scholarly journals Compensation technique for environmental and light source power variations applied in a polymer optical fiber curvature sensor for wearable devices

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaldo Gomes Leal-Junior ◽  
Anselmo Frizera ◽  
Maria José Pontes
2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (12) ◽  
pp. 125103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaldo Gomes Leal-Junior ◽  
Anselmo Frizera-Neto ◽  
Maria José Pontes ◽  
Thomaz Rodrigues Botelho

Sensors ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Letícia Avellar ◽  
Arnaldo Leal-Junior ◽  
Carlos Marques ◽  
Anselmo Frizera

This paper presents the analysis of an intensity variation polymer optical fiber (POF)-based angle sensor performance, i.e., sensitivity, hysteresis and determination coefficient ( R 2 ), using cyclic transparent optical polymer (CYTOP) fiber. The analysis consisted of two approaches: influence of different light source central wavelengths (430 nm, 530 nm, 660 nm, 870 nm and 950 nm) and influence of different angular velocities ( 0.70 rad/s, 0.87 rad/s, 1.16 rad/s, 1.75 rad/s and 3.49 rad/s). The first approach aimed to select the source which resulted in the most suitable performance regarding highest sensitivity and linearity while maintaining lowest hysteresis, through the figure of merit. Thereafter, the analysis of different angular velocities was performed to evaluate the influence of velocity in the curvature sensor performance. Then, a discrete angular velocity compensation was proposed in order to reduce the root-mean-square error (RMSE) of responses for different angular velocities. Ten tests for each analysis were performed with angular range of 0 ∘ to 50 ∘ , based on knee and ankle angle range during the gait. The curvature sensor was applied in patterns simulating the knee and ankle during the gait. Results show repeatability and the best sensor performance for λ = 950 nm in the first analysis and show high errors for high angular velocities ( w = 3.49 rad/s) in the second analysis, which presented up to 50 % angular error. The uncompensated RMSE was high for all velocities ( 6.45 ∘ to 12.41 ∘ ), whereas the compensated RMSE decreased up to 74 % ( 1.67 ∘ to 3.62 ∘ ). The compensated responses of application tests showed maximum error of 5.52 ∘ and minimum of 1.06 ∘ , presenting a decrease of mean angular error up to 30 ∘ when compared with uncompensated responses.


2016 ◽  
Vol 223 ◽  
pp. 30-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Rodríguez-Schwendtner ◽  
M.C. Navarrete ◽  
N. Díaz-Herrera ◽  
Ó. Esteban ◽  
A. González-Cano

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (24) ◽  
pp. 6927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaldo G. Leal-Junior ◽  
Anselmo Frizera ◽  
Leticia M. Avellar ◽  
Maria José Pontes

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (17) ◽  
pp. 7085-7092 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaldo G. Leal-Junior ◽  
Anselmo Frizera ◽  
Laura Vargas-Valencia ◽  
Wilian M. dos Santos ◽  
Antonio P. L. Bo ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arnaldo G. Leal-Junior ◽  
Anselmo Frizera ◽  
Carlos Marques ◽  
Maria José Pontes

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (11) ◽  
pp. 960-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Fung Jeff Pun ◽  
Zhengyong Liu ◽  
Ming Leung Vincent Tse ◽  
Xin Cheng ◽  
Xiao Ming Tao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document