Body Modification: Tattooing and Body Piercing

2020 ◽  
pp. 131-132
2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (7) ◽  
pp. 931-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silke Wohlrab ◽  
Jutta Stahl ◽  
Thomas Rammsayer ◽  
Peter M. Kappeler

After a long history of negative stigmatisation, the practices of tattooing and body piercing have become fashionable in the last decade. Today, 10% of the population in modern western societies have some form of body modification. The aim of this study was to quantify the demographic and personality traits of tattooed and pierced individuals and to compare them with a control group of individuals without body modifications. These comparisons are based on questionnaires completed by 359 individuals that investigate the details of body modification, and which incorporate five personality scales. We describe several sex differences in ornament style and location. We found no relevant differences between modified and non‐modified individuals in relation to demographic variables. This indicates that some of the traditional attitudes towards tattoos and piercings appear to be outdated. However, we found striking differences in personality traits which suggest that body‐modified individuals are greater sensation seekers and follow a more unrestricted mating strategy than their non‐modified contemporaries. We discuss these differences in light of a potential signalling function of tattoos and piercings in the mating context. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


1999 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Edward Craun ◽  
J. T. Pennington ◽  
James C. Tate ◽  
Britton Lee Shelton

Open Medicine ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-152
Author(s):  
Adelaide Conti ◽  
Paola Bin ◽  
Claudia Casella ◽  
Emanuele Capasso ◽  
Piergiorgio Fedeli ◽  
...  

AbstractNon-therapeutic body modification interventions are permitted within the limits of the use of one’s own body that can be specified in the legal system. The authors take into consideration Italian regulation on tattooing and piercing, in particular in relation to adolescents.ResultsIn Italy, several regions have therefore issued acts aimed at regulating the activities of tattoo and piercing also in reference to minors. Discussion. With regard to minors, the rules taken into account set precise limits in relation to the age criterion and subordinate the implementation of such practices to the provision of consent by legal representatives.ConclusionIf such practices are of an aesthetic nature, we cannot avoid considering the implications they have on health protection, and then adopt appropriate measures to protect the person who intends to undergo them, particularly in the case of minors.


2002 ◽  
Vol 140 (2) ◽  
pp. 241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Carbone ◽  
Linda Myers
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document