scholarly journals Impact of glycemic control on the incidence of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: a comparison of two strategies using the RIFLE criteria

Clinics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 65 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
José Raimundo Araújo de Azevedo ◽  
Renato Palácio de Azevedo ◽  
Lara Carneiro de Lucena ◽  
Nathalia de Nazaré Rabelo da Costa ◽  
Widlane Sousa da Silva
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S344-S344
Author(s):  
W Cliff Rutter ◽  
David S Burgess

Abstract Background Increased acute kidney injury (AKI) incidence is linked with coadministration of vancomycin (VAN) and piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) in the general hospital population when compared with VAN and cefepime (FEP); however, this phenomenon was not found in critically ill patients. Methods Patients receiving VAN in combination with FEP or TZP for at least 48 hours during an intensive care unit stay were included in this retrospective review. AKI was defined with the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, and End-stage (RIFLE) criteria. Exposure to common nephrotoxins was captured within 24 hours of combination therapy initiation through the entire treatment window. Basic descriptive statistics were performed, along with bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models of AKI odds. Results In total, 2230 patients were included, with 773 receiving FEP+VAN and 1457 receiving TZP+VAN. The groups were well balanced at baseline in most covariates, with the exception of hepatorenal syndrome diagnosis (TZP+VAN 1.4% vs. FEP+VAN 0.3%, P = 0.02) and vasopressor exposure (TZP+VAN 26.2% vs 21.5%, P = 0.01) being more common in the TZP+VAN group. Patients in the FEP+VAN group had a higher underlying severity of disease (Charlson comorbidity index [CCI] 2.7 vs. 2.3, P =0.0002). AKI incidence was higher in the TZP+VAN cohort (35.1% vs. 26.5%, P = 0.00004), with each stratification of the RIFLE criteria being higher. The time until onset of AKI was similar between groups (TZP+VAN median 1 [0–3] days vs. FEP+VAN 1 [0–4] days, P =0.2). After multivariable logistic regression, TZP+VAN therapy was associated with an adjust odds ratio (aOR) of AKI of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.25–1.89) compared with FEP+VAN. Other variables associated with increased odds of AKI included: age >= 65, duration of antibiotic therapy, higher baseline renal function, sepsis, endocarditis, hepatorenal syndrome, thiazide diuretic exposure, and increased CCI. Conclusion Treatment with TZP+VAN is associated with significant increases in AKI incidence among critically ill patients, independent of other risks for AKI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2021 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chettipunyam S Chetan ◽  
Suhas Challa ◽  
Manjunath S Shetty ◽  
Sudarshana Murthy K A ◽  
Kiran K Kelur ◽  
...  

Background: Detecting significant renal injury in an accurate and timely manner in acute kidney injury (AKI) patients who are critically ill remains controversial. Serum creatinine (Cr) is an important marker of kidney function in clinical practice, and its limitations are well known. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) as a marker of the early development of AKI in critically ill AKI patients. Methods: This prospective study was carried out at JSS Hospital, Mysuru, India. The diagnosis and staging of AKI was done according to the RIFLE criteria. Results: A total of 53 critically ill patients were enrolled in this study. During Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay, 34 (64.2%) patients developed AKI according to RIFLE criteria. Serum NGAL levels assessed on admission were an appropriate predictor of AKI com-pared to serum Cr. Serum NGAL levels also showed a significant elevation among AKI patients than non-AKI cases. The mean levels for AKI patients at 0, 4, and 8 hours were 870.53, 1074.9, and 1090, respectively. Meanwhile, the mean levels for non-AKI patients at 0, 4, and 8 hours were 337, 307, and 292. Conclusions: Measuring serum NGAL on admission is useful in the early diagnosis of AKI com-pared to serum Cr.


2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-25
Author(s):  
Pınar Karagöz ◽  
Arzu Kefi ◽  
Pınar Erbay Dündar ◽  
Serpil Canan ◽  
Melek Çivi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document