Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panos Papaspyridakos ◽  
Kiho Kang ◽  
Catherine DeFuria ◽  
Sarah Amin ◽  
Yukio Kudara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Digital Workflow ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Monolithic Zirconia

scholarly journals Inlay-Retained Fixed Dental Prosthesis: A Clinical Option Using Monolithic Zirconia

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Augusti ◽  
Gabriele Augusti ◽  
Andrea Borgonovo ◽  
Massimo Amato ◽  
Dino Re
Keyword(s):  
Functional Integration ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
High Strength ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Fixed Dental Prosthesis ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Monolithic Zirconia

Different indirect restorations to replace a single missing tooth in the posterior region are available in dentistry: traditional full-coverage fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), implant-supported crowns (ISC), and inlay-retained FDPs (IRFDP). Resin bonded FDPs represent a minimally invasive procedure; preexisting fillings can minimize tooth structure removal and give retention to the IRFDP, transforming it into an ultraconservative option. New high strength zirconia ceramics, with their stiffness and high mechanical properties, could be considered a right choice for an IRFDP rehabilitation. The case report presented describes an IRFDP treatment using a CAD/CAM monolithic zirconia IRFDP; clinical and laboratory steps are illustrated, according to the most recent scientific protocols. Adhesive procedures are focused on the Y-TZP and tooth substrate conditioning methods. Nice esthetic and functional integration of indirect restoration at two-year follow-up confirmed the success of this conservative approach.

scholarly journals Digital versus Analog Procedures for the Prosthetic Restoration of Single Implants: A Randomized Controlled Trial with 1 Year of Follow-Up

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Mangano ◽  
Giovanni Veronesi
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Digital Workflow ◽  
Digital Impressions ◽  
Monolithic Zirconia ◽  
Ceramic Crown ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Single Implant

Aim. To compare the outcome of digital versus analog procedures for the restoration of single implants. Methods. Over a two-year period (2014-2016), all patients who had been treated in a dental center with a single implant were randomly assigned to receive either a monolithic zirconia crown, fabricated with digital workflow (test group), or a metal-ceramic crown, fabricated with analog workflow (control group). All patients were followed for 1 year after the delivery of the final crown. The outcomes were success, complications, peri-implant marginal bone loss (PIMBL), patient satisfaction, and time and cost of the treatment. Results. 50 patients (22 males, 28 females; mean age 52.6±13.4 years) were randomly assigned to one of the groups (25 per group). Both workflows showed high success (92%) and low complication rate (8%). No significant differences were found in the mean PIMBL between test (0.39±0.29mm) and control (0.54±0.32mm) groups. Patients preferred digital impressions. Taking the impression took half the time in the test group (20±5min) than in the control (50±7min) group. When calculating active working time, workflow in the test group was more time-efficient than in the control group, for provisional (70±15min versus 340±37min) and final crowns (29±9min versus 260±26min). The digital procedure presented lower costs than the analog (€277.3 versus €392.2). Conclusions. No significant clinical or radiographic differences were found between digital and analog procedures; however, the digital workflow was preferred by patients; it reduced active treatment time and costs. The present study is registered in the ISRCTN (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN36259164) with number 36259164.

Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Partial Dentures Using a Complete Digital Workflow: Two‐Year Follow‐Up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Pontevedra ◽  
Carlos Lopez‐Suarez ◽  
Jesus Pelaez ◽  
Sara Garcia‐Serdio ◽  
Maria J Suarez
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Digital Workflow ◽  
Monolithic Zirconia

Complete-arch Implant-supported Composite Pressed Restorations Fixed Dental Prostheses

2018 ◽  
Vol 68 (12) ◽  
pp. 3006-3009
Author(s):  
Sorin Gheorghe Mihali ◽  
Emanuel Adrian Bratu ◽  
Laura Cristina Rusu
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Option ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Metal Framework ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Fixed Prosthesis ◽  
Function Range ◽  
Composite Restoration

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the composite pressed on metal framework for full-arch implant-supported fixed prosthesis in order to eliminate the drawbacks related to the chipping of porcelain fused to metal or to zirconia restorations. Sixteen patients received 22 implant-supported screw-cement-retained complete-arch restorations, consisting of composite pressed restorations. All patients were follow-up visit up to 2 years on function (range 24 to 30 months, mean 28.3 months). The outcomes were implant and prosthetic survival rates and calculations of wear determination (mm). After two years of function, the wear values were 95.54�6.88 mm on pressed composite restoration. Using composite pressed restorations appears to be a predictable, esthetic and successful treatment option for method of full arch restorations over implants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document