scholarly journals Endothelial Dysfunction Criteria in Critically Ill Children: The PODIUM Consensus Conference

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 149 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S97-S102
Author(s):  
Richard W. Pierce ◽  
John S. Giuliano ◽  
Jane E. Whitney ◽  
Yves Ouellette ◽  

OBJECTIVES To review, analyze, and synthesize the literature on endothelial dysfunction in critically ill children with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and to develop a consensus biomarker-based definition and diagnostic criteria. DATA SOURCES Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from January 1992 to January 2020, using a combination of medical subject heading terms and key words to define concepts of endothelial dysfunction, pediatric critical illness, and outcomes. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they evaluated critically ill children with endothelial dysfunction, evaluated performance characteristics of assessment/scoring tools to screen for endothelial dysfunction, and assessed outcomes related to mortality, functional status, organ-specific outcomes, or other patient-centered outcomes. Studies of adults or premature infants (≤36 weeks gestational age), animal studies, reviews or commentaries, case series with sample size ≤10, and non-English language studies with the inability to determine eligibility criteria were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted from each eligible study into a standard data extraction form along with risk of bias assessment. DATA SYNTHESIS We identified 62 studies involving 84 assessments of endothelial derived biomarkers indirectly linked to endothelial functions including leukocyte recruitment, inflammation, coagulation, and permeability. Nearly all biomarkers studied lacked specificity for vascular segment and organ systems. Quality assessment scores for the collected literature were low. CONCLUSIONS The Endothelial Subgroup concludes that there exists no single or combination of biomarkers to diagnose endothelial dysfunction in pediatric multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Future research should focus on biomarkers more directly linked to endothelial functions and with specificity for vascular segment and organ systems.

PEDIATRICS ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 149 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S23-S31
Author(s):  
Luregn J. Schlapbach ◽  
Scott L. Weiss ◽  
Melania M. Bembea ◽  
Joseph A. Carcillo ◽  
Francis Leclerc ◽  
...  

CONTEXT Multiple scores exist to characterize organ dysfunction in children. OBJECTIVE To review the literature on multiple organ dysfunction (MOD) scoring systems to estimate severity of illness and to characterize the performance characteristics of currently used scoring tools and clinical assessments for organ dysfunction in critically ill children. DATA SOURCES Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted from January 1992 to January 2020. STUDY SELECTION Studies were included if they evaluated critically ill children with MOD, evaluated the performance characteristics of scoring tools for MOD, and assessed outcomes related to mortality, functional status, organ-specific outcomes, or other patient-centered outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION Data were abstracted into a standard data extraction form by a task force member. RESULTS Of 1152 unique abstracts screened, 156 full text studies were assessed including a total of 54 eligible studies. The most commonly reported scores were the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction Score (PELOD), pediatric Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (pSOFA), Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), PRISM, and counts of organ dysfunction using the International Pediatric Sepsis Definition Consensus Conference. Cut-offs for specific organ dysfunction criteria, diagnostic elements included, and use of counts versus weighting varied substantially. LIMITATIONS While scores demonstrated an increase in mortality associated with the severity and number of organ dysfunctions, the performance ranged widely. CONCLUSIONS The multitude of scores on organ dysfunction to assess severity of illness indicates a need for unified and data-driven organ dysfunction criteria, derived and validated in large, heterogenous international databases of critically ill children.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 149 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S1-S12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melania M. Bembea ◽  
Michael Agus ◽  
Ayse Akcan-Arikan ◽  
Peta Alexander ◽  
Rajit Basu ◽  
...  

Prior criteria for organ dysfunction in critically ill children were based mainly on expert opinion. We convened the Pediatric Organ Dysfunction Information Update Mandate (PODIUM) expert panel to summarize data characterizing single and multiple organ dysfunction and to derive contemporary criteria for pediatric organ dysfunction. The panel was composed of 88 members representing 47 institutions and 7 countries. We conducted systematic reviews of the literature to derive evidence-based criteria for single organ dysfunction for neurologic, cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, acute liver, renal, hematologic, coagulation, endocrine, endothelial, and immune system dysfunction. We searched PubMed and Embase from January 1992 to January 2020. Study identification was accomplished using a combination of medical subject headings terms and keywords related to concepts of pediatric organ dysfunction. Electronic searches were performed by medical librarians. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the authors reported original data collected in critically ill children; evaluated performance characteristics of scoring tools or clinical assessments for organ dysfunction; and assessed a patient-centered, clinically meaningful outcome. Data were abstracted from each included study into an electronic data extraction form. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Consensus was achieved for a final set of 43 criteria for pediatric organ dysfunction through iterative voting and discussion. Although the PODIUM criteria for organ dysfunction were limited by available evidence and will require validation, they provide a contemporary foundation for researchers to identify and study single and multiple organ dysfunction in critically ill children.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (8) ◽  
pp. e209271
Author(s):  
L. Nelson Sanchez-Pinto ◽  
Emily K. Stroup ◽  
Tricia Pendergrast ◽  
Neethi Pinto ◽  
Yuan Luo

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (8) ◽  
pp. 506
Author(s):  
Diana Dobilienė ◽  
Jūratė Masalskienė ◽  
Šarūnas Rudaitis ◽  
Astra Vitkauskienė ◽  
Jurgita Pečiulytė ◽  
...  

Background and objectives: In hospitalized children, acute kidney injury (AKI) remains to be a frequent and serious condition, associated with increased patient mortality and morbidity. Identifying early biomarkers of AKI and patient groups at the risk of developing AKI is of crucial importance in current clinical practice. Specific human protein urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (uNGAL) and interleukin 18 (uIL-18) levels have been reported to peak specifically at the early stages of AKI before a rise in serum creatinine (sCr). Therefore, the aim of our study was to determine changes in uNGAL and uIL-18 levels among critically ill children and to identify the patient groups at the highest risk of developing AKI. Materials and methods: This single-center prospective observational study included 107 critically ill children aged from 1 month to 18 years, who were treated in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Hospital Kauno Klinikos from 1 December 2013, to 30 November 2016. The patients were divided into two groups: those who did not develop AKI (Group 1) and those who developed AKI (Group 2). Results: A total of 68 (63.6%) boys and 39 (36.4%) girls were enrolled in the study. The mean age of the patients was 101.30 ± 75.90 months. The mean length of stay in PICU and hospital was 7.91 ± 11.07 and 31.29 ± 39.09 days, respectively. A total of 32 (29.9%) children developed AKI. Of them, 29 (90.6%) cases of AKI were documented within the first three days from admission to hospital. In all cases, AKI was caused by diseases of non-renal origin. There was a significant association between the uNGAL level and AKI between Groups 1 and 2 both on day 1 (p = 0.04) and day 3 (p = 0.018). Differences in uNGAL normalized to creatinine in the urine (uCr) (uNGAL/uCr) between the groups on days 1 and 3 were also statistically significant (p = 0.007 and p = 0.015, respectively). uNGAL was found to be a good prognostic marker. No significant associations between uIL-18 or Uil-18/uCr and development of AKI were found. However, the uIL-18 level of >69.24 pg/mL during the first 24 h was associated with an eightfold greater risk of AKI progression (OR = 8.33, 95% CI = 1.39–49.87, p = 0.023). The AUC for uIL-18 was 73.4% with a sensitivity of 62.59% and a specificity of 83.3%. Age of <20 months, Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2) score of >2.5% on admission to the PICU, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome with dysfunction of three and more organ systems, PICU length of stay more than three days, and length of mechanical ventilation of >five days were associated with a greater risk of developing AKI. Conclusions: Significant risk factors for AKI were age of <20 months, PIM2 score of >2.5% on admission to the PICU, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome with dysfunction of 3 and more organ systems, PICU length of stay of more than three days, and length of mechanical ventilation of > five days. uNGAL was identified as a good prognostic marker of AKI. On admission to PICU, uNGAL should be measured within the first three days in patients at the risk of developing AKI. The uIL-18 level on the first day was found to be as a biomarker predicting the progression of AKI.


2010 ◽  
Vol 182 (11) ◽  
pp. 1181-1187 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Leteurtre ◽  
A. Duhamel ◽  
B. Grandbastien ◽  
F. Proulx ◽  
J. Cotting ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document