On the Glass Formation in Systems Forming Icosahedral Quasicrystals

1986 ◽  
Vol 80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonid A. Bendersky ◽  
Stephen D. Ridder

AbstractRapidly solidified micron and submicron size droplets of Al-14 a/o Mn have been used to study the possibility of glass formation and nucleation behavior of icosahedral phase. Homogeneous nucleation of icosahedral phase is assumed, based on the high grain density (>1015 mm−3). Extremely low nucleation resistance of icosahedral phase can be understood when possible topological similarities between liquid and icosahedral quasicrystal structures are considered. Configurationally frozen liquid in Al-Mn and similar alloy systems is questionable, implying that Al-Mn “glass” probably has a microquasicrystalline structure.

1986 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 405-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
L.A. Bendersky ◽  
S.D. Ridder

Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) atomization has been used to rapidly solidify micron and submicron size droplets of Al-14 at. % Mn to study nucleation behavior of icosahedral phase. Icosahedral grain size has been found to decrease continuously with decreasing droplet size. Based on this result, formation of the icosahedral phase is explained by homogeneous nucleation. Extremely low resistance to nucleation of icosahedral phase can be understood if possible topological similarities between liquid and icosahedral quasicrystal are considered. Formation of glass as configurationally frozen liquid in Al-Mn and similar alloy systems is questionable, implying that the reported Al-Mn glass probably has a microquasicrystalline structure.


2001 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. 2103-2117 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Srivastava ◽  
S. Ranganathan

The present study of rapidly solidified melt-spun Al80Fe14Si6 Al80V14Si6, and Al80Fe10V4Si6 alloys by electron microscopy techniques, x-ray diffractometry, and differential scanning calorimetry leads to a number of microstructural results. Coexistence of a micro-quasicrystalline state of an icosahedral phase with monoclinic θ–Al13Fe4 and hexagonal β–Al6V in Al–Fe–Si and Al–V–Si alloys, respectively, is reported. Also, the growth morphology of the icosahedral phase surrounded by a crystalline ring was investigated in an Al–Fe–V–Si alloy. The crystalline ring has the particles of the cubic α–Al12(Fe,V)3Si silicide phase. Evidence of irrational twinning of cubic crystals, giving rise to a symmetry not deviating much from icosahedral symmetry was found in this alloy. In all the three alloys crystalline intermetallics were elucidated in the context of rational approximants of an icosahedral quasicrystal. It was noticed that while the icosahedral phase in Al–Fe–Si and Al–V–Si alloys transforms to crystalline intermetallics at about the same temperature (approximately 610 K), the transformation of icosahedral phase in Al–Fe–V–Si alloy occurred at a relatively lower temperature (540 K). The origin of different metastable microstructures and their stability at elevated temperatures, in these alloys, are compared and discussed.


Author(s):  
Wang Rong ◽  
Ma Lina ◽  
K.H. Kuo

Up to now, decagonal quasicrystals have been found in the alloys of whole Al-Pt group metals [1,2]. The present paper is concerned with the TEM study of a hitherto unreported hexagonal phase in rapidly solidified Al-Ir, Al-Pd and Al-Pt alloys.The ribbons of Al5Ir, Al5Pd and Al5Pt were obtained by spun-quenching. Specimens cut from the ribbons were ion thinned and examined in a JEM 100CX electron microscope. In both rapidly solidified Al5Ir and Al5Pd alloys, the decagonal quasicrystal, with rosette or dendritic morphologies can be easily identified by its electron diffraction patterns(EDPs). The EDPs of the decagonal phase for the two alloys are quite similar. However, the existance of decagonal quasicrystal in the Al-Pt alloy has not been verified by our TEM study. It is probably for the reason that the cooling rate is not great enough for the Al5Pt alloy to form the decagonal phase. During the TEM study, a metastable hexagonal phase has been observed in the Al5Ir, Al5Pd and Al5Pt alloys. The lattic parameters calculated from the X-ray powder data of this phase are a=1.229 and c=2.647nm(Al-Pd) and a=1.231 and c=2.623nm(Al-Ir). The composition of this phase was determined by EDS analysis as Al4(Ir, Pd or Pt). It coexists with the decagonal phase in the alloys and transformed to other stable crystalline phases on heating to high temperature. A comparison between the EDPs of the hexagonal and the decagonal phase are shown in Fig.l. Fig. 1(a) is the EDPs of the decagonal phase in various orientions and the EDPs of the hexagonal phase are shown in Fig.1(b), in a similar arrangement as Fig.1(a). It can be clearly seen that the EDPs of the hexagonal phase, especially the distribution of strong spots, are quite similar to their partners of the decagonal quasicrystal in Fig.1(a). All the angles, shown in Fig.l, between two corresponding EDPs are very close to each other. All of these seem strongly to point out that a close structural relationshipexists between these two phases:[110]//d10 [001]//d2(D) //d2 (P)The structure of α-AlFeSi is well known [3] and the 54-atom Mackay icosahedron with double icosahedral shells in the α-AlFeSi structure [4] have been used to model the icosahedral quasicrystal structure. Fig.2(a) and (b) show, respectively, the [110] and [001] projections of the crystal structure of α- AlFeSi, and decagon-pentagons can easily be identified in the former and hexagons in the latter. In addition, the optical transforms of these projections show clearly decagons and hexagons of strong spots, quite similar to those in [110] and [001] EDPs in Fig.1(b). This not only proves the Al(Ir, Pt, Pd) metastable phase being icostructural with the α-AlFeSi phase but also explains the orientation relationship mentioned above.


1985 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Schaefer ◽  
Leonid A Bendersky

ABSTRACTElectron beam surface melting has been used to study Al-Mn and Al-Mn-Si alloys subjected to a wide range of solidification conditions. Several of the reported equilibrium intermetallic phases are not found even at moderate growth rates. Beyond a composition-dependent critical velocity the equilibrium phases are all replaced by the quasicrystalline icosahedral and decagonal (T) phases. The icosahedral phase is favored over the T phase by higher solidification velocities. The addition of Si to Al-Mn alloys eliminates the T phase, but does not significantly facilitate the formation of the icosahedral phase by electron beam melting because the ternary α and β phases of Al-Mn-Si are able to grow rapidly into the electron beam melts.


2007 ◽  
pp. 1275-1278
Author(s):  
Qing Wang ◽  
Chun Lei Zhu ◽  
Yan Hui Li ◽  
Jiang Wu ◽  
Chuang Dong ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 144 ◽  
pp. 012048 ◽  
Author(s):  
C L Zhu ◽  
Q Wang ◽  
F W Li ◽  
Y H Li ◽  
Y M Wang ◽  
...  

1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1155-1158 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Dong ◽  
Z.K. Hei ◽  
L.B. Wang ◽  
Q.H. Song ◽  
Y.K. Wu ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 1119-1122 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.K. Mukhopadhyay ◽  
H.J. Chang ◽  
J.Y. Lee ◽  
D.H. Kim

1992 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 2756-2764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Li ◽  
E. Johnson ◽  
A. Johansen ◽  
L. Sarholt-Kristensen

Thermodynamic properties of the melts of several Al–Y and Al–Fe–Y alloys are studied by means of calibrated differential thermal analysis. The results can be used to optimize process parameters of rapid solidification which are important for glass formation in the Al-based alloys. Close examinations of the melt-spun alloys show that the process parameters, particularly the temperature of the melts, will influence not only the amorphicity and the chemical short-range order but also the crystallization process of the glasses. A key point of glass formation in the Al-based alloys is found to be related to the content in the melts of a certain amount of the intermetallic compounds which are gradually dissolved in the premelted α Al matrix.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document