scholarly journals The utility of e-learning and clinical decision support resources in improving the practice of healthcare professionals in infectious diseases

MedEdPublish ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kieran Walsh
2020 ◽  
Vol 166 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-104
Author(s):  
Kieran Walsh ◽  
N Seyidov ◽  
M Wroczynski ◽  
G Payne ◽  
L Bhagavatheeswaran

Clinical decision support and e-learning will be essential if we are to achieve the goal of preventing outbreaks of infectious diseases caused by extremely dangerous pathogens. However, these resources on their own will not be enough to achieve this outcome. To achieve this outcome, resources must be integrated into undergraduate and postgraduate educational curricula, accredited as part of continuous professional development programmes, built around the knowledge and skills gaps of learners and developed using an evidence-based methodology that will enable healthcare professionals to put their learning into action for the benefit of both patients and populations. This article describes and contextualises the personal views discussed at a workshop on education and clinical decision support for healthcare professionals reacting to an infectious disease outbreak from extremely dangerous pathogens.


2018 ◽  

This convenient flip chart provides pediatric health care professionals with point-of-care guidance on the assessment, prevention, and treatment of childhood infectious diseases. https://shop.aap.org/red-book-pediatric-infectious-diseases-clinical-decision-support-chart/


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. e100121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kieran Walsh ◽  
Chris Wroe

IntroductionThis paper summarises a talk given at the first UK workshop on mobilising computable biomedical knowledge on 29 October 2019 in London. It examines challenges in mobilising computable biomedical knowledge for clinical decision support from the perspective of a medical knowledge provider.MethodsWe developed the themes outlined below after personally reflecting on the challenges that we have encountered in this field and after considering the barriers that knowledge providers face in ensuring that their content is accessed and used by healthcare professionals. We further developed the themes after discussing them with delegates at the workshop and listening to their feedback.DiscussionThere are many challenges in mobilising computable knowledge for clinical decision support from the perspective of a medical knowledge provider. These include the size of the task at hand, the challenge of creating machine interpretable content, the issue of standards, the need to do better in tracing how computable medical knowledge that is part of clinical decision support impacts patient outcomes, the challenge of comorbidities, the problem of adhering to safety standards and finally the challenge of integrating knowledge with problem solving and procedural skills, healthy attitudes and professional behaviours. Partnership is likely to be essential if we are to make progress in this field. The problems are too complex and interrelated to be solved by any one institution alone.


2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Peiffer-Smadja ◽  
T.M. Rawson ◽  
R. Ahmad ◽  
A. Buchard ◽  
P. Georgiou ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 1449-1451
Author(s):  
Sarimer M. Sánchez ◽  
Eileen F. Searle ◽  
David Rubins ◽  
Sayon Dutta ◽  
Winston Ware ◽  
...  

AbstractThe early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and ongoing efforts for mitigation underscore the importance of universal travel and symptom screening. We analyzed adherence to documentation of travel and symptom screening through a travel navigator tool with clinical decision support to identify patients at risk for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 218-220
Author(s):  
Kieran Walsh

This paper describes an evaluation of how doctors might use an online clinical decision support tool to improve the care that they would provide to patients with infectious disease and what features they would expect in such a clinical decision support tool. Semistructured interviews were conducted by telephone with doctors to evaluate the utility of a clinical decision support tool in helping them to improve the care that they would provide to patients with infectious disease and to assess the features that they would value in such a tool. The doctors were primarily interested in how they could use the tool to improve care. They were short of time and so needed to be able to access the content that they needed really quickly. They expected content that was both evidence based and current, and they used a range of devices to access the content. They used desktops, laptops, mobiles and sometimes mobile apps. Doctors view the utility of clinical decision support in the management of rare infectious diseases from a number of perspectives. However, they primarily see utility in the tools as a result of their capacity to improve clinical practice in infectious diseases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document