scholarly journals Maximum phonation times and vital capacity in dysphonic women

Revista CEFAC ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 632-639
Author(s):  
Aline Costa Leite ◽  
Mara Keli Christmann ◽  
Carla Franco Hoffmann ◽  
Carla Aparecida Cielo

ABSTRACT Objective: to verify the correlation between vital capacity and maximum phonation times of /ė/ (unvoiced) and /s/, as well as compare and relate them with the professional voice use and age in women with functional or organic-functional dysphonia. Methods: a retrospective research with 524 records of dysphonic patients from a school clinic, including young adult women with a speech-language diagnosis of functional or organic-functional dysphonia based on medical reports. Neurological and psychiatric alterations, previous speech therapy treatment, symptoms of flu or allergies on the day of evaluation, pulmonary disease, organic dysphonia diagnosis, and hearing loss, were excluded. The sample resulted in 14 women with functional dysphonia and 21 with organic-functional dysphonia. Data on professional voice use, as well as results for vital capacity and maximum phonation times were collected. The data were statistically analyzed at a 5% significance level. Results: There was a positive correlation for both groups of dysphonic patients between the maximum phonation times of /ė/ and of /s/, as well as the maximum phonation times of /ė/, /s/, and vital capacity. Higher values for vital capacity and maximum times of /s/ and /ė/ for voice professionals were seen. The maximum phonation times of /ė/ were lower than those of /s/. Conclusion: as the maximum phonation times of /ė/ increased, the maximum phonation times of /s/ and the vital capacity also augmented in both groups, demonstrating the interrelation among these variables; there was no relation with the other variables studied.

Author(s):  
Emily Holcombe ◽  
Jennifer Manlove ◽  
Erum Ikramullah

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fidia Novenz Wahidah ◽  
Trida Cynthia ◽  
Anita Zulkaida

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-03
Author(s):  
Hemlata Munjappa ◽  
◽  
Smita Shinde ◽  
Meena Parekh ◽  
Atish Pagar ◽  
...  

Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 290
Author(s):  
Katarzyna Tkaczyszyn ◽  
Ernest Kuchar ◽  
Ewa Augustynowicz ◽  
Leszek Szenborn

Background: We investigated the impact of a single unstructured educational lecture about vaccinations on the vaccine confidence in volunteer participants. Methods: We conducted a survey-based study during a series of open meetings related to pregnancy and parenting. Before and after the pediatrician’s lecture related to vaccinations, listeners completed the visual analogue scales (VAS, 0–15 cm), evaluating (1) self-declared knowledge on vaccinations and (2) how they perceive the safety and efficacy of this preventive method. Results: In total, 484 women aged 30 ± 4 years participated in the lecture (pregnant = 68%; ≥1 children = 56%). Participants declared to have more comprehensive knowledge on preventive vaccinations and perceived vaccines to be safer and more useful (the role for the immunity) after vs. before the lecture (median VAS: 10.4 vs. 7.2, 10.8 vs. 8.7, and 11.0 vs. 10.4 cm, all p < 0.001). Importantly, the prevalence of vaccine-related adverse events was also assessed as being higher after the lecture (median VAS: 9.9 vs. 8.0 cm, p < 0.001). The increase in self-declared knowledge on vaccinations and perceived need for vaccinations (delta VAS—VAS after minus before the lecture, expressed as % of baseline) was lower among participants who rated the lecture less vs. more useful. Importantly, both participants who liked vs. did not like the lecture comparably rated vaccines safer after vs. before the lecture (delta VAS (median, interquartile range): 16% (0–39%) vs. 18% (2–42%), p = 0.39). Conclusions: An educational lecture on vaccinations positively impacts vaccine confidence in young adult women. Irrespective of the subjective rating of the lecture, all listeners perceived vaccinations to be safer after vs. before the speech.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn J. Heckman ◽  
Teja Munshi ◽  
Susan Darlow ◽  
Jacqueline D. Kloss ◽  
Sharon L. Manne ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document