Tubal patency evaluation by saline infusion sonography in cases with unilateral salpingectomy after ectopic pregnancy

Background: Infertility is a complex disorder with significant psychological and emotional impact. It affects 10-15% of couples in the reproductive age group. Hence, evaluation of female genital tract is an important part of workup of an infertile woman. The most commonly used methods are hysterosalpingography which exposes the patient to ionizing radiation and laparoscopy which is invasive. This calls for the need of a low risk method that would be suited for ambulatory application. Saline infusion sonohysterography is a cost-effective, safe, non-invasive and a rapid procedure to visualize the female pelvic organ in evaluation of infertility. The objective of this study was to compare diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography (SIS) over conventional hysterosalingography (HSG) for evaluation of female infertility.Methods: Total 50 patients who presented to the gynecology OPD between 2018 to September 2019 for evaluation of infertility were included for the study. The results of the two procedures were compared.Results: For evaluation of uterine cavity, SIS had a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV 75% and a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 91%, NPV of 100% for tubal patency as compared to HSG.Conclusions: For evaluation of uterine cavity, SIS had a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 100%, NPV 75% and a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 100%, PPV of 91%, NPV of 100% for tubal patency as compared to HSG.

Download Full-text

A comparative study to evaluate diagnostic accuracy and correlation between saline infusion sonography, hysterosalpingography and diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy in infertility

International Journal of Reproduction Contraception Obstetrics and Gynecology ◽

10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20200356 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (2) ◽

pp. 669

Author(s):

Arti Tiwari ◽

Beenu Kushwah Singh ◽

Anuradha Mishra

Keyword(s):

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

False Negative ◽

Screening Method ◽

Saline Infusion ◽

First Line ◽

Male Factor ◽

Gold Standard Method ◽

Saline Infusion Sonography ◽

Tubal Patency ◽

One Year

Background: Till date hysterosalpingography (HSG) remains the first-line method to detect tubal patency and to find out any uterine abnormalities in infertile female while diagnostic hysterolaparoscopy (DHL) is considered to be the gold standard method, it is during last decades only that saline infusion sonography (SIS)/ sonohysterography (SHG) has emerged as an efficacious method of checking tubal patency and uterine anatomy as well. The present study aims to compare all three methods viz- SIS, HSG and DHL and to evaluate the correlation between these methods.Methods: 98 infertile females of age group 18-35 years with normal Hormonal profile without any male factor infertility, were prospectively selected from the outpatient department of obstetrics and gynecology, GMH Rewa, Madhya Pradesh over one year from 1st August 2016 to 31st July 2017.Results: Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of SIS was found to be more than HSG for both tubal patency and uterine abnormalities detection. SIS has less numbers of false positive and false negative rates as compared to HSG. DHL was found to be much superior to both SIS and HSG, also detected additional findings in multiple sites like pelvis, tubes and the uterus on the same setting which were missed on SIS and HSG.Conclusions: SIS may replace HSG as a first step screening method for tubal patency detection, as it has more diagnostic accuracy than HSG and better correlation with DHL and has many advantages and minimal disadvantages as compared to HSG.

Download Full-text

Saline infusion sonography and office hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding

International Journal of Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology ◽

10.33545/gynae.2019.v3.i4c.306 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 3 (4) ◽

pp. 154-156

Author(s):

Dr. Nitin Kulkarni ◽

Dr. Urjita S Thavare

Keyword(s):

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding ◽

Uterine Bleeding ◽

Saline Infusion ◽

Office Hysteroscopy ◽

Saline Infusion Sonography

Download Full-text

Transvaginal Ultrasonography and Saline Infusion Sonography Compared to Hysteroscopy for Diagnosis of Intracavity Lesion: A 4-Year Experience in Suburban Referral Hospital

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand ◽

10.35755/jmedassocthai.2020.06.10240 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 103 (6) ◽

pp. 585-593

Keyword(s):

Predictive Value ◽

Final Diagnosis ◽

Saline Infusion ◽

Transvaginal Ultrasonography ◽

Histopathological Diagnosis ◽

Endometrial Polyps ◽

Saline Infusion Sonography ◽

Submucous Myoma ◽

Kappa Value ◽

Sensitivity Specificity

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS) and saline infusion sonography (SIS) in use for the diagnosis of endometrial polyps and submucous myoma compared to hysteroscopy. Histopathology was considered as the gold standard for final diagnosis. Materials and Methods: The present retrospective study was conducted at Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand between January 2014 and December 2017. Medical records of 150 patients who attended for hysteroscopy and histopathological diagnosis were reviewed. The accuracy of TVS and SIS for the diagnosis of endometrial polyps and submucous myoma were determined. Results: Out of 150 enrolled cases, endometrial polyp was the most frequent hysteroscopic finding in participants of the present study (92/150). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of TVS, SIS, and hysteroscopy compared to pathologic reports for detection endometrial polyps were 71.7% versus 93.5% versus 97.8%, 38.5% versus 52.2% versus 68.2%, 80.5% versus 88.7% versus 92.8%, 27.8% versus 66.7% versus 88.2%, and 64.4% versus 85.2% versus 92.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of TVS, SIS, and hysteroscopy for detection of submucous myoma were 81.6% versus 92.1% versus 94.7%, 66.7% versus 86.9% versus 100%, 77.5% versus 92.1% versus 100%, 72.0% versus 86.9% versus 90.9%, and 75.4% versus 90.2% versus 96.6%, respectively. The kappa value from TVS, SIS, and hysteroscopy when the histopathologic reports were overall intrauterine abnormalities, endometrial polyps and submucous myoma were 0.45/0.43/0.72, 0.77/0.76/0.89, and 0.92/0.92/1.00, respectively. Conclusion: Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, accuracy, and kappa value of SIS for detecting endometrial polyps and submucous myoma were better than TVS. Keywords: Ultrasonography, Saline infusion sonography, Hysteroscopy, Accuracy

Download Full-text

Evaluation of tubal patency using hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyCoSy) following salpingostomy and medical treatment of tubal pregnancy

Voprosy ginekologii akušerstva i perinatologii ◽

10.20953/1726-1678-2021-4-12-16 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 20 (4) ◽

pp. 12-16

Author(s):

Aml El-Shabrawy ◽

◽

Ahmed Elsheikh ◽

Samy Gebreel ◽

Mohammed Elsokkary ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Medical Treatment ◽

Ectopic Pregnancy ◽

Success Rate ◽

Fallopian Tube ◽

Tubal Pregnancy ◽

Tubal Patency ◽

Group I ◽

Case Series Study ◽

Maternity Hospitals ◽

Significant Difference

Objective. Ectopic pregnancy adversely affects the patency of the fallopian tube and consequently the future pregnancy. There are different options of conservative treatment of tubal pregnancy such as methotrexate and salpingostomy [1]. There is little information on the success rate of maintaining tubal patency after methotrexate and salpingostomy [2]. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the ipsilateral tubal patency using HyCoSy after treatment of tubal pregnancy with methotrexate therapy versus salpingostomy. Patients and methods. This was a case-series study conducted in Ain Shams and Al-Azhar University Maternity Hospitals to evaluate the ipsilateral tubal patency using hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography (HyC0Sy) following salpingostomy and medical treatment of tubal pregnancy. This study included patients who were admitted to Ain Shams and Al-Azhar University Maternity Hospitals for having tubal pregnancy and were treated either with methotrexate or salpingostomy over a 4-year period between January 2017 and December 2020. The patients seeking fertility were re-evaluated for fallopian tubes patency by hysterosalpingogram 3 months after discharge. The study included 2 groups of women: group I (n = 200): women who were treated with methotrexate, and group II (n = 140): women who underwent salpingostomy. Results. HSG was performed in 200 cases of patients with tubal pregnancy who were treated with methotrexate and 140 cases of patients who underwent salpingostomy. The patency of the ipsilateral tube was 85% after methotrexate treatment and 84.2% after salpingostomy. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion. The findings suggest similar success rate in maintaining the patency of the fallopian tube with either methotrexate or salpingostomy. Key words: ectopic pregnancy, hysterosalpingography, methotrexate, infertility, salpingostomy

Download Full-text