Do I practice what I preach? Contraception use in North American medical students

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (5) ◽  
pp. 491-493
Author(s):  
Deborah Landis Lewis ◽  
Miriam Cremer
Contraception ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 459-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tami S. Rowen ◽  
James F. Smith ◽  
Michael L. Eisenberg ◽  
Benjamin N. Breyer ◽  
Eleanor A. Drey ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 2391-2400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin N. Breyer ◽  
James F. Smith ◽  
Michael L. Eisenberg ◽  
Kathryn A. Ando ◽  
Tami S. Rowen ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 3363-3369 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Smith ◽  
Benjamin N. Breyer ◽  
Alan W. Shindel

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (12) ◽  
pp. 3909-3917 ◽  
Author(s):  
James F. Smith ◽  
Benjamin N. Breyer ◽  
Michael L. Eisenberg ◽  
Ira D. Sharlip ◽  
Alan W. Shindel

2011 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan W. Shindel ◽  
Michael L. Eisenberg ◽  
Benjamin N. Breyer ◽  
Ira D. Sharlip ◽  
James F. Smith

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evelyn Lockhart ◽  
Michael Corrin ◽  
Paula James ◽  
Ric Lowe ◽  
Jodie Jenkinson

Physicians have difficulty recognizing and diagnosing disorders of primary hemostasis. The root of this may lie in their education, where students are often taught hemostasis using static graphics. We aimed to create a didactic animation on primary hemostasis for medical students to be used in North American medical schools. To promote widespread use of the animation, we surveyed hemostasis educators from Canada and the US on the animation’s learning objectives. The animation’s script and storyboard were developed using the Animation Processing Model (APM), a psychological processing model that addresses the perceptual limitations of learners. This animation is the first biomedical animation to use the APM in its design. Furthermore, this is the first didactic hemostasis animation which sought peer consensus for its learning objectives.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J Papadimos ◽  
Stuart J Murray

In his six 1983 lectures published under the title, Fearless Speech (2001), Michel Foucault developed the theme of free speech and its relation to frankness, truth-telling, criticism, and duty. Derived from the ancient Greek word parrhesia, Foucault's analysis of free speech is relevant to the mentoring of medical students. This is especially true given the educational and social need to transform future physicians into able citizens who practice a fearless freedom of expression on behalf of their patients, the public, the medical profession, and themselves in the public and political arena. In this paper, we argue that Foucault's understanding of free speech, or parrhesia, should be read as an ethical response to the American Medical Association's recent educational effort, Initiative to Transform Medical Education (ITME): Recommendations for change in the system of medical education (2007). In this document, the American Medical Association identifies gaps in medical education, emphasizing the need to enhance health system safety and quality, to improve education in training institutions, and to address the inadequacy of physician preparedness in new content areas. These gaps, and their relationship to the ITME goal of promoting excellence in patient care by implementing reform in the US system of medical education, call for a serious consideration and use of Foucault's parrhesia in the way that medical students are trained and mentored.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document