scholarly journals Low Levels of Gastrin 17 are Related with Endoscopic Findings of Esophagitis and Typical Symptoms of GERD

Author(s):  
Francesco Di Mario ◽  
Pellegrino Crafa ◽  
Marilisa Franceschi ◽  
Kryssia Rodriguez-Castro ◽  
Gianluca Baldassarre ◽  
...  

Background and Aims: In clinical practice, most patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) undergo esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (EGD), despite its low sensitivity in detecting reflux stigmata. Gastrin 17 (G-17) has been proposed to be related with GERD, due to the negative feedback between acid secretion and this hormone. We assessed the clinical usefulness of fasting G-17 serum determination for a non-invasive diagnosis of GERD in patients with typical symptoms. Methods: We consecutively enrolled patients complaining of typical GERD symptoms in two different settings: a single referral center and a primary care setting. Control groups consisted of dyspeptic patients. All subjects underwent assessment of serum levels of G-17 and EGD. Results: At the academic hospital, 100 GERD patients (n=89 with erosive esophagitis and 11 with Barrett’s esophagus) had statistically significant low levels of G-17 as compared with 184 dyspeptic patients (1.7±1.2 pg/L vs 8.9±5.7 pg/L p<0.0001). Similarly, in the primary care setting, 163 GERD patients had statistically significant low levels of G-17 as compared with 132 dyspeptic patients (0.5±0.2 pg/L vs. 4.0±2.6 pg/L, p<0.0001). Moreover, in the primary care setting, no statistically significant differences were found for G-17 levels between patients with erosive and non-erosive reflux pattern (0.4±0.2 vs 0.7±0.3; p=0.08). In primary care, the accuracy of G-17 less than 1 pg/L to diagnose non-invasively GERD was 94.3%. Conclusions: Low levels of G-17 were detected in patients with erosive esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus in a referral center and in patients with typical GERD symptoms in a sample of patients from a primary care setting.

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-307-S-308
Author(s):  
Samantha Leeds ◽  
Patricia Tiscornia-Wasserman ◽  
Antonia R. Sepulveda ◽  
Maria O'Donovan ◽  
Joel H. Rubenstein ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 158 (6) ◽  
pp. S-308-S-309
Author(s):  
Anita Chung ◽  
Catriona N. Grant ◽  
Nitasha Gajanthodi Mudalaje Bhat ◽  
Anna H. Gao ◽  
Alfred Kyrollos Kelada ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anita Chung ◽  
Anna H. Gao ◽  
Catriona N. Grant ◽  
Emily Ryan ◽  
Nitasha Bhat ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangeta Vadivelu ◽  
Zheng Feei Ma ◽  
Ean Wah Ong ◽  
Norhaliza Hassan ◽  
Nik Fariza Husna Nik Hassan ◽  
...  

Background: Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERDQ) and Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia Questionnaire (QOLRAD) are reliable tools for evaluation of GERD. Aim: We aimed to test validity and reliability of Malay language translations of GERDQ and QOLRAD in a primary care setting. Methods: The questionnaires were first translated into the Malay language (GERDQ-M and QOLRAD-M). Patients from primary care clinics with suspected GERD were recruited to complete GERDQ-M, QOLRAD-M, and Malay-translated 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36 or SF-36-M), and underwent endoscopy and 24-h pH-impedance test. Results: A total of 104 (mean age 47.1 years, women 51.9%) participants were enrolled. The sensitivity and specificity for GERDQ-M cut-off score ≥8 were 90.2 and 77.4%, respectively. Based on this cut-off score, 54.7% had a high probability of GERD diagnosis. GERD-M score ≥8 vs. < 8 was associated with erosive esophagitis (p < 0.001), hiatus hernia (p = 0.03), greater DeMeester score (p = 0.001), and Zerbib scores for acid refluxes (p < 0.001) but not non-acid refluxes (p = 0.1). Mean total scores of QOLRAD-M and SF-36-M were correlated (r = 0.74, p < 0.001). GERDQ-M ≥8, erosive esophagitis, and DeMeester ≥14.72 were associated with impaired QOLRAD-M in all domains (all p < 0.02) but this was not seen with SF-36. Conclusions: GERDQ-M and QOLRAD-M are valid and reliable tools applicable in a primary care setting.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 494-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Naslund ◽  
Alicia Gilsenan ◽  
Kirk Midkiff ◽  
Eric Wolford ◽  
Aileen Bown ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Elaine Graves ◽  
Tanya N. Alim ◽  
Notalelomwan Aigbogun ◽  
Thomas A. Mellman ◽  
William B. Lawson

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1306-P
Author(s):  
DANIELLE S. MEDEIROS ◽  
LORENA S. ROSA ◽  
SOSTENES MISTRO ◽  
CLAVDIA N. KOCHERGIN ◽  
DANIELA A. SOARES ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document