A Metastable Crystalline Phase Coexisted with the Decagonal Quasicrystals in Rapidly Solidified Al-Ir Al-Pd and Al-Pt Alloys

Author(s):  
Wang Rong ◽  
Ma Lina ◽  
K.H. Kuo

Up to now, decagonal quasicrystals have been found in the alloys of whole Al-Pt group metals [1,2]. The present paper is concerned with the TEM study of a hitherto unreported hexagonal phase in rapidly solidified Al-Ir, Al-Pd and Al-Pt alloys.The ribbons of Al5Ir, Al5Pd and Al5Pt were obtained by spun-quenching. Specimens cut from the ribbons were ion thinned and examined in a JEM 100CX electron microscope. In both rapidly solidified Al5Ir and Al5Pd alloys, the decagonal quasicrystal, with rosette or dendritic morphologies can be easily identified by its electron diffraction patterns(EDPs). The EDPs of the decagonal phase for the two alloys are quite similar. However, the existance of decagonal quasicrystal in the Al-Pt alloy has not been verified by our TEM study. It is probably for the reason that the cooling rate is not great enough for the Al5Pt alloy to form the decagonal phase. During the TEM study, a metastable hexagonal phase has been observed in the Al5Ir, Al5Pd and Al5Pt alloys. The lattic parameters calculated from the X-ray powder data of this phase are a=1.229 and c=2.647nm(Al-Pd) and a=1.231 and c=2.623nm(Al-Ir). The composition of this phase was determined by EDS analysis as Al4(Ir, Pd or Pt). It coexists with the decagonal phase in the alloys and transformed to other stable crystalline phases on heating to high temperature. A comparison between the EDPs of the hexagonal and the decagonal phase are shown in Fig.l. Fig. 1(a) is the EDPs of the decagonal phase in various orientions and the EDPs of the hexagonal phase are shown in Fig.1(b), in a similar arrangement as Fig.1(a). It can be clearly seen that the EDPs of the hexagonal phase, especially the distribution of strong spots, are quite similar to their partners of the decagonal quasicrystal in Fig.1(a). All the angles, shown in Fig.l, between two corresponding EDPs are very close to each other. All of these seem strongly to point out that a close structural relationshipexists between these two phases:[110]//d10 [001]//d2(D) //d2 (P)The structure of α-AlFeSi is well known [3] and the 54-atom Mackay icosahedron with double icosahedral shells in the α-AlFeSi structure [4] have been used to model the icosahedral quasicrystal structure. Fig.2(a) and (b) show, respectively, the [110] and [001] projections of the crystal structure of α- AlFeSi, and decagon-pentagons can easily be identified in the former and hexagons in the latter. In addition, the optical transforms of these projections show clearly decagons and hexagons of strong spots, quite similar to those in [110] and [001] EDPs in Fig.1(b). This not only proves the Al(Ir, Pt, Pd) metastable phase being icostructural with the α-AlFeSi phase but also explains the orientation relationship mentioned above.

1993 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 2499-2503 ◽  
Author(s):  
X.Z. Li ◽  
K.H. Kuo

Rapidly quenched Al86-xNi14Six (x = 0, 2, 6, and 10) alloys have been studied by means of transmission electron microscopy. Two-dimensional (2-D) decagonal quasicrystal with a periodicity of 1.6 nm along its tenfold axis was found in the rapidly quenched Al86Ni14 binary alloy. With the addition of some silicon, such as AlgoNi14Si6, the 2-D decagonal quasicrystal first transforms to a one-dimensional (1-D) quasicrystal that inherits the periodicity along the tenfold axis and has, in addition, translation periodicity in one of the twofold axes of the decagonal phase, and finally transforms to a new orthorhombic crystalline phase (a = 0.78, b = 1.62, and c = 1.48 nm). In the Al76Ni14Si10 ternary alloy, a 2-D decagonal quasicrystal with a periodicity of 0.4 nm and a coexisting crystalline phase with the “Al3Ni2” structure were found, and their orientational relationship has been determined.


Author(s):  
K.H. Kuo ◽  
H. Zhang

Decagonal quasicrystal is a two-dimensional one with a periodicity of about 1.2 or 1.6 nm along its tenfold rotation axis. It is known to exist in rapidly solidified Al-rich Al-Mn-Si and Al-Cr-Si alloys, sometimes coexisting with the bcc α-AlMnSi or cubic Al13Cr4Si4 phase. Both these two crystalline phases are known to have many icosahedral units in them. The structural similarity between the decagonal phase and the related bcc α-AlMnSi has been studied extensively lately.However, recently we have found a new base-centered orthorhombic phase with a=1.24, b=3.79, and c=1.23 nm coexisting with the decagonal phase to these alloys. Moreover, evidence of a continuous transformation from the latter to the former has been found by selected area electron diffraction. Fig. la is the tenfold electron diffraction pattern (EDP) of the decagonal quasicrystal with strong spots forming a series of concentric decagons. However, in the region close to the boundary to the crystal, the circle on which the inner 10 strong spots lie becomes an ellipse with its long axis in the arrowed direction (Fig. 1b). The closer to the boundary, the more the distortion of this decagon (Fig. 1c) and finally the EDP changes almost to a 2D crossgrid pattern of a base-centered crystal (a reciprocal unit cell is outlined in Fig. 1d).


Author(s):  
Atul S. Ramani ◽  
Earle R. Ryba ◽  
Paul R. Howell

The “decagonal” phase in the Al-Co-Cu system of nominal composition Al65CO15Cu20 first discovered by He et al. is especially suitable as a topic of investigation since it has been claimed that it is thermodynamically stable and is reported to be periodic in the dimension perpendicular to the plane of quasiperiodic 10-fold symmetry. It can thus be expected that it is an important link between fully periodic and fully quasiperiodic phases. In the present paper, we report important findings of our transmission electron microscope (TEM) study that concern deviations from ideal decagonal symmetry of selected area diffraction patterns (SADPs) obtained from several “decagonal” phase crystals and also observation of a lattice of main reflections on the 10-fold and 2-fold SADPs that implies complete 3-dimensional lattice periodicity and the fundamentally incommensurate nature of the “decagonal” phase. We also present diffraction evidence for a new transition phase that can be classified as being one-dimensionally quasiperiodic if the lattice of main reflections is ignored.


Author(s):  
Ted Janssen ◽  
Gervais Chapuis ◽  
Marc de Boissieu

The law of rational indices to describe crystal faces was one of the most fundamental law of crystallography and is strongly linked to the three-dimensional periodicity of solids. This chapter describes how this fundamental law has to be revised and generalized in order to include the structures of aperiodic crystals. The generalization consists in using for each face a number of integers, with the number corresponding to the rank of the structure, that is, the number of integer indices necessary to characterize each of the diffracted intensities generated by the aperiodic system. A series of examples including incommensurate multiferroics, icosahedral crystals, and decagonal quaiscrystals illustrates this topic. Aperiodicity is also encountered in surfaces where the same generalization can be applied. The chapter discusses aperiodic crystal morphology, including icosahedral quasicrystal morphology, decagonal quasicrystal morphology, and aperiodic crystal surfaces; magnetic quasiperiodic systems; aperiodic photonic crystals; mesoscopic quasicrystals, and the mineral calaverite.


2003 ◽  
Vol 437-438 ◽  
pp. 407-410 ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Zhou ◽  
R.K. Sadangi ◽  
Bernard H. Kear ◽  
W.R. Cannon

1991 ◽  
Vol 134 ◽  
pp. 1170-1174
Author(s):  
Q Li ◽  
E Johnson ◽  
A Johansen ◽  
L.D Yu ◽  
S Steenstrup ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petar Popčević ◽  
Ante Bilušić ◽  
Kristijan Velebit ◽  
Ana Smontara

ABSTRACTTransport properties (thermal conductivity, electrical resistivity and thermopower) of decagonal quasicrystal d-AlCoNi, and approximant phases Y-AlCoNi, o-Al13Co4, m-Al13Fe4, m-Al13(Fe,Ni)4 and T-AlMnFe have been reviewed. Among all presented alloys the stacking direction (periodic for decagonal quasicrystals) is the most conductive one for the charge and heat transport, and the in/out-of-plane anisotropy is much larger than the in-plane anisotropy. There is a strong relationship between periodicity length along stacking direction and anisotropy of transport properties in both quasicrystals and their approximants suggesting a decrease of the anisotropy with increasing number of stacking layers.


1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 1359-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.V.S. Sastry ◽  
C. Suryanarayana

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document