FACULTY AND STUDENT VIEWS ON ENGINEERING STUDENT TEAM EFFECTIVENESS

Author(s):  
Patricia F. Mead ◽  
D. Moore ◽  
M. Natishan ◽  
L. Schmidt ◽  
Shirley Vining Brown ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Patricia Kristine Sheridan ◽  
Doug Reeve ◽  
Greg Evans

Team-based projects have become a common method of modeling real-world experience and meeting required graduate attributes in engineering. In these projects, much of a student’s grade is attributed to work produced by an entire team, creating a need for instruction on how to work effectively as team members in addition to course-content instruction. A web-based tool is in development to create a virtual environment in which students can learn about and improve their individual team-effectiveness competencies through self- and peer-assessments. Framed as a guided reflection, these assessments are facilitated using an inventory which identifies 18 competencies along three aspects of team-effectiveness: Organisational, Relational and Communication competencies [1]. The inventory assesses observable behaviours that translate to specific levels of competency so as to provide a foundation for normalized self- and peer-assessments, as well as provide examples of how to improve. A study to assess student perceptions and use of the inventory was conducted in the Fall 2012 term in two upper year courses. The first course was a third-year course on energy systems that is required of all students in the Energy Option of Engineering Science and the second a fourth-year engineering leadership course which any engineering student can select as an elective. The objective of this study was to determine if students in a required engineering course perceived and used the inventory differently than those who self-selected into an engineering leadership course.


2002 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn R. Deeter-Schmelz ◽  
Karen Norman Kennedy ◽  
Rosemary P. Ramsey

Author(s):  
Radhika R. Kartha ◽  
Dr Michael W. Fowler ◽  
Dr Roydon A. Fraser

 Abstract – Design-and-build competitions are integral to effective higher engineering education. Yet, there is not much research investigating if the organizational structures of engineering student teams and team effectiveness follow any trends. This paper delves into the possibility of this correlation by measuring parameters that contribute to effective teams. This research provides data that is used to judge best practices for engineering student teams. The findings from this paper can then be used as a basis for action when the students find a need for organization development in the future. Additionally, this analysis provides insight into teamwork in engineering. This could benefit 4th year design (a.k.a capstone) projects as well as innovative companies with similar settings. The core contributors to a team's effectiveness are leadership, direction, planning, knowledge transfer, and meetings for engineering student teams. Although parameters like communication and team culture are important, student teams generally have no problems in these areas. By comparing three organizational structures, it is concluded that in general engineering student teams are best when they follow a holocratic or flatter organizational structure as opposed to a strictly flat organizational structure.  


2002 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 114-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawn R. Deeter-Schmelz ◽  
Karen Norman Kennedy ◽  
Rosemary P. Ramsey

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document