Wellbore Instability of Directional Wells in Laminated and Naturally Fractured Shales

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Talal M. Al-Bazali ◽  
Jianguo Zhang ◽  
Chris Wolfe ◽  
Martin E. Chenevert ◽  
Mukul M. Sharma
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bassey Akong ◽  
Samuel Orimoloye ◽  
Friday Otutu ◽  
Goodluck Mfonnom ◽  
Akinwale Ojo ◽  
...  

Abstract Drilling of deviated development wells in O-field X has proven to be challenging. Drilling experience in several wells within the field has different issues of wellbore instability, most recent is when traversed through a pre-existing/naturally fractured intervals. Numerous lost-time incidents related to wellbore instability-related problems were experienced, ranging from tight hole (remedied by reaming) to Overpulls, pack-off followed by stuck pipe, fill on-bottom to difficulties in running casing, and tensile cavings to high gas associated with drilling breaks. These problems were observed particularly when drilling previous and current wells in the O-field X. Many of the wells in O-field X were drilled with water-based mud (WBM) for top-hole and POBM for intermediate hole section. However, drilling the most recent well became more challenging with issues of severe losses just below the 13-3/8inch shoe where an interbedded lignite formation characterized with pre-existing fractures was drilled through. Faced with continual non-productive time (NPT), the predrill GeoMechanical report was immediately reviewed coupled with the stress caging procedure adopted to further mitigate the loss circulation wellbore instability problem. The recommendations arising from the comprehensive review of the GeoMechanical window, stress caging and drilling experience analyses was immediately implemented to improve performance which has helped in drilling the well to final completion. This paper highlights the importance of integrating GeoMechanics, stress caging and with proper drilling practices which has helped in delivery of the candidate well. A full-scale GeoMechanical window review was proactively adopted considering the mid-line collapse gradient approach for unconsolidated, naturally fracture formations and critical depleted intervals. All the above strategies were adopted, which assisted in safe delivery of candidate well in O-field X.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianguo Zhang ◽  
Alan Rodgerson ◽  
Stephen Edwards

Abstract Wellbore instability and lost circulation are two major sources of non-productive time (NPT) in drilling operations worldwide. Non-aqueous fluid (NAF) is often chosen to mitigate this and minimize the chemical effect on wellbore instability in reactive shales. However, it may inadvertently increase the risk of losses. A simple method to optimize internal phase salinity (IPS) of NAF is presented to improve wellbore stability and mitigate the increased possibility of losses. Field cases are used to demonstrate the effects of salinity on wellbore instability and losses, and the application of the proposed method. IPS is optimized by managing bidirectional water movement between the NAF and shale formation via semi-permeable membrane. Typically, higher shale dehydration is designed for shallow reactive shale formation with high water content. Whereas, low or no dehydration is desired for deep naturally fractured or faulted formation by balancing osmotic pressure with hydrostatic pressure difference between mud pressure and pore pressure. The simple approach to managing this is as follows: The water activity profile for the shale formation (aw,shale) is developed based on geomechanical and geothermal information The water activity of drilling fluid (aw,mud) is defined through considering IPS and thermal effects The IPS of NAF is manipulated to manage whether shale dehydration is a requirement or should be avoided If the main challenge is wellbore instability in a chemically reactive shale, then the IPS should be higher than the equivalent salinity of shale formation (or aw,shale > aw, mud) If the main challenge is losses into non-reactive, competent but naturally fractured or faulted shale, then IPS should be at near balance with the formation equivalent salinity (or aw, shale ≈ aw, mud) It is important that salt (e.g. calcium chloride – CaCl2) addition during drilling operations is done judiciously. The real time monitoring of salinity variations, CaCl2 addition, water evaporation, electric stability (ES), cuttings/cavings etc. will help determine if extra salt is required. The myth of the negative effects of IPS on wellbore instability and lost circulation is dispelled by analyzing the field data. The traditional Chinese philosophy: "following Nature is the only criteria to judge if something is right" can be applied in this instance of IPS optimization. A simple and intuitive method to manage IPS is proposed to improve drilling performance.


2004 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 303-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Luna ◽  
A. Medina ◽  
C. Perez-Rosales ◽  
C. Trevino

Author(s):  
Kelly Cristinne Leite Angelim ◽  
Túlio Cavalcante ◽  
Jonathan Teixeira ◽  
Paulo Roberto Maciel Lyra ◽  
DARLAN KARLO ELISIÁRIO DE CARVALHO

Author(s):  
Juan Diego dos Santos Heringer ◽  
Paulo de Tarço Honorio Junior ◽  
Grazione de Souza ◽  
Helio Pedro Amaral Souto

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document