scholarly journals Digital workflow of single visit full contour monolithic zirconia restoration with CEREC Omnicam intraoral scanner and fast zirconia sintering process

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-87
Author(s):  
Soo Young Lee
Author(s):  
Ece İrem Oğuz ◽  
Mehmet Ali Kılıçarslan

Zirconia has become a popular restorative material regarding the mechanical and biocompatibility advantages. Monolithic and translucent forms of zirconia advanced the aesthetics of this material, making it the material of choice for both tooth- and implant- supported restorations. Also, digital fabrication of zirconia not only enables accurate restorations but also provides time efficiency. The present case report demonstrates the rehabilitation of a patient who has generalized tooth wear with implant- and tooth supported monolithic zirconia restorations with buccal veneers in a newly established occlusal vertical dimension. The treatment process was completed in a digital workflow as the impressions were taken with a powder-free intraoral scanner and the digital data were send to the dental laboratory to fabricate the restorations. Monolithic zirconia restorations with buccal feldspathic veneers were completed without any adjustments in only two appointments. The patient was satisfied and the restorations have been in service for two years.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 5786
Author(s):  
Hwa-Jung Lee ◽  
Jeongho Jeon ◽  
Hong Seok Moon ◽  
Kyung Chul Oh

This technical procedure demonstrates a 4-step completely digital workflow for the fabrication of complete dentures in edentulous patients. The digital scan data of the edentulous arches were obtained using an intraoral scanner, followed by the fabrication of modeless trial denture bases using additive manufacturing. Using the trial denture base and a wax rim assembly, the interarch relationship was recorded. This record was digitized using an intraoral scanner and reversed for each maxillary and mandibular section individually. The digital scan data directly obtained using the intraoral scanner were superimposed over the reversed data, establishing a proper interarch relationship. The artificial teeth were arranged virtually and try-in dentures were additively manufactured. Subsequently, the gingival and tooth sections were additively manufactured individually and characterized. Thus, fabrication of digital complete dentures can be accomplished using digital data characteristics. The workflow includes data acquisition using an intraoral scanner, data processing using reverse engineering and computer-aided design software programs, and additive manufacturing.


2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panos Papaspyridakos ◽  
Kiho Kang ◽  
Catherine DeFuria ◽  
Sarah Amin ◽  
Yukio Kudara ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Mangano ◽  
Giovanni Veronesi

Aim. To compare the outcome of digital versus analog procedures for the restoration of single implants. Methods. Over a two-year period (2014-2016), all patients who had been treated in a dental center with a single implant were randomly assigned to receive either a monolithic zirconia crown, fabricated with digital workflow (test group), or a metal-ceramic crown, fabricated with analog workflow (control group). All patients were followed for 1 year after the delivery of the final crown. The outcomes were success, complications, peri-implant marginal bone loss (PIMBL), patient satisfaction, and time and cost of the treatment. Results. 50 patients (22 males, 28 females; mean age 52.6±13.4 years) were randomly assigned to one of the groups (25 per group). Both workflows showed high success (92%) and low complication rate (8%). No significant differences were found in the mean PIMBL between test (0.39±0.29mm) and control (0.54±0.32mm) groups. Patients preferred digital impressions. Taking the impression took half the time in the test group (20±5min) than in the control (50±7min) group. When calculating active working time, workflow in the test group was more time-efficient than in the control group, for provisional (70±15min versus 340±37min) and final crowns (29±9min versus 260±26min). The digital procedure presented lower costs than the analog (€277.3 versus €392.2). Conclusions. No significant clinical or radiographic differences were found between digital and analog procedures; however, the digital workflow was preferred by patients; it reduced active treatment time and costs. The present study is registered in the ISRCTN (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN36259164) with number 36259164.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Pontevedra ◽  
Carlos Lopez‐Suarez ◽  
Jesus Pelaez ◽  
Sara Garcia‐Serdio ◽  
Maria J Suarez

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 596-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed M. Ballo ◽  
Caroline T. Nguyen ◽  
Vincent S.K. Lee

2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 675-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueyin An ◽  
Zhehao Chui ◽  
Hyun-Woo Yang ◽  
Byung-Ho Choi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document