BECLOMETHASONE GIVEN AFTER THE EARLY ASTHMATIC RESPONSE INHIBITS THE LATE RESPONSE AND THE INCREASED METHACHOLINE RESPONSIVENESS AND CROMOLYN DOES NOT

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-267
Author(s):  
David F. Graft

Purpose of the Study. To investigate whether beclomethasone or cromolyn provides any protection from the late asthmatic response if given after the allergen exposure. Methods. Ten patients with mild, stable, atopic asthma with late asthmatic responses entered a double blind, double dummy trial comparing a single dose of inhaled beclomethasone (500 µg), cromolyn (20 mg), and placebo administered 2 hours after allergen challenge on the severity of the late asthmatic response and the change in the log of PC20 methacholine. Findings. The late asthmatic response after beclomethasone of 7.3% ± 6.1% decrease in FEV1 was significantly less than that experienced after cromolyn (20.4% ± 15.2%) or placebo (26.4% ± 8.2%); cromolyn was not different than placebo. There was a trend for the change in log PC20 methacholine to be less following beclomethasone administration than that seen with placebo or cromolyn. Reviewer's Comments. It is well known that a single dose of cromolyn given before allergen exposure inhibits both the early and late phase response, whereas beclomethasone given prior to exposure will only prevent the late phase response. However, many individuals don't plan ahead well enough and need to know what medication should be taken if they have forgotten to take any pretreatment. This study indicates that, if bedomethasone, albeit in a dose equal to 12 puffs of the U.S. concentration, is taken even as late as 2 hours after the exposure, it can significantly inhibit the development of the late phase response. Cromolyn given at that time provides only minimal benefit.

2000 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishnan Parameswaran ◽  
Mark D Inman ◽  
Rick M Watson ◽  
Marilyn M Morris ◽  
Ann Efthimiadis ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND:A direct comparison of the protective effects of single and regular doses of inhaled glucocorticoid on allergen-induced asthmatic responses and inflammation has not been made.OBJECTIVE:To compare the effects of pretreatment with fluticasone 250 µg 30 min before allergen inhalation and two weeks of 250 µg twice daily (last dose 24 h before challenge) with single and regular (twice daily) placebo doses on early and late asthmatic responses, induced sputum cell counts and measures of eosinophil activation at 7 h and 24 h, and methacholine airway responsiveness at 24 h.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Ten mild asthmatic patients were studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled crossover study.RESULTS:Regular fluticasone increased the baseline mean provocative concentration of methacholine to cause a 20% fall (PC20) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from 2.6 to 6.4 mg/mL (P<0.05) and lowered the eosinophil count from 3.1% to 0.4% (P<0.05) compared with regular placebo. Neither single nor regular fluticasone had any effect on the early asthmatic response. Single fluticasone attenuated the late asthmatic response, the mean ± SEM maximum percentage fall in FEV1(10.8±3.6 compared with single placebo 18.8±3.5, P=0.03), the allergen-induced increase of airway responsiveness (P<0.05), and the eosinophilia (P<0.005) and activated eosinophils at 7 h (P<0.01) but not at 24 h. Regular fluticasone also attenuated the late asthmatic response (11.1±2.5) compared with regular placebo (19.6±4.5), but this was not statistically significant and did not protect against the induced increase in airway responsiveness or the sputum eosinophilia.CONCLUSION:Two weeks of regular inhaled fluticasone discontinued 24 h before allergen challenge does not offer any additional protection against the early or late asthmatic responses, increased airway responsiveness or sputum eosinophilia compared with a single dose of 250 µg immediately before allergen challenge, despite increasing baseline PC20and decreasing sputum eosinophilia prechallenge. The significance of the protective effect of a single dose of inhaled steroid before an allergen inhalation and the duration of the protective effect need further investigation.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. e0240964
Author(s):  
Hilary Siddall ◽  
Diana Quint ◽  
Hitesh Pandya ◽  
Will Powley ◽  
Shaila Shabbir ◽  
...  

Background Allergic asthma is a heterogenous disorder predominantly driven by a type 2 inflammatory response to aeroallergens. Therapeutic modulation to rebalance these type 2 responses may offer clinical benefit for allergic respiratory inflammatory diseases, with the potential for disease modification. GSK2245035, a selective toll-like receptor-7 agonist, preferentially stimulates the induction of type 1 interferon alpha, reducing type 2 responses. Objective This study investigated whether intranasal GSK2245035 reduced allergen-induced bronchial reactivity in mild allergic asthma. Methods This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group Phase IIa trial randomized (1:1) participants with mild allergic asthma to intranasal GSK2245035 20 ng or placebo once weekly for 8 weeks; follow-up was conducted 1, 4, and 12 weeks after treatment. Allergen-induced late asthmatic response 1 week after treatment was measured as minimum and weighted mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) 4–10 hours following bronchial allergen challenge (primary endpoint). Pharmacodynamic and allergic biomarkers, and adverse events, were assessed. A Bayesian analysis framework was used; a posterior probability >0.7 denoted primary endpoint success. Results Thirty-six participants were randomized (GSK2245035, n = 22; placebo, n = 14). The percentage attenuation in late asthmatic response was –4.6% (posterior probability: 0.385) and –10.5% (posterior probability: 0.303) for minimum and weighted mean FEV1, respectively. Type 2 responses were confirmed by changes in lung function, eosinophils (blood and sputum), interleukin-5 (sputum) and fractional exhaled nitric oxide biomarkers pre- and post-bronchial allergen challenge. However, no treatment effect was observed. Adverse events were reported by 10/14 (71%) and 21/22 (95%) participants in the placebo and GSK2245035 groups, respectively; headache was the most common. Conclusions and clinical relevance Although target engagement was observed, weekly intranasal GSK2245035 20 ng for 8 weeks did not substantially attenuate the late asthmatic response in participants with mild allergic asthma. Overall, treatment was well tolerated.


2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.L.M. Ricciardolo ◽  
A. Di Stefano ◽  
M. Silvestri ◽  
A.M. Van Schadewijk ◽  
M. Malerba ◽  
...  

Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) has been associated with bronchial eosinophilia and with airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in mild stable asthma. We previously demonstrated in a large project that allergen exposure is able to raise FeNO and to worsen AHR to bradykinin. We postulated that allergen-induced increase in FeNO could be related to heightened mucosal eosinophils and AHR to bradykinin in atopic asthma. We performed a new immunohistochemical analysis on bronchial biopsy specimens, previously obtained from the same large project, in order to assess the number of mucosal eosinophils (EG-2+ cell) and other inflammatory cells at 48 hours after diluent and allergen exposures. Inflammatory cell counts were related to FeNO and AHR to BK (expressed as logPD20 bradykinin). In 10 atopic mild asthmatics, we found that the numbers of EG-2+ and CD4+ cells in bronchial submucosa were significantly increased after allergen compared to the respective counts after diluent (p < 0.01). EG-2+ cells in the bronchial submucosa were negatively correlated with logPD20 bradykinin only after allergen challenge (rho = −0.709, p = 0.027). We also found a positive strong correlation between EG-2+ cells and FeNO values in atopic asthmatics at 48 hours after both diluent (rho = 0.746, p = 0.017) and allergen (rho = 0.644, p = 0.049) challenge. FeNO values negatively correlated with responsiveness to bradykinin only after allergen challenge (rho = −0.675, p = 0.039). This study indicates that after allergen exposure heightened level of exhaled NO may reflect augmented airway eosinophilic inflammation and airway responsiveness to bradykinin indicating loss of asthma control.


2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 26-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gail M Gauvreau ◽  
Mark D Inman ◽  
Margaret Kelly ◽  
Richard M Watson ◽  
Sandra C Dorman ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Treatment with inhaled glucocorticosteroids attenuates allergen-induced airway inflammation but is less effective in people with asthma who have noneosinophilic airway inflammation.OBJECTIVE: Studies in which glucocorticosteroid treatment was used before allergen challenges were re-examined to determine whether the efficacy of steroid treatment could be predicted by baseline levels of sputum inflammatory cells.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight nonsmoking subjects with atopic asthma controlled by beta2-agonists participated in only one of three studies, each carried out with a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized, crossover design. Subjects were treated with glucocorticosteroids or placebo for six to eight days and then underwent allergen inhalation challenge. Spirometry was measured for 7 h after allergen challenge, and then sputum inflammatory cells were measured. Sputum inflammatory cells were also measured before and after treatment, and 24 h after allergen challenge. The per cent inhibition of the allergen-induced airway responses by glucocorticosteroids was calculated.RESULTS: Inhaled gluticocorticosteroids significantly attenuated the early and late asthmatic responses, and the number of allergen-induced sputum eosinophils (P<0.05). There was a significant negative relationship between the number of sputum neutrophils at baseline, and the per cent inhibition of allergen-induced sputum eosinophils measured at 7 h (r=-0.61, P<0.001) and 24 h (r=-0.73, P<0.0001) after challenge, suggesting that glucocorticosteroids are less effective in attenuating allergen-induced airway inflammation in subjects with high levels of neutrophils. There was no correlation between the number of sputum eosinophils at baseline and the per cent inhibition of allergen-induced responses.CONCLUSIONS: Baseline airway neutrophils, not eosinophils, can be used to predict the efficacy of inhaled steroids on allergen-induced sputum eosinophils.


1994 ◽  
Vol 150 (5) ◽  
pp. 1262-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
E J Weersink ◽  
R Aalbers ◽  
G H Koëter ◽  
H F Kauffman ◽  
J G De Monchy ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 872-880 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Palmqvist ◽  
Z-H. Cui ◽  
M. Sjöstrand ◽  
A. Lindén ◽  
J. Lötvall

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document