽  
Guadalupe Melendez ◽  
Gigi Owen

When working within a community-based participatory research model, community-defined needs and desires must be at the forefront, even though researchers, students, and teachers often have individual goals for their projects and partnerships. In Ambos Nogales, most of these needs and desires are rooted in improving living conditions, with a focus on public and environmental health.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Lapadat ◽  
Anusha Balram ◽  
Joanna Cheek ◽  
Eugenia Canas ◽  
Andrea Paquette ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND We describe the methodological dimensions of community-based participatory research through a description of study design, youth engagement, and methods/processes in the cocreation of knowledge within a Canadian study, the Bipolar Youth Action Project. This collaborative partnership—carried out by a team composed of academic, community, and youth partners—was designed to investigate self-management and wellness strategies for young adults living with bipolar disorder. OBJECTIVE The aim is to describe the opportunities and challenges of this collaboration and to reflect upon the process of involving youth with bipolar disorder in health research that concerns them, and share lessons learned. METHODS The project was conducted in multiple phases over 2 years: (1) grant-writing, with youth contributing to the process; (2) recruitment, in which 12 youth were selected and trained to help shape and conduct two research forums; (3) the first research forum, where more youth were consulted about the strategies they apply to stay well (self-management strategies); (4) data analysis of Forum I findings; (5) research Forum II, which consulted youth with bipolar disorder about knowledge translation of Forum I findings; and (6) data analysis of Forum II findings. Youth peer researchers with bipolar disorder were involved in a significant capacity at every stage in the process. RESULTS Of the initial 12 youth peer researchers, 7 remained on the project from the recruitment phase until the project ended. They collaborated in the creation of two youth research forums that consulted youth with bipolar disorder on their self-management strategies. CONCLUSIONS This article shares what was learned from the process of partnering with youth with bipolar disorder in a community-based participatory research study. CLINICALTRIAL


10.2196/19475 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. e19475
Author(s):  
Laura Lapadat ◽  
Anusha Balram ◽  
Joanna Cheek ◽  
Eugenia Canas ◽  
Andrea Paquette ◽  
...  

Background We describe the methodological dimensions of community-based participatory research through a description of study design, youth engagement, and methods/processes in the cocreation of knowledge within a Canadian study, the Bipolar Youth Action Project. This collaborative partnership—carried out by a team composed of academic, community, and youth partners—was designed to investigate self-management and wellness strategies for young adults living with bipolar disorder. Objective The aim is to describe the opportunities and challenges of this collaboration and to reflect upon the process of involving youth with bipolar disorder in health research that concerns them, and share lessons learned. Methods The project was conducted in multiple phases over 2 years: (1) grant-writing, with youth contributing to the process; (2) recruitment, in which 12 youth were selected and trained to help shape and conduct two research forums; (3) the first research forum, where more youth were consulted about the strategies they apply to stay well (self-management strategies); (4) data analysis of Forum I findings; (5) research Forum II, which consulted youth with bipolar disorder about knowledge translation of Forum I findings; and (6) data analysis of Forum II findings. Youth peer researchers with bipolar disorder were involved in a significant capacity at every stage in the process. Results Of the initial 12 youth peer researchers, 7 remained on the project from the recruitment phase until the project ended. They collaborated in the creation of two youth research forums that consulted youth with bipolar disorder on their self-management strategies. Conclusions This article shares what was learned from the process of partnering with youth with bipolar disorder in a community-based participatory research study.


2014 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. S10-S25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra K. Kattelmann ◽  
Adrienne A. White ◽  
Geoffrey W. Greene ◽  
Carol Byrd-Bredbenner ◽  
Sharon L. Hoerr ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document