Red Book Pediatric Infectious Diseases Clinical Decision Support Chart, 2nd ed

2021 ◽  

Fully revised and updated, the second edition of this full-color chart collects many of the most clinically useful tables, algorithms, and other items from the Red Book and presents them in an enlarged, enhanced, colorized format that is lightweight, portable, and easy to navigate. https://shop.aap.org/red-book-pediatric-infectious-diseases-clinical-decision-support-chart-2nd-edition/

2018 ◽  

This convenient flip chart provides pediatric health care professionals with point-of-care guidance on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of childhood infectious diseases. https://shop.aap.org/red-book-pediatric-infectious-diseases-clinical-decision-support-chart/


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Peiffer-Smadja ◽  
T.M. Rawson ◽  
R. Ahmad ◽  
A. Buchard ◽  
P. Georgiou ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1449-1451
Author(s):  
Sarimer M. Sánchez ◽  
Eileen F. Searle ◽  
David Rubins ◽  
Sayon Dutta ◽  
Winston Ware ◽  
...  

AbstractThe early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and ongoing efforts for mitigation underscore the importance of universal travel and symptom screening. We analyzed adherence to documentation of travel and symptom screening through a travel navigator tool with clinical decision support to identify patients at risk for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-220
Author(s):  
Kieran Walsh

This paper describes an evaluation of how doctors might use an online clinical decision support tool to improve the care that they would provide to patients with infectious disease and what features they would expect in such a clinical decision support tool. Semistructured interviews were conducted by telephone with doctors to evaluate the utility of a clinical decision support tool in helping them to improve the care that they would provide to patients with infectious disease and to assess the features that they would value in such a tool. The doctors were primarily interested in how they could use the tool to improve care. They were short of time and so needed to be able to access the content that they needed really quickly. They expected content that was both evidence based and current, and they used a range of devices to access the content. They used desktops, laptops, mobiles and sometimes mobile apps. Doctors view the utility of clinical decision support in the management of rare infectious diseases from a number of perspectives. However, they primarily see utility in the tools as a result of their capacity to improve clinical practice in infectious diseases.


2013 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
CHRISTOPHER NOTTE ◽  
NEIL SKOLNIK

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document