scholarly journals OPTIMAL ORGANOPROTECTION, CONTROL OF bLOOD PRESSURE AND METAbOLIC DISORDER  WITH THE FIxED COMbINATION OF LISINOPRIL, AMLODIPINE AND ROSUVASTATIN IN SYSTEMIC  HYPERTENSION

2018 ◽  
pp. 49-55
Author(s):  
S. V. Nedogoda ◽  
E. V. Chumachek ◽  
A. A. Ledyaeva ◽  
V. V. Tsoma ◽  
A. S. Salasyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Insulin Resistance ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Pulse Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Antihypertensive Therapy ◽  
Pulse Wave ◽  
Fixed Combination ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
Resistance Index ◽  
Systemic Hypertension

Aim. Evaluation of the ability of the fixed combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin (Equamer) in achievement of additional angioprotection in patients with systemic arterial hypertension (AH) and high pulse wave velocity (PWV), regardless of previous antihypertensive therapy (AHT).Material and methods. To the open multicenter observational study 24 weeks duration, 60 patients included, taking double AHT during 6 months. All participants underwent ambulatory 24 hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring, applanation tonometry (augmentation index and central BP), pulse wave velocity assessment, laboratory tests (lipids, fasting glucose, insulin resistance index (HOMA), leptin, high sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) before and after transition to the fixed combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin (Equamer).Results. By the data from office BP measurement, after transition of patients from the double combinations to fixed combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin, there was additional decrease of systolic BP (SBP) by 14,3% and diastolic BP (DBP) by 18,5%. By the data from ABPM, decrease of SBP was 16,1%, and DBP — 21,8%. Combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin decreased PWV by 14,4%, augmentation index by 14,5%, central SBP by 8,1% (p<0,01 for all comparisons with baseline). Fixed combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin made it to decrease low density lipoproteides by 44%, triglycerides by 36,1% and increase of high density lipoproteides by 10,3% (p<0,01 for all with baseline). Usage of combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin showed significant decrease of insulin resistance, hsCRP and leptin levels.Conclusion. Fixed combination of lisinopril, amlodipine and rosuvastatin makes it to better control BP, improve vascular elasticity parameters (augmentation index, PWV, central BP) and facilitates the improvement of lipid and glucose metabolism, decrease of inflammation, leptin resistance in patients taking at baseline double antihypertensive therapy.

scholarly journals Improving blood pressure control, organoprotection and metabolic disorders correction in patients with hypertension switching from diuretic-based combinations to fixed combination lisinopril + amlodipine + rosuvastatin

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-31
Author(s):  
S V Nedogoda ◽  
E V Chumachek ◽  
A A Ledyaeva ◽  
V V Tsoma ◽  
A S Salasyuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Pulse Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Antihypertensive Therapy ◽  
Pulse Wave ◽  
Fixed Combination ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Resistance Index ◽  
Applanation Tonometry

The aim of the study was to assess the possibility of fixed combination Lisinopril + amlodipine + rozuvastatin to improve arterial elesticity in patients with hypertension and high pulse wave velocity, despite previous diuretic-based combination antihypertensive therapy. Materials and methods. In an open, observational study duration of 24 weeks was included 60 patients on previous diuretic-based combination antihypertensive therapy. All participants underwent 24-hour blood pressure monitoring, applanation tonometry (augmentation index and central blood pressure), pulse wave velocity measurement, laboratory tests (lipid profile, fasting glucose, insulin resistance index - NOMA), leptin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein before and after the switching to a fixed combination of lisinopril + amlodipine + rosuvastatin. Results. According to measurements of office blood pressure switching of patients on double combinations based on diuretics to a fixed combination of lisinopril + amlodipine + rosuvastatin, a further decrease in systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 13.7% and diastolic BP (DBP) by 18.8% was observed. According to the ABPM, the decline in the average daily SBP was 15.8%, DBP - 22.5%, average SBP - 16.2%, DBP - 19.8%. The combination of lisinopril + amlodipine + rosuvastatin reduced PWV by 15.9%, augmentation index by 13.5%, central SBP by 8.4% (p

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF STATIN ADDED TO ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY ON ARTERIAL STIFFNESS IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS AT HIGH CARDIOVASCULAR RISK

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 27-32
Author(s):  
O. V. Fedorishina ◽  
K. V. Protasov ◽  
A. M. Torunova
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Pulse Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Antihypertensive Therapy ◽  
Pulse Wave ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Hypertensive Patients ◽  
Aortic Blood Pressure

Background.Little is known about the effect of statins addition to standard antihypertensive therapy on blood pressure level and vascular stiffness in high-risk hypertensive patients.The aimof the study was to assess the dynamics of vascular stiffness in hypertensive patients of high or very high cardiovascular risk under the influence of rosuvastatin addition to combined two-component amlodipine and lisinopril antihypertensive therapy.Materials and methods.We investigated 60 hypertensive patients who were randomized into two groups: the 1st group received a fixed amlodipine/lisinopril combination, the 2nd one followed the same regimen of therapy with addition of 20 mg rosuvastatin. Mean office and ambulatory blood pressure as well as central aortic blood pressure and pulse wave velocity were evaluated in both groups before and after 24-week follow-up period.Results.At end of follow-up period the office and average daily blood pressure significantly decreased in both groups, with more prominent office diastolic blood pressure decline in the 2nd one. The central aortic blood pressure equally decreased in both groups. The augmentation index significantly reduced in both groups, mostly in the 2nd one. The carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity declined in both groups to the same extent. The carotid-radial pulse wave velocity decreased statistically only in the second group.Conclusions.Addition of rosuvastatin to a fixed amlodipine/lisinopril combination in high/very high cardiovascular risk hypertensive patients was accompanied by more pronounced decline of diastolic blood pressure and augmentation index, as well as significantly reduction of pulse wave velocity.

Volume status and arterial blood pressures are associated with arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 378-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alper Erdan ◽  
Abdullah Ozkok ◽  
Nadir Alpay ◽  
Vakur Akkaya ◽  
Alaattin Yildiz
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Arterial Stiffness ◽  
Pulse Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Pulse Pressure ◽  
Pulse Wave ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
Mean Blood Pressure ◽  
Aortic Blood ◽  
Aortic Blood Pressure

Background: Arterial stiffness is a strong predictor of mortality in hemodialysis patients. In this study, we aimed to investigate possible relations of arterial stiffness with volume status determined by bioimpedance analysis and aortic blood pressure parameters. Also, effects of a single hemodialysis session on these parameters were studied. Methods: A total of 75 hemodialysis patients (M/F: 43/32; mean age: 53 ± 17) were enrolled. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, and aortic pulse pressure were measured by applanation tonometry before and after hemodialysis. Extracellular fluid and total body fluid volumes were determined by bioimpedance analysis. Results: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (9.30 ± 3.30 vs 7.59 ± 2.66 m/s, p < 0.001), augmentation index (24.52 ± 9.42 vs 20.28 ± 10.19, p < 0.001), and aortic pulse pressure (38 ± 14 vs 29 ± 8 mmHg, p < 0.001) significantly decreased after hemodialysis. Pre-dialysis carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was associated with age (r2 = 0.15, p = 0.01), total cholesterol (r2 = 0.06, p = 0.02), peripheral mean blood pressure (r2 = 0.10, p = 0.005), aortic-mean blood pressure (r2 = 0.06, p = 0.02), aortic pulse pressure (r2 = 0.14, p = 0.001), and extracellular fluid/total body fluid (r2 = 0.30, p < 0.0001). Pre-dialysis augmentation index was associated with total cholesterol (r2 = 0.06, p = 0,02), aortic-mean blood pressure (r2 = 0.16, p < 0.001), and aortic pulse pressure (r2 = 0.22, p < 0.001). Δcarotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was associated with Δaortic-mean blood pressure (r2 = 0.06, p = 0.02) and inversely correlated with baseline carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (r2 = 0.29, p < 0.001). Pre-dialysis Δaugmentation index was significantly associated with Δaortic-mean blood pressure (r2 = 0.09, p = 0.009) and Δaortic pulse pressure (r2 = 0.06, p = 0.03) and inversely associated with baseline augmentation index (r2 = 0.14, p = 0.001). In multiple linear regression analysis (adjusted R2 = 0.46, p < 0.001) to determine the factors predicting Log carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, extracellular fluid/total body fluid and peripheral mean blood pressure significantly predicted Log carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (p = 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Conclusion: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, and aortic pulse pressure significantly decreased after hemodialysis. Arterial stiffness was associated with both peripheral and aortic blood pressure. Furthermore, reduction in arterial stiffness parameters was related to reduction in aortic blood pressure. Pre-dialysis carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was associated with volume status determined by bioimpedance analysis. Volume control may improve not only the aortic blood pressure measurements but also arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients.

scholarly journals Correlation between office and 24-hour ambulatory measures of pulse wave velocity, central augmentation index and central blood pressure

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annelise M. G. Paiva ◽  
Andréa A. Brandão ◽  
Audes D. M. Feitosa ◽  
Gabriela C. A. Novais ◽  
Emanuelle M. Cantarelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Pulse Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Pulse Wave ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
Central Blood Pressure

scholarly journals Variation in carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity, augmentation pressure and augmentation index during different phases of menstrual cycle

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 27-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nudrath Kahkashan ◽  
Mehnaaz Sameera Arifuddin ◽  
Mohammed Abdul Hannan Hazari ◽  
Safia Sultana ◽  
Farah Fatima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Menstrual Cycle ◽  
Pulse Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Pulse Wave ◽  
Diastolic Pressure ◽  
Augmentation Index ◽  
Arterial Compliance ◽  
Systolic Pressure ◽  
Augmentation Pressure

Physiological variation of estrogen and progesterone during menstrual cycle is well known. They not only have an effect on blood pressure control, but also seem to have a role in regulating arterial compliance. This study was done to find out whether there are any changes in central arterial parameters during different phases of menstrual cycle. Thirty female subjects in the age group of 18-22 years with normal, regular menstrual cycles participated in this prospective observational study at our teaching hospital. Anthropometric parameters were recorded. Blood pressure in all 4 limbs was recorded using cardiovascular risk analyzer-Periscope™ on Day 3rd to 5th (follicular phase), Day 12th to 14th (ovulation phase), Day 22nd to 24th (luteal phase) of their menstrual cycle. We collected blood samples during these three phases for estimation of estradiol and progesterone by ELISA technique. Analysis of variance and correlation statistics were done using SPSS 17.0 statistical software. No significant statistical changes were observed in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, pulse pressure, aortic systolic pressure, aortic diastolic pressure, aortic augmentation pressure, aortic index and pulse wave velocity during the three recorded phases of the menstrual cycle. There are many studies which correlate changes in peripheral artery blood pressure with different phases of menstrual cycle. But there is scarcity in data available which correlates central arterial pressures and arterial stiffness with natural hormonal variations in different phases of menstrual cycle. However, our results show that although there are subtle changes in blood pressure parameters along with estrogen and progesterone levels throughout the menstrual cycle, yet these were not statistically significant.

scholarly journals Blood pressure level and arterial stiffness parameters role in prediction of the antihypertensive therapy efficacy escape phenomenon

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 49-54
Author(s):  
O O Mikhailova ◽  
E M Elfimova ◽  
A Yu Litvin ◽  
A N Rogoza
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Pulse Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Antihypertensive Therapy ◽  
Pulse Wave ◽  
Stiffness Index ◽  
Wall Stiffness ◽  
Artery Stiffness ◽  
Group 1

The aim of the study was to evaluate blood pressure (BP) level and vessel wall stiffness parameters role in antihypertensive therapy (AHT) escape phenomena development on the background of primarily effective AHT use. Materials and methods. Data from 102 patients with arterial hypertension level 1-3, stage I-II were analyzed. All patients underwent individual AHT adjustment for 2-3 weeks (adjustment period). At the end of the adjustment period the therapy effectiveness was evaluated with clinical BP measurement (target BP values less than 140/90 mm hg) and 24-hour BP monitoring (target daily BP values less than 130/80 mm hg). The study included only those patients who reached target clinical and daily BP values on the background of 2-3 antihypertensive drugs use at the end of the adjustment period. At the beginning of the observation period after effective AHT was used carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was evaluated with applanation tonometry. For the purpose of timely escape phenomena diagnosis clinical BP measurement and 24-hour BP monitoring were performed in 1, 3, and 6 months after the trial start in all patients. Results. After 6 months of observation patients were divided in 2 groups: group 1 included 34 patients with AHT escape phenomena, group 2 - 68 patients with stable, controlled AH. In group 1 on the background of effective AHT use at the beginning of observation higher levels of following measures were observed: clinical systolic BP - SBP (125.2±11.3 mm hg vs 119.7±11.7 mm hg, p=0.021), daily SBP (128.0±3.3 mm hg vs 121.2±7.4 mm hg, p=0.000), daily average SBP (131.6±4.9 mm hg vs 125.3±8.5 mm hg, р=0.000), night average SBP (120.4±8.5 mm hg vs 111.8±8.6 mm hg, р=0.000), daily pulse BP 50.2±4.8 mm hg vs 44.2±7.6 mm hg, p=0.000), daily mean brachial artery stiffness index - ASI (161.9±28.3 mm hg vs 142.2±24.5 mm p=0.000), carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (11.6±2.5 m/s vs 10.5±2.3 m/s, p=0.029). In single-factor logistic regression models all these measures were shown to have predictive value in AHT escape phenomena development. According to multifactor logistic regression analysis that included carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity more than 10.8 m/s, daily mean ASI>137, daily SBP>124 mm hg, and daily pulse BP>46 mm hg, the only independent predictor on the background of effective AHT at the beginning of the observation was daily SBP>124 mm hg (odds ratio 19.1, 95% confidence interval 3.6-101.8; p=0.0004). Conclusion. BP level and artery stiffness index measured on the background of effective AHT at the beginning of the observation are predictors for escape phenomena development and can be used for effectiveness and required frequency of therapy management prognosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document