scholarly journals IMPROVED EXPERIMENTAL MODEL TO EVALUATE SUBMUCOSAL INJECTION SOLUTIONS FOR ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-265
Author(s):  
Kendi YAMAZAKI ◽  
Fauze MALUF-FILHO ◽  
Vitor Alves Pessoa da COSTA ◽  
Fernanda Cristina Simões PESSORRUSSO ◽  
Fabio Yuji HONDO ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Experimental Model ◽  
Gastric Wall ◽  
Animal Experiments ◽  
Complete Removal ◽  
Gastric Body ◽  
Midline Laparotomy ◽  
Submucosal Injection ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Increased Risk

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection carries an increased risk of bleeding and perforation. The creation of a long lasting submucosal cushion is essential for the safe and complete removal of the lesion. There is not a suitable experimental model for evaluation of the durability of the cushioning effect of different solutions. Aim: To describe an improved experimental model to evaluate submucosal injection solutions. Methods: A total of four domestic pigs were employed to evaluate two different submucosal fluid solutions in the gastric submucosa. After midline laparotomy, the anterior gastric wall was incised from the gastric body to the antrum and its mucosal surface was exposed by flipping inside out the incised gastric wall. Two different solutions (10% mannitol and normal saline) were injected in the submucosa of the anterior wall of the distal gastric body. All submucosal cushions were injected until they reach the same size, standardized as 1.0 cm in height and 2.0 cm in diameter. A caliper and a ruler were employed to guarantee accuracy of the measurements. Results: All four animal experiments were completed. All submucosal cushions had the exact same size measured with caliper and a ruler. By using the mannitol solution, the mean duration of the submucosal cushion was longer than the saline solution: 20 and 22 min (mean, 21 min) vs 5 and 6 min (mean, 5.5 min) Conclusions: This experimental model is simple and evaluate the duration, size, and effect of the submucosal cushion, making it more reliable than other models that employ resected porcine stomachs or endoscopic images in live porcine models.

ELECTROMAGNETIC ASSISTED ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION IS MORE EFFICIENT THAN WATER-JET ASSISTED AND CONVENTIONAL ESD IN EXPERIMENTAL MODEL

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Sánchez Alonso ◽  
E Rodríguez Sánchez ◽  
E de la Santa Belda ◽  
P Olivencia Palomar ◽  
R Salmoral Luque ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Experimental Model ◽  
Water Jet ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

scholarly journals Fibrin glue: Novel submucosal injection agent for endoscopic submucosal dissection

2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (03) ◽  
pp. E319-E323
Author(s):  
Madoka Takao ◽  
Yoshitaka Takegawa ◽  
Toshitatsu Takao ◽  
Hiroya Sakaguchi ◽  
Yoshiko Nakano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Fibrin Glue ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Injection ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Vitro Model ◽  
Histopathologic Findings

Abstract Background and study aims Adequate mucosal elevation by submucosal injection is crucial for patient safety and efficiency during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fibrin glue (FG) as a long-lasting submucosal injection agent and to evaluate the technical feasibility of FG injection for ESD. Materials and methods To compare the capabilities of different agents in maintaining submucosal evaluation, we injected FG, hyaluronic acid solution, and normal saline into the porcine gastric specimen that was incised into approximately 5 × 5 cm squares. Then, we measured the height of submucosal elevations over time. Moreover, three hypothetical lesions from the resected porcine stomach underwent ESD with FG injection. Thereafter, we conducted macroscopic and histopathologic analyses. Results FG maintained the greatest submucosal elevation among all the injection agents. Three ESD procedures were performed with en bloc resection. Both macroscopic and histopathologic findings showed a thick FG clot on the ulcers. Conclusions The FG solution can be potentially used as an ESD submucosal injection agent in an in vitro model.

scholarly journals Ideal submucosal injection solution for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsunobu Matsushita ◽  
Yu Takahashi ◽  
Takahiro Wakamatsu ◽  
Akiyoshi Nishio ◽  
Toshihito Seki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Injection Solution ◽  
Submucosal Injection ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Clinical benefit of the multibending endoscope for gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized controlled trial

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koichi Hamada ◽  
Yoshinori Horikawa ◽  
Yoshiki Shiwa ◽  
Kae Techigawara ◽  
Takayuki Nagahashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Complete Removal ◽  
Muscle Layer ◽  
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms ◽  
Procedure Time ◽  
Operator Experience ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technically difficult and time-consuming procedure. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ESD using a multibending endoscope to treat superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms. Methods Patients with a single early gastric cancer who met the absolute or expanded indications for ESD according to the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo ESD using a conventional endoscope (C-ESD) or a multibending endoscope (M-ESD). Randomization was stratified by ESD operator experience and tumor location. The primary outcome was ESD procedure time, calculated as the time from the start of submucosal injection to complete removal of the tumor. Results 60 patients were analyzed (30 C-ESD, 30 M-ESD). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) ESD procedure times for M-ESD and C-ESD were 34.6 (SD 17.2) and 47.2 (SD 26.7) minutes, respectively (P = 0.03). Muscle layer damage occurred significantly less frequently with M-ESD (0.2 [SD 0.7] vs. 0.7 [SD 1.0]; P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between the two techniques in procedure time or damage to muscle layers for tumors located in the lower third of the stomach. Conclusions ESD procedure time was significantly shorter with the multibending endoscope and fewer muscles were damaged. We recommend multibending endoscopy for ESD in the upper and middle thirds of the stomach to reduce procedure time and incidence of complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document