scholarly journals The predictive value of preprocedural laboratory data in patients with coronary artery restenosis in various types of stents

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 54-59
Author(s):  
D. V. Shames ◽  
A. S. Galyavich ◽  
Z. M. Galeeva ◽  
L. V. Baleeva

Aim.To identify the effect of preprocedural laboratory parameters on the occurrence of in-stent restenosis in various types of stents, to assess the significance of gender, age and various forms of coronary artery disease (CAD) as risk factors for coronary artery restenosis after stenting.Material and methods.The study included 436 patients with CAD, which were divided into 2 groups. The study group included 218 patients with in-stent restenosis. The control group consisted of 218 patients with CAD without in-stent restenosis. Inclusion criteria were acute or chronic form of CAD, age 45-74 years, CAG and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with emergency or planned stenting of the native coronary artery, repeated CAG in history due to signs/symptoms of myocardial ischemia. Exclusion criteria: age younger than 45 years and over 74 years, coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), cancer, autoimmune disease, anemia, liver failure, chronic kidney disease S4-S5, recent blood transfusion, hypo-or hyperthyroidism.Results.According to the study, the risk in-stent restenosis is 5,2 times higher in patients in the 65-69 years age group and 9,9 times higher in the 70-74 years age group compared with the group of young patients (45-49 years). In-stent restenosis is 2,7 times more common in men than in women. Predictors of restenosis were red cell distribution width, mean platelet volume, Gensini score with OR 1,5; 1,4; 1,1; 1,5, respectively.Conclusion.Risk factors for coronary artery restenosis after stenting are markers of chronic inflammation, such as the red cell distribution width, mean platelet volume. The risk of restenosis is higher in the male population. In old age, the risk of restenosis increases, however, young people and middle-aged people do not differ in risk of in-stent restenosis.

Platelets ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alparslan Kurtul ◽  
Sani Namik Murat ◽  
Mikail Yarlioglues ◽  
Mustafa Duran ◽  
Muhammed Karadeniz ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hülya Yiğit Özay ◽  
Zeliha Aslı Demir ◽  
Eda Balcı ◽  
Melike Kaya Bahçecitapar

INTRODUCTION: The effects of midazolam-based intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and sevoflurane-based inhalation anesthesia (SEVO) maintenance on postoperative hematological parameters were compared in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. METHODS: The 100 patients included in the study were divided into two groups according to the anesthesia management: All patients' anesthesia inductions were performed with 10 μgkg-1 fentanyl, 0.15 mgkg-1 midazolam, and 0.8 mgkg-1 rocuronium. Anesthesia was maintained with total intravenous anesthesia in the TIVA group patients, while sevoflurane was used in the SEVO group patients. Demographic, clinical, operative data, red cell distribution width (RDW), and mean platelet volume (MPV) values were recorded. RESULTS: Except that the extubation time was shorter in the SEVO group, no difference was observed between the groups in terms of all these variables. There was a significant increase in postoperative RDW and MPV measurements in both groups. Postoperative RDW value was lower in the inhalation anesthesia group compared to the TIVA group (p=0.013). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In our study, RDW was found to be lower in the inhalation anesthesia group, indicating less inflammation. There was no difference in terms of postoperative complications and mortality.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47
Author(s):  
Antonio Pinna ◽  
Tiziana Porcu ◽  
Jacopo Marzano ◽  
Francesco Boscia ◽  
Panagiotis Paliogiannis ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document