scholarly journals MEMAHAMI SEJARAH MELALUI AYAT-AYAT AL-QUR’AN

Author(s):  
Johan Septian Putra

Abstract Understanding the al-Qur’an through its verses is something that must be done for followers of Islam, of course, but in the context of academics, all circles have the right to know the content of the verses of the Koran, including in this case the historical context in Al-Qur'an. The purpose of this paper is to elaborate on the understanding of history based on the verses of the al-Qur'an, as part of the basic thinking for Islamic historians. The research method used is historical research, which includes heuristics, verification, interpretation and writing. The results of the research in this paper can be concluded that the verses of the al-Qur'an contain through the stories told in them contain laws of change made by humans themselves, starting from the beginning of appearance, progress, peak of progress, decline to collapse.   Key Words: Verses of al-Qur’an, Islamic History, and Stories       Abstrak Memahami al-Qur’an melalui ayat-ayatnya adalah hal yang harus dilakukan bagi penganut agama Islam tentunya, tetapi dalam konteks akademisi semua kalangan berhak untuk mengetahui kandugan dari ayat-ayat al-Qur’an tersebut, termasuk dalam hal ini perihal konteks kesejarahan dalam al-Qur’an. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengelaborasi pemahaman sejarah berdasarkan ayat-ayat al-Qur’an, sebagai bagian landasan berpikir bagi sejarawan Islam. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian sejarah, yang mana mencakup heuristik, verifikasi, interpretasi dan penulisan. Hasil penelitian dalam tulisan ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa ayat-ayat al-Qur’an mengandung melalui kisah-kisah yang diceritakan di dalamnya mengandung hukum perubahan yang dibuat oleh manusia itu sendiri, mulai dari awal kemunculan, kemajuan, puncak kemajuan, kemunduran hingga keruntuhan. Kata Kunci: Ayat-ayat Al-Qur’an, Sejarah Islam, dan Kisah-kisah

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (Edsus) ◽  
Author(s):  
Trusto Subekti

Partial understanding about children and their rights according to Law No. 1 of 1974 and Law no. 23 of 2002, become confusing. If the concept of "every child" has the right to know his parents, raised and nurtured by the parents themselves are connected with the concept of illegitimate children, there will arise the question of whether an illegitimate child ("child adultery"), may file a lawsuit to the Court, in case the biological father has been married to another woman. The result of systematic interpretation in the application of Article 7 paragraph (1) Act No. 23 of 2002 based on the principles and specific legal principles in family law and marriage, the recognition of children can not be applied to "every child" and it only works for children out of wedlock with her biological father is not bound by the terms of marriage with another woman.  The expected contribution is the implementation of human rights in every national legal product should consider the principle of legal certainty, usefulness and fairness, and not just create new problems in society. Key words: systematic interpretation, every child, child recognition


2000 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 353-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel S. Epstein

An interlocking legislative complex is proposed for the control of carcinogenic and other adverse impacts of established run-away petrochemical and radionuclear technologies, with particular reference to winning the losing war against cancer. These proposals are also applicable to the poorly recognized, potentially adverse public health and environmental hazards of emerging technologies, particularly genetically engineered food production. The proposals embody fundamental democratic rights—the right to know and balanced and transparent decision making—the “Precautionary Principle,” reduction in the use of toxics, incentives for the development of safe industrial technologies, and criminal sanctions for suppression or manipulation of information.


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Simas ◽  
D Braga ◽  
A Setti ◽  
R Melamed ◽  
A Iaconell ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question Do couples undergoing assisted reproduction treatments (ART) have a different perception of anonymous vs identity-release gamete donation than a population interested in the subject? Summary answer Compared with a population interested in the subject, more couples undergoing ART believed the child shouldn’t be given information that would identify the gamete-donor. What is known already Recent research has investigated the psychological well-being of parents and children born through gamete donation, focusing on the possibility of having the donor’s identity revealed. Gamete donors have traditionally been anonymous to recipients and offspring; however, there is a global trend towards programs using donors that are identifiable to the resulting offspring at maturity. While some countries only allow the use of identity-release egg donation, others only allow anonymous-donation, and in some countries both types of donation are practiced. However, the attitudes concerning anonymous vs identity-release gamete donation, in a country where only anonymous donation is allowed, are still unknown. Study design, size, duration This cross-sectional study was performed from 01/Sep/2020 to 15/Dec/2020. For that, surveys through online-platforms were conducted, including either patients undergoing ART, (ART-group, n = 358) or those interested in the subject, who accessed the website of a university-affiliated IVF-center (interested-group, n = 122). Participants in the ART-group were invited via e-mail, with a cover-letter outlining the survey and a link to access it and participants in the interested-group accessed the questionnaire via website. Participants/materials, setting, methods The survey collected information on demographic characteristics and the participant’s attitudes towards anonymity of gamete donors. The questions were: (i) In the case of children conceived through ART, do you believe that revealing the method of conception may affect the relationship between children and their parents? (ii) Once the method of conception is revealed, do you believe that the child has the right to know the gamete donor? (iii) If yes, when? Main results and the role of chance Most of the participants answered that the relationship between children and parents wouldn’t be affected by the child’s knowledge of the origin of their conception, regardless of the group (83.6% vs 82.7%, for ART-group and interested-group, respectively, p = 0.868). Most participants in the ART-group answered that the sperm donor identity shouldn’t be revealed to the child, while only half of the interested-group stated the same (65.4% vs 50.8%, p = 0.044). The same result was observed when participants were asked if the oocyte donor should be identifiable (64.8% vs 50.8%, p = 0.050). When asked when the donor’s identity should be revealed to the child, no significant differences were noted in the responses among the groups (p = 0.868). Most of the participants who believe that the child has the right of learning the donor’s identity, stated that “the donor’s identity should be revealed if the child questions its biological origin” (67.2% vs 67.5%, for ART-group and interested-group, respectively). “Since birth” was the second most common response, (21.0% vs 19.7%, for ART-group and interested-group, respectively), while “when the child turns 18 years-old” (9.2% vs 11.2%, for ART-group and interested-group, respectively), and “sometime during teenage years” (2.5% vs 2.4%, for ART-group and interested-group, respectively) were less common answers. Limitations, reasons for caution Lack of adequate opportunities to conduct face to face interview and lack of knowledge of the real state of the website participants, concerning infertility or being involved in ART. The retrospective nature of the study and the small sample size may also be reasons for caution, Wider implications of the findings: It has been discussed that, whether or not children or parents are harmed by knowing their biological origins, donor offspring have the right to know. However, when facing the situation, couples undergoing ART would argue that in case of gamete donation, there are reasons for not telling the child. Trial registration number Not applicable


1926 ◽  
Vol 104 (23) ◽  
pp. 595-596
Author(s):  
A. W. Burr

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document