Mechanical Stratigraphy Modeling, the Foundation of Unconventional Geomechanical Analysis

Author(s):  
Roda Bradley ◽  
Vahid Mostafavi
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. P. Laya

Understanding of field mechanical stratigraphy in terms of formation behavior due to coupled interaction between formation pressure depletion and state of stresses is crucial to achieving successful field development. These provide technical advantages of having a solid foundation for implementation in advanced well construction and completion strategy, especially in light of emerging and challenging plays related to unconventional reservoirs. This paper describes full-field interaction between formation behavior in 4D Geomechanical analysis of Kerendan Field located in Upper Kutai Basin, Central Kalimantan area on gas-condensate production from massive carbonate tight gas reservoir. Integrated 1D/3D/4D geomechanics study workflow result has enabled characterization of each mechanical stratigraphy unit, as follows: The overburden section is comprised of Miocene deltaic clastic succession which is characterized as “soft formation” with low stiffness (Static Young’s Modulus of 0.5 to 1.8 Mpsi) and low - medium rock strength (UCS of 800 to 2000 psi); Reservoir section comprised of Oligocene tight carbonates platform which characterized as “hard formation” with medium stiffness (Static Young’s Modulus of 3.0 to 4.5 Mpsi) and medium rock strength (UCS of 5000 to 6900 psi); Underburden section comprised of Eocene mixed-carbonate clastic succession and Pre-Tertiary metasediments which characterized as “very hard formation” with high stiffness (Static Young’s Modulus of 4.5 to 5.0 Mpsi) and medium rock strength (UCS of 6500 to 7900 psi). The Kerendan field would require implementation of special drilling and stimulation techniques in order to achieve optimum full field development potential owing to its reservoir characteristics. The field’s exhibit a large areal extent and massive tight limestone reservoir with relatively high Young’s Modulus, which is favorable for the utilization of extended reach drill (ERD) / horizontal wells followed with multi-stage acid fracturing stimulation. 3D/4D Geomechanical analysis is essential to assess the drillability and engineering limits of various development scenarios which will be strongly controlled by geomechanical fabric, pre-existing deformation/local discontinuities, prevailing principal stress tensor and stress changes during field production.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P. Evans ◽  
◽  
James A. Kessler ◽  
Xiewei Chen ◽  
Kelly K. Bradbury ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. P. Wennberg ◽  
T. Svånå ◽  
M. Azizzadeh ◽  
A. M. M. Aqrawi ◽  
P. Brockbank ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-204
Author(s):  
Bruce Hart ◽  
Scott Cooper

We characterize relationships between stratigraphy and natural fractures in outcrops of Mesozoic strata that rim the San Juan Basin in New Mexico and Colorado. These outcrops expose fluvial and shallow-marine siliciclastic deposits and calcareous mudstones deposited in a distal marine setting. We focus primarily on a regionally extensive fracture set formed during the Eocene to minimize localized tectonic effects on fracture development. Where possible, we supplement our observations with wireline log- or laboratory-derived measurements of rock properties. Our goals are twofold: 1) to illustrate how direct integration of data and concepts from stratigraphy and structural geology can lead to better fracture characterization, and 2) to develop thought processes that will stimulate new exploration and development strategies. Genetic beds form one scale of stratification in the outcrops we describe. For example, sandstone beds can be arranged into coarsening and thickening upward successions that are the depositional record of shoreline progradation. In fluvial settings, cm- to dm-scale sandstone beds can also be part of m-scale single-storey channel complexes that, themselves, can be arranged into amalgamated channel complexes 10s of m thick. In these and other settings, it is important to distinguish between beds and features that can be defined via wireline logs because it is the former (cm- to dm-scale) that are usually the primary control the distribution of natural fractures. The extension fractures we describe are typically bed-bound, with bedding being defined by lithology contrasts and the associated changes in elastic properties. Fracture spacing distributions are typically lognormal with average spacing being less than bed thickness. Although mechanical bedding and depositional bedding are commonly the same, diagenesis can cut across bed boundaries and complicate this relationship, especially where lithologic contrasts are small. Deposits from similar depositional environments which undergo different diagenetic histories can have substantially different mechanical properties and therefore deform differently in response to similar imposed stresses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document