DOES PERTUSSIS VACCINE CAUSE PERMANENT BRAIN DAMAGE? UNITED KINGDOM COURT RULES

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. A54-A54
Author(s):  
Student

1. The preliminary issue to be determined by the court is, can pertussis vaccine cause permanent brain damage in young children? The question relates to pertussis vaccine manufactured in the United Kingdom and applies to all children whether or not they were neurologically normal before vaccination. The burden of proof rests on the Plaintiff and the standard of proof is that of the balance of probability. It must be shown that it is more likely than not that the vaccine can cause permanent brain damage. 2. The medical and expert opinion is deeply divided on the issue. 3. The question is not answered by showing that there is a respectable and responsible body of medical opinion that the vaccine can, albeit rarely, cause permanent brain damage, or that this view is/may be more widely held than the contrary. 4. Similarly the advice contained in the contra-indications against pertussis vaccination . . . cannot be relied upon as though it were evidence . . . that the vaccine in fact causes permanent brain damage. 5. Reports of . . . encephalopathy resulting in . . . brain damage or death where the onset occurs shortly after DTP vaccination, raises the hypothesis that the vaccine may cause brain damage or death. It does not prove the hypothesis. Such reports do not take account of events occurring by chance, for which no explanation can be found. What they do establish is that encephalopathy resulting occasionally in permanent brain damage or death does sometimes occur in close temporal proximity to pertussis vaccination. 6. I have reviewed the evidence and reasoning of the Plaintiffs and Defendants' expert witnesses . . . . I have found myself more impressed both by the cogency and quality of the evidence and reasoning of the experts called on behalf of the Defendants. 7. When I embarked on consideration of the preliminary issue, I was impressed by the case reports and what was evidently a widely held belief that the vaccination could, albeit rarely, cause permanent brain damage. I was ready to accept that this belief was well founded. But over the weeks that I have listened to and examined the evidence and arguments, I have become more and more doubtful that this is so. I have now come to the clear conclusion that the Plaintiff fails to satisfy me on the balance of probability that pertussis vaccine can cause permanent brain damage in young children. It is possible it does, the contrary cannot be proved. But in the result the Plaintiff's claim must fail.

1985 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 137-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Mendez

A clinical evaluation of a myoelectric hand prosthesis was carried out within a multicentre trial in three centres in the United Kingdom. The aim was to assess its effectiveness as an acceptable device for young children and to evaluate its technical efficiency. The trial ran for 2¾ years and included 87 children. The methodology used and the results obtained are presented with indications towards future developments.


1990 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 55-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
I Thornton ◽  
D J Davies ◽  
J M Watt ◽  
M J Quinn

1976 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Boss

The main purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the phenomenon of child abuse. It is intended to present some of the main facts and findings insofar as they have emerged in clinical and empirical work as well as some of the speculations which are enmeshed in such work. Additionally it is the intention to place the topic into a wider socio-cultural context which must inevitably involve some comment on political and economic factors. Perhaps it should be added that having embarked on such a global approach this paper cannot do more than act as an introduction to the topic of child abuse. This however may serve as a means by which interest is aroused in it and concern shared over a phenomenon which is an embarrassment to any civilised society. This concern has been rekindled over the past decade. The use of the word “rekindled” is deliberate since the literature of the United Kingdom and the U.S.A. has, to my knowledge, not really ceased to cover this topic since the great debates and activities surrounding the formation of societies for the protection of children in both countries toward the close of the last century. More recently however, clinicians, particularly in America, pointed the way to a revival of concern in the causation of non-accidental injuries to young children and equally important, have generated an interest in prevention and generally management of the problem.


2004 ◽  
Vol 8 (41) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Salmaso ◽  
Collective Editorial team

In August 2004, the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service announced the introduction of a new five-combination vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio and Hib in the infant vaccination schedule: 2, 3 and 4 months (DTaP/IPV/Hib)


1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Don Hindle

The latest edition of the Medical Journal of Australia presents an article by Stephen Bolsin, a British anaesthetist now working in Australia (Bolsin 1998). He describes how, as early as 1987, there was talk behind closed doors in the United Kingdom Department of Health about worrying results of paediatriccardiac surgery at a large public hospital in southern England, the Bristol Royal Infirmary. In 1988 Bolsin began work there. He had not heard the whispers, butsoon became concerned. He noted the long surgery times overall, and the long duration of the period during which the heart was off-line (and hence deprivedof oxygen). He suspected this could be associated with higher death rates and injuries (like brain damage).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document