Treatment of Asymmetric Velopharyngeal Insufficiency with Skewed Pharyngeal Flap

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravelo V. Argamaso ◽  
Gerald J. Levandowski ◽  
Karen J. Golding-Kushner ◽  
Robert J. Shprintzen
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Tumor Resection ◽  
Velocardiofacial Syndrome ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Lateral Pharyngeal Wall ◽  
Pharyngeal Wall ◽  
Wall Movement ◽  
Hypernasal Speech

Twenty-two patients, with hypernasal speech and asymmetric velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) identified preoperatively by multi-view videofluoroscopy and nasopharyngoscopy, were managed with superiorly based pharyngeal flaps skewed to the side with reduced lateral pharyngeal wall movement. Patient age ranged from 5 to 58 years. The etiology of the VPI included cleft palate with or without cleft lip, neurogenic VPI, velocardiofacial syndrome, tumor resection or latrogenic causes, submucous cleft palate, neurofibromatosis, and hemifacial microsomia. Follow-up, at 1 year and thereafter, showed resolution of VPI in all but two patients. An auxiliary flap to augment the primary flap was added on the side of diminished lateral pharyngeal wall motion which corrected the residual VPI. Three patients developed hyponasality. One was a child whose symptoms improved with time and growth. Two were adults, but the hyponasal resonance was mild and required no further Intervention. The advantage of skewing flaps is that at least one port functions adequately for ease in respiration and for drainage of secretions, thus reducing the risk of nasal obstruction. One open port also allows access for nasoendotracheal intubation should anesthetic be required for future operations.

Is Isolated Palatal Anomaly an Indication to Screen for 22q11 Region Deletion?

2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orit Reish ◽  
Yehuda Finkelstein ◽  
Ronit Mesterman ◽  
Ariela Nachmani ◽  
Baruch Wolach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Velocardiofacial Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Facial Dysmorphism ◽  
22Q11 Deletion ◽  
22Q11 Region

Objective Velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS) is the most common multiple anomaly disorder associated with palatal clefting. Cytogenetic hemizygous deletion of 22q11 region is found in 80% of patients. The frequency of 22q11 deletion in patients presenting with isolated palatal anomalies has not been fully assessed. Our objective was to determine the frequency of the deletion in patients with isolated palatal anomalies. Design Patients were referred because of velopharyngeal insufficiency because of isolated congenital palatal anomalies. Diagnosis of palatal anomalies was confirmed by videonasopharyngoscopy, multiview videofluoroscopy and cephalometry. Other clinical findings suggestive of VCFS were sought, and subjects with these characteristics were excluded from the study. Peripheral blood samples from all patients were analyzed cytogenetically utilizing fluorescent in situ hybridization for the 22q11 region. Results Thirty-eight patients aged 3 to 31 years were included in the study. Nine had cleft palate, 7 cleft lip and palate, 10 overt and 11 occult submucous cleft palate, and 1 had a deep nasopharynx. No deletion of 22q11 region was detected in any of the evaluated patients. Conclusions A routine screening for the 22q11 deletion in older children and adults presenting with an isolated palatal anomaly may not be required. Because other signs related to VCFS such as facial dysmorphism and behavioral or psychiatric disorders may evolve at an older age, young patients should be followed up and reevaluated for additional relevant symptoms that may lead to deletion evaluation. In light of the fact that the current literature is inconsistent, the relative small size of this study and the significant consequences of missed 22q11.2 deletion, more information is needed before definitive recommendations can be made.

Cleft palate, treatment and complications

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Davari Heidar ◽  
Marzieh Jafari ◽  
Hamed Zandi Esfahani
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Severe Form ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Age At Surgery ◽  
Speech Assessment

Introduction:  The purpose of this study is to determine the incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), fistulae and recurrence development in patients seen by the Isfahan Cleft Care Clinic and also determine the association of gender, age at repair, and cleft type with the incidence of each. Methods and materials: In this retrospective study, 320 children who had undergone a primary cleft palate surgery and who had come to the Cleft lip and palate in Isfahan in 2010-2017 were studied based on the medical records and Information about each patient. Then all patients were evaluated by standard speech assessment methods for severity of hypernasalitis and screened for clinical manifestations of fistula and recurrence. Results: According to the results of this study, the incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency after initial repair was 78.1% and most of these patients had severe form. The results also showed that by increasing age at surgery also increased the intensity of velopharyngeal insufficiency, and the severity of this complication has nothing to do with gender. In the case of fistula and recurrence of cleft showed that, in patients who are undergoing the new procedure to be significantly less than other patients. Conclusion: According to the study, palatoplasty complications such as velopharyngeal insufficiency, fistula, and recurrence were less common in patients treated with microsurgery, Therefore, it can be concluded surgical repair of cleft palate should be performed before 12 months ages and in microsurgery methods. It seems that follow up of these patients after surgery for monitoring of speech complications is necessary.

Phonological Profile of Patients With Velopharyngeal Dysfunction and Palatal Anomalies

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Ariela Nachmani ◽  
Muhamed Masalha ◽  
Firas Kassem
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Phonological Process ◽  
Phonological Processes ◽  
Process Error ◽  
Submucous Cleft Palate ◽  
Different Types

Purpose This purpose of this study was to assess the frequency and types of phonological process errors in patients with velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD) and the different types of palatal anomalies. Method A total of 808 nonsyndromic patients with VPD, who underwent follow-up at the Center for Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies, from 2000 to 2016 were included. Patients were stratified into four age groups and five subphenotypes of palatal anomalies: cleft lip and palate (CLP), cleft palate (CP), submucous cleft palate (SMCP), occult submucous cleft palate (OSMCP), and non-CP. Phonological processes were compared among groups. Results The 808 patients ranged in age from 3 to 29 years, and 439 (54.3%) were male. Overall, 262/808 patients (32.4%) had phonological process errors; 80 (59.7%) ages 3–4 years, 98 (40, 0%) ages 4.1–6 years, 48 (24.7%) 6.1–9 years, and 36 (15.3%) 9.1–29 years. Devoicing was the most prevalent phonological process error, found in 97 patients (12%), followed by cluster reduction in 82 (10.1%), fronting in 66 (8.2%), stopping in 45 (5.6%), final consonant deletion in 43 (5.3%), backing in 30 (3.7%), and syllable deletion and onset deletion in 13 (1.6%) patients. No differences were found in devoicing errors between palatal anomalies, even with increasing age. Phonological processes were found in 61/138 (44.20%) with CP, 46/118 (38.1%) with SMCP, 61/188 (32.4%) with non-CP, 70/268 (26.1%) with OSMCP, and 25/96 (26.2%) with CLP. Phonological process errors were most frequent with CP and least with OSMCP ( p = .001). Conclusions Phonological process errors in nonsyndromic VPD patients remained relatively high in all age groups up to adulthood, regardless of the type of palatal anomaly. Our findings regarding the phonological skills of patients with palatal anomalies can help clarify the etiology of speech and sound disorders in VPD patients, and contribute to general phonetic and phonological studies.

Greater Palatal Cleft Width Predicts an Increased Risk for Unfavorable Outcomes in Cleft Palate Repair

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110295
Author(s):  
Åsa C. Okhiria ◽  
Fatemeh Jabbari ◽  
Malin M. Hakelius ◽  
Monica M. Blom Johansson ◽  
Daniel J. Nowinski
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Secondary Surgery ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Cleft Palate Repair ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Nasal Emission

Objective: To investigate the impact of cleft width and cleft type on the need for secondary surgery and velopharyngeal competence from a longitudinal perspective. Design: Retrospective, longitudinal study. Setting: A single multidisciplinary craniofacial team at a university hospital. Patients: Consecutive patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate and cleft palate only (n = 313) born from 1984 to 2002, treated with 2-stage palatal surgery, were reviewed. A total of 213 patients were included. Main Outcome Measures: The impact of initial cleft width and cleft type on secondary surgery. Assessment of hypernasality, audible nasal emission, and glottal articulation from routine follow-ups from 3 to 16 years of age. The assessments were compared with reassessments of 10% of the recordings. Results: Cleft width, but not cleft type, predicted the need for secondary surgery, either due to palatal dehiscence or velopharyngeal insufficiency. The distribution of cleft width between the scale steps on a 4-point scale for hypernasality and audible nasal emission differed significantly at 5 years of age but not at any other age. Presence of glottal articulation differed significantly at 3 and 5 years of age. No differences between cleft types were seen at any age for any speech variable. Conclusions: Cleft width emerged as a predictor of the need for secondary surgery as well as more deviance in speech variables related to velopharyngeal competence during the preschool years. Cleft type was not related to the need for secondary surgery nor speech outcome at any age.

Management of Speech and Swallowing Disorders in Children with Oral Clefts

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi K. Garg ◽  
Delora L Mount
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Speech Therapy ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Posterior Pharyngeal Wall ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Pharyngeal Wall ◽  
Pharyngeal Flap ◽  
Sphincter Pharyngoplasty

Cleft lip and palate are common congenital anomalies with significant implications for feeding, swallowing, and speech. If a cleft palate goes unrepaired, a child will have difficulty distinguishing nasal and oral sounds. Even following cleft palate repair, approximately 20 to 30% of nonsyndromic children have persistent hypernasal speech. This often occurs due to velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD), a term describing failure of the soft palate and pharyngeal walls to seal the nasopharynx from the oropharynx during oral consonant production. The gold standard for diagnosis is perceptual examination by a trained speech pathologist, although additional diagnostic tools such as nasendoscopy are often used. Treatment options for VPD range from speech therapy to revision palatoplasty, sphincter pharyngoplasty, pharyngeal flap, and pharyngeal wall augmentation. Palatal prosthetics may also be considered for children who are not surgical candidates. Further research is needed to improve selection of diagnostic and treatment interventions and optimize speech outcomes for children with a history of oral cleft. This review contains 1 figure, 3 videos, and 58 references.  Key words: Cleft lip and palate, hypernasal resonance, levator veli palatine, nasal emission, nasendoscopy, palatoplasty, pharyngeal flap, posterior pharyngeal wall augmentation, sphincter pharyngoplasty, velopharyngeal dysfunction

Long-Term Otologic and Audiometric Outcomes in Patients with Cleft Palate

2017 ◽  
Vol 157 (4) ◽  
pp. 676-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence E. Imbery ◽  
Lindsay B. Sobin ◽  
Emily Commesso ◽  
Lindsey Koester ◽  
Sherard A. Tatum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Closure Rate ◽  
Pressure Equalization

Objective Describe longitudinal audiometric and otologic outcomes in patients with cleft palates. Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Single academic medical center. Methods Charts of 564 patients with a diagnosis of cleft palate (59% syndromic etiology, 41% nonsyndromic) from 1998 to 2014 were reviewed. Patients without at least 1 audiometric follow-up were excluded from analysis. Patient demographics, surgeries, audiometric tests, and otologic data were recorded for 352 patients. Results Forty-five percent had isolated cleft palates, 34% had unilateral cleft lip and palate, and 21% had bilateral cleft lip and palate. Patients were followed for a mean of 50.3 months with a mean of 3.2 separate audiograms performed. Patients received a mean of 2.93 pressure equalization tubes. Increased number of pressure equalization tubes was not associated with incidence of cholesteatoma, which was identified in only 4 patients. Nine patients underwent eventual tympanoplasty with an 89% closure rate. Analysis of mean air-bone gap by cleft type did not reveal significant differences ( P = .08), but conductive losses and abnormal tympanometry persisted into teenage years. Conclusions Patients with cleft palates have eustachian tube dysfunction, which, in our cohort, resulted in persistent conductive hearing loss, highlighting the importance of long-term follow-up. Cholesteatoma incidence was low and not associated with number of tubes, which at our institution were placed prophylactically. Tympanoplasty was successful in those with persistent perforations.

Cleft Palate Rehabilitation: Interim Strategies in Indonesia

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 316-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doris Schreiber Willcox
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Frequent Feeding ◽  
Speech Therapists

The following is a discussion of the formidable obstacles to cleft palate rehabilitation in Indonesia, including frequent feeding deaths, lack of timely surgery, lack of speech therapists, and lack of follow-up opportunities. It describes the work of a remarkable group of Indonesian professionals who, along with a few interested Western associates, are searching for ways to provide treatment and care for needy patients with cleft lip and palate. It details the various strategies being attempted to overcome some of these obstacles.

Velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients without a cleft palate: important considerations for the ENT surgeon

2020 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-255
Author(s):  
E Mushi ◽  
N Mahdi ◽  
N Upile ◽  
C Hevican ◽  
S McKernon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Paediatric Population ◽  
Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ◽  
Consent Process ◽  
Aetiological Factor ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Predisposing Factor ◽  
Significant Complication ◽  
Hypernasal Speech

AbstractBackgroundVelopharyngeal insufficiency is the inability to close the velopharyngeal port during speech and swallowing, leading to hypernasal speech and food regurgitation.ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the aetiological factors contributing to the development of velopharyngeal insufficiency in a non-cleft paediatric population, especially following adenoidectomy.MethodsA retrospective case review was conducted of all children without a known cleft palate, born between 2000 and 2013, who were referred to a tertiary cleft centre with possible velopharyngeal insufficiency.ResultsThe data for 139 children diagnosed with velopharyngeal insufficiency following referral to the cleft centre were analysed. Thirteen patients developed the condition following adenoidectomy; only 3 of these 13 had a contributing aetiological factor.ConclusionVelopharyngeal insufficiency is a rare but significant complication of adenoidectomy. The majority of patients who developed velopharyngeal insufficiency following adenoidectomy did not have an identifiable predisposing factor. This has important implications for the consent process and when planning adenoidectomy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document