scholarly journals Acute coronary syndrome risk prediction of rapid emergency medicine scoring system in acute chest pain. An observational study of patients presenting with chest pain in the emergency department in Central Saudi Arabia

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 900-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahir Mehmood ◽  
Mohammad Al Shehrani ◽  
Muhammad Ahmad
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Acute Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

scholarly journals Current Role of Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 266
Author(s):  
Min Ji Son ◽  
Seung Min Yoo ◽  
Dongjun Lee ◽  
Hwa Yeon Lee ◽  
In Sup Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Acute Chest Pain ◽  
Review Article ◽  
Current Role ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Ct Findings

This review article provides an overview regarding the role of computed tomography (CT) in the evaluation of acute chest pain (ACP) in the emergency department (ED), focusing on characteristic CT findings.

scholarly journals Acute chest pain fast track at the emergency department: who was misdiagnosed for acute coronary syndrome?

2016 ◽  
Vol Volume 8 ◽  
pp. 111-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thidathit Prachanukool ◽  
Kasamon Aramvanitch ◽  
Kittisak Sawanyawisuth ◽  
Yuwares Sitthichanbuncha
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Acute Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

Abstract 681: Characteristics of Atherosclerotic Plaque Burden in Patients With and Without Acute Coronary Syndrome Presenting With Acute Chest Pain to the Emergency Department

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Bamberg ◽  
Maros Ferecik ◽  
Quynh Truong ◽  
Ian Rogers ◽  
Michael Shapiro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Arteries ◽  
Atherosclerotic Plaque ◽  
Acute Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Plaque ◽  
Plaque Burden ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Coronary Ct ◽  
Calcified Plaque

Background: Coronary computed tomography (CT) may improve the early triage of patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department (ED). The aim of this study was to compare the presence and extent of coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by coronary CT in patients with and without acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods: The study was designed as a prospective, observational cohort study in patients with acute chest pain but negative cardiac biomarkers and no diagnostic ECG changes, admitted to rule out myocardial ischemia. All patients underwent coronary CT prior to hospital admission. The presence of coronary plaque was treated as a dichotomous outcome, and the extent of CAD was defined as number of (1) coronary segments with plaque, or (2) major coronary arteries with plaque detected by MDCT as assessed by two independent observers. The clinical outcome (ACS) was adjudicated by a review committee using established AHA criteria; subjects with history of CAD (stent placement, bypass) were excluded. Results : Among 368 patients with acute chest pain (mean age 53±12 years, 61% male) 31 patients were determined to have ACS (8%). None of the 183 subjects without plaque (50%) had an ACS. Among the remaining 185 subjects (mean age 58.0±11.5 years, 68% male) in whom coronary plaque was detected, patients with ACS had a significantly more plaque (7.2±3.7 vs. 4.2±3.4, p<0.0001 segments) as compared to subjects without ACS. Similar results were seen for calcified plaque and non-calcified plaque (6.5±3.7 vs. 3.6±3.5 segments, p<0.0001; and 3.6±3.2 vs. 1.8±2.2 segments, p<0.0001, respectively). In addition, the rate of ACS increased with the number of major coronary arteries with plaque (1-vessel: 6.8%, 2-vessels: 10.6%, 3 vessels: 30.8%, and 4-vessels: 25%; p<0.01). In contrast, the ratio of non-calcified to calcified plaque was not different between patients with and without ACS (0.68±0.6 vs. 0.54±0.72, p=0.31). Conclusions: The extent of coronary plaque differs between subjects with and without ACS among patients presenting with acute chest pain. Detailed assessment of the extent and composition of coronary plaque may be helpful to assess risk of ACS among patients with acute chest pain but inconclusive initial ED evaluation.

Abstract 12162: Association of Symptom Clusters With Mode of Transportation to Emergency Department in Patients Diagnosed With Acute Coronary Syndrome

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie L Davis ◽  
Thomas P McCoy ◽  
Barbara Riegel ◽  
Sharon McKinley ◽  
Lynn Doering ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Delay Time ◽  
Symptom Clusters ◽  
Prehospital Delay ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Stress Symptoms ◽  
Mode Of Transportation

Background: Prompt treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity; yet many patients delay seeking care. In order to receive timely care, symptoms of ACS need to be recognized, interpreted, and acted upon. Patients who experience symptoms matching their expectations and those with correct symptom attribution are more likely to use emergency medical services (EMS) as a means of transportation to the hospital. The connection between symptom type and EMS use has not been fully explored. Purpose: To assess if clusters of presenting symptoms are associated with EMS transportation to the emergency department (ED) in patients with ACS and to evaluate if EMS transportation or symptom clusters are associated with prehospital delay time. Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted from the PROMOTION trial, a randomized controlled trial to reduce patient prehospital delay in ACS. Results: Of the 3,522 subjects with coronary artery disease enrolled, 3,087 completed 2-year follow-up. Of these, 331 subjects visited an ED for ACS symptoms during follow-up. Among the 331, 84% (278) had mode of transportation documented; 44% arrived by EMS. Having classic ACS symptoms (chest pain, pressure, or discomfort) in combination with pain symptoms (AOR=2.66, p = 0.011), classic ACS symptoms in combination with stress symptoms (AOR=2.61, p = 0.007) or classic ACS symptoms in combination with both pain and stress symptoms (AOR=3.90, p = 0.012) were associated with higher odds of arriving to the ED by EMS compared to classic ACS symptoms alone. Among 260 patients with prehospital delay time available, arriving by EMS decreased median delay time by 68.5 minutes compared to those with other transportation, after accounting for symptom clusters, patient and study characteristics (p = 0.002). Symptom clusters did not predict delay time in adjusted modeling (p = 0.952). Conclusion: While chest pain was the most prevalent symptom of ACS for most (85%), these findings suggest that it is the cluster of classic ACS symptoms with other types of symptom that motivate patients to use EMS. With less than half of patients using EMS, further research is needed to better understand how symptom clusters influence care-seeking behavior.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document