scholarly journals Trauma Team Training: Multidisciplinary Training for Trauma Management

MedEdPORTAL ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Demian Szyld ◽  
Sarah E. Peyre ◽  
Zara R. Cooper ◽  
Diane Miller ◽  
Yvonne Michaud ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence M. Gillman ◽  
Doug Martin ◽  
Paul T. Engels ◽  
Peter Brindley ◽  
Sandy Widder ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rune Bruhn Jakobsen ◽  
Sarah Frandsen Gran ◽  
Bergsvein Grimsmo ◽  
Kari Arntzen ◽  
Erik Fosse ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e009911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Härgestam ◽  
Marie Lindkvist ◽  
Maritha Jacobsson ◽  
Christine Brulin ◽  
Magnus Hultin

2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. S175-S176 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Boulger ◽  
J. Ward ◽  
E. Jackson ◽  
D. Eiferman ◽  
D. Bahner
Keyword(s):  

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 551
Author(s):  
Noonan ◽  
Olaussen ◽  
Mathew ◽  
Mitra ◽  
Smit ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Major trauma centres manage severely injured patients using multi-disciplinary teams but the evidence-base that targeted Trauma Team Training (TTT) improves patients’ outcomes is unclear. This systematic review aimed to identify the association between the implementation of TTT programs and patient outcomes. Methods: We searched OVID Medline, PubMed and The Cochrane Library (CENTRAL) from the date of the database commencement until 10 of April 2019 for a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and keywords relating to TTT and clinical outcomes. Reference lists of appraised studies were also screened for relevant articles. We extracted data on the study setting, type and details about the learners, as well as clinical outcomes of mortality and/or time to critical interventions. A meta-analysis of the association between TTT and mortality was conducted using a random effects model. Results: The search yielded 1136 unique records and abstracts, of which 18 full texts were reviewed. Nine studies met final inclusion, of which seven were included in a meta-analysis of the primary outcome. There were no randomised controlled trials. TTT was not associated with mortality (Pooled overall odds ratio (OR) 0.83; 95% Confidence Interval; 0.64–1.09). TTT was associated with improvements in time to operating theatre and time to first computerized tomography (CT) scanning. Conclusions: Despite few publications related to TTT, its introduction was associated with improvements in time to critical interventions. Whether such improvements can translate to improvements in patient outcomes remains unknown. Further research focusing on the translation of standardised trauma team reception “actions” into TTT is required to assess the association between TTT and patient outcome.


2018 ◽  
pp. 151-160
Author(s):  
Abdullah Jibawi ◽  
Mohamed Baguneid ◽  
Arnab Bhowmick

Major trauma is defined as an injury or a combination of injuries that are life-threatening and could be life changing because it may result in long-term disability. The impact of trauma is huge. Injuries from accidental trauma worldwide causes moderate to severe disability in > 45m people each year. Trauma is the biggest killer of people age < 45y. UK annual trauma cost is ~£0.35b in immediate treatment; subsequent financial costs are unknown. UK annual lost economic output due to major trauma is ~£3.5b. Trauma management is challenging. Up to 40% of trauma patients have injuries that are initially missed, and up to 20% of these are clinically significant. The trauma team should be appropriately formed to achieve the assigned level of care and prioritize management. Guidelines for specific organ trauma management should be followed and practice standardized to ensure the best outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document