Defining the Regulations of War in the Hague Convention of 1907

In this paper, the author explores the sources of European Union Law that regulate one segment of parental responsibility - the right of access to a child. The focal point of research is the transition from the conventional (interstate) regulation of judicial cooperation in marital disputes and parental responsibility issues to the regulation enacted by the European Union institutions, with specific reference to the Brussels II bis Regulation. First, the author briefly points out to its relationship with other relevant international law sources regulating this subject matter: the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction; the Hague Convention on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law, Recognition, Enforcement and Cooperation in the Field of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children; and other international sources of law. Then, the author examines in more detail its relationship with the Brussels II bis recast Regulation, which will be applicable as of 1 August 2022. In addition, the paper includes an analysis of the first case in which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) decided on the application of the Brussels II bis Regulation, at the request of granparents to exercise the right of access to the child. On the issue of determining the competent court which has jurisdiction to decide on how this right shall be exercised, the CJEU had to decide whether the competent court is determined on the basis of the Brussels II bis Regulation or on the basis of national Private International Law rules. This paper is useful for the professional and scientific community because it deals (inter alia) with the issue of justification of adopting a special source of law at the EU level, which would regulate the issue of mutual enforcement of court decisions on the right of access to the child. This legal solution was proposed by the Republic of France, primarily guided by the fundamental right of the child to have contact with both parents.

Download Full-text

A very long engagement: The Children's Act 38 of 2005 and the 1993 Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption

Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad ◽

10.17159/1727-3781/2009/v12i1a2720 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

pp. 53

Author(s):

Ed Couzens

Keyword(s):

South African ◽

Hague Convention ◽

Best Interests ◽

Dramatic Improvement ◽

Intercountry Adoption ◽

Current Regime ◽

The Hague ◽

The Hague Convention

This article analyses the intercountry adoptions provisions contained in Chapter 16 of the Children’s Act 38 of 2005, against the standards of the Hague Convention on the Protection of Children and Cooperation in Respect of Intercountry Adoptions, 1993. After a brief overview of the two leading South African cases on intercountry adoption, which stress the importance of having this institution statutorily regulated, the author proceeds to analyse the most significant clauses pertaining to intercountry adoptions contained in the Act, in order to identify the strengths and weaknesses in this new statutory framework. The author concludes that the Children’s Act is a dramatic improvement on the current regime of intercountry adoptions and that it has the potential to make this institution work in the best interests of children.

Download Full-text

The relevance and problems of the Hague Convention of July 2 2019 on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments ratification by the Russian Federation

Advances in Law Studies ◽

10.29039/2409-5087-2020-8-2-31-35 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 31-35

Author(s):

Marina Senicheva

Keyword(s):

Russian Federation ◽

Hague Convention ◽

Cross Border ◽

Recognition And Enforcement ◽

The Russian Federation ◽

The Hague ◽

The Hague Convention

The article sheds some light on problems that impede the ratification by the Russian Federation of the Hague Convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgements of July 2, 2019. As a result of analysis of the risks and prospects of ratification by the Russian Federation of the Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign judgements of July 2, 2019, the author concludes that there are no legal contradictions that could adversely affect ratification of the convention in question. In this regard it is possible to conclude that these are political contradictions and the Russian Federation’s reluctance to build a cross-border system for recognizing and enforcing decisions of foreign courts that can impede the convention's ratification

Download Full-text

Sustracción internacional de menores. Asunto vinculado con Suiza y España. Comentario de la sentencia de la Audiencia Provincial de Pontevedra (Sección 1ª) núm. 52/2018, de 17 de abril = International child abduction. Case related with Switzerland and Spain. Comment on the judgment of the Spanish Court of Appeal of Pontevedra (Section 1) number 52/2018 of 17th April

CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL ◽

10.20318/cdt.2019.4638 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 11 (1) ◽

pp. 671

Author(s):

Carmen Azcárraga Monzonís

Keyword(s):

Hague Convention ◽

Parental Responsibility ◽

Habitual Residence ◽

Child Abduction ◽

International Child ◽

The Hague ◽

A Minor ◽

The Hague Convention ◽

Court Of Appeal

Resumen: Sustracción internacional a España de menor residente en Suiza en aplicación del Convenio de La Haya de 1980 sobre los aspectos civiles de la sustracción internacional de menores. Discrepancia sobre la residencia habitual del menor. No se aprecian motivos de no retorno.Palabras clave: sustracción internacional de menores, Convenio de La Haya sobre sustracción, Convenio de La Haya sobre responsabilidad parental y protección de menores, residencia habitualAbstract: International abduction to Spain of a minor residing in Switzerland under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction of 1980. Discrepancy about the habitual residence of the minor. No grounds for return denial are appreciated.Keywords: international child abduction, Hague Convention on Child Abduction, Hague Convention on Parental Responsibility and Measures of the Protection of Children, habitual residence

Download Full-text

A convenção de haia sobre a cobrança internacional de alimentos em benefício dos filhos e de outros membros da família: a recente recepção pelo ordenamento jurídico brasileiro

Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFG ◽

10.5216/rfd.v42i2.51631 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 42 (2) ◽

pp. 76-96

Author(s):

Luciane Klein Vieira ◽

Taísa Nara de Oliveira Barbosa

Keyword(s):

International Cooperation ◽

Child Support ◽

Hague Convention ◽

Efficient Communication ◽

Recognition And Enforcement ◽

The Hague ◽

The Hague Convention ◽

Weak Party

O presente artigo tem como foco a cobrança internacional de alimentos, sua natureza e seus procedimentos, tendo em vista a recente ratificação da Convenção de Haia sobre a Cobrança Internacional de Alimentos em Benefício dos Filhos e de outros Membros da Família, pelo Brasil, em 2017. Neste sentido, busca estudar, em matéria de alimentos, o processo de reconhecimento e de execução de decisões estrangeiras a que estão submetidos os países signatários da referida Convenção, preocupando-se menos com um olhar individual e específico sobre como as sentenças transnacionais são reconhecidas e executadas no Brasil e mais com uma visão ampla sobre os principais aspectos da Convenção sobre as obrigações alimentares. O principal objetivo é demonstrar como a cooperação internacional, através das autoridades centrais, permite uma comunicação mais rápida e eficaz entre os Estados partes, beneficiando, deste modo, ao alimentando, objeto da tutela pretendida Abstract This article analyzes the international recovery of alimony, its nature and its procedures, in view of the Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance, ratified by Brazil in 2017. The article seeks to study, in the matter of alimony, the process of recognition and enforcement of foreign decisions to which the signatory countries of the Convention are subject. This seeks less an individual and specific look at how transnational sentences are recognized and enforced in Brazil and a broader view on the main aspects of the Convention on maintenance obligations. The main focus is on the objective of demonstrating how international cooperation between the states, through the central authorities, which allows for a faster and more efficient communication between the States Parties, thus benefiting the weak party, the object of the intended protection.

Download Full-text