scholarly journals Determination of different positioning errors in digital panoramic radiography: A retrospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Swetha Kattimani ◽  
Pragati Kempwade ◽  
D. N. S. V. Ramesh ◽  
Amit Byatnal ◽  
Saba Nasreen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Positioning Errors ◽  
Digital Panoramic Radiography

Organ doses and subjective image quality of indirect digital panoramic radiography

2001 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 308-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Gijbels ◽  
G Sanderink ◽  
C Bou Serhal ◽  
H Pauwels ◽  
R Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Organ Doses ◽  
Subjective Image Quality ◽  
Digital Panoramic Radiography

Determination of teicoplanin trough concentration target and appropriate total dose during the first 3 days: a retrospective study in patients with MRSA infections

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuaki Matsumoto ◽  
Naoko Kanazawa ◽  
Tomohide Fukamizu ◽  
Akari Shigemi ◽  
Keiko Yaji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Total Dose ◽  
Trough Concentration

Determination of a new computed tomography method for measuring the glenoid version and comparing with a reference method. Radio-anatomical and retrospective study

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Andrin ◽  
Charbel Macaron ◽  
Pierre Pottecher ◽  
Pierre Martz ◽  
Emmanuel Baulot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Reference Method ◽  
Glenoid Version ◽  
Tomography Method

scholarly journals Reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vilson Lacerda Brasileiro Junior ◽  
Aníbal Henrique Barbosa Luna ◽  
Marcelo Augusto Oliveira de Sales ◽  
Tânia Lemos Coelho Rodrigues ◽  
Priscilla Lopes da Fonseca Abrantes Sarmento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Carotid Artery ◽  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Carotid Arteries ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Digital Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mcnemar’S Test ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Objective The present study evaluated the reliability of digital panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications. Materials and Methods Thirty-five patients under high-risk for development of carotid artery calcifications who had digital panoramic radiography were referred to undergo ultrasonography. Thus, 70 arteries were assessed by both methods. The main parameters utilized to evaluate the panoramic radiography reliability in the diagnosis of carotid artery calcifications were accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of this method as compared with ultrasonography. Additionally, the McNemar's test was utilized to verify whether there was a statistically significant difference between digital panoramic radiography and ultrasonography. Results Ultrasonography demonstrated carotid artery calcifications in 17 (48.57%) patients. Such individuals presented with a total of 29 (41.43%) carotid arteries affected by calcification. Radiography was accurate in 71.43% (n = 50) of cases evaluated. The degree of sensitivity of this method was 37.93%, specificity of 95.12% and positive predictive value of 84.61%. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed between the methods evaluated in their capacity to diagnose carotid artery calcifications. Conclusion Digital panoramic radiography should not be indicated as a method of choice in the investigation of carotid artery calcifications.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Image Magnification in Digital Panoramic Radiography

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
Maryam Paknahad ◽  
Mahvash Hasani ◽  
Mahsa Hasani ◽  
Alireza Evazpour ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Image Magnification ◽  
Digital Panoramic Radiography
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document