Risk‐Reducing Strategies for Ovarian Cancer in
            BRCA
            Mutation Carriers: A Balancing Act

1547 Background: Risk reducing gynecologic surgery (RRSO) is standard of care for women with BRCA mutations. The optimal management for women with non-BRCA ovarian cancer susceptibility mutations remains unclear. We sought to characterize the practice patterns for these women at our two institutions. Methods: Women with germline ovarian cancer susceptibility genes who had a RRSO were identified from 1/2000-1/2019 in an IRB approved study. All patients were asymptomatic with no suspicion for malignancy at time of RRSO. Clinico-pathologic characteristics were extracted from the medical records. Continuous variables were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and categorical variables analyzed with chi square and t-tests. Results: 152 BRCA1, 95 BRCA2, and 63 Non-BRCA mutation carriers were identified—50 Lynch (22 MLH1, 13 MSH2, 13 MSH6, 2 PMS2) and 13 Other (6 BRIP1, 2 RAD51C, 5 RAD51D). There was no difference between age at testing, age at RRSO, and interval between testing and RRSO between groups. Genetic counseling was higher in Non-BRCA patients. Family history of ovarian cancer was more common in women with BRCA1 and Other germline mutations compared to BRCA2 and Lynch. Family and personal history of breast cancer was high in all groups except Lynch carriers. Prophylactic mastectomy was seen mostly in BRCA mutation carriers. Concomitant hysterectomy was performed in the majority of women (BRCA1 59%, BRCA2 57%, and Other 62%), with the highest frequency in Lynch carriers (86%, p<.01). Occult cancer was only seen in BRCA mutation carriers: BRCA1 (7%), BRCA2 (2%), Lynch (0%), Other (0%). Conclusions: In this cohort, women with Non-BRCA mutations are managed similarly to women with BRCA mutations. We observed no occult cancers in Non-BRCA patients. The optimal role of surgery as a risk reducing strategy in this group requires further study. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text

Pathologic findings at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy among women at increased ovarian cancer risk: Results from GOG-199.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2012.30.15_suppl.1519 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 1519-1519 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Phuong L. Mai ◽

Mark E Sherman ◽

Marion Piedmonte ◽

Olga B. Ioffe ◽

Brigitte M. Ronnett ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ovarian Cancer ◽

Family History ◽

Brca Mutation ◽

Brca2 Mutation ◽

Ovarian Cancer Risk ◽

Strong Family History ◽

Mutation Carriers ◽

Pelvic Cancer ◽

Brca Mutation Carriers ◽

Risk Reducing

1519 Background: Although risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is a standard management option for women with BRCA1/2 mutations, the lack of large, prospective cohort studies makes estimating the prevalence of cancer at RRSO problematic. Methods: GOG-199 is a large, non-randomized multi-center trial which enrolled women at high-risk (due to BRCA mutations or strong family history) of ovarian cancer, comparing surgery at enrollment with serial transvaginal ultrasound and CA-125 screening. RRSO specimens were processed according to a standardized tissue processing protocol including 2-3mm sectioning of both ovaries and tubes. Results: 2,605 participants were accrued to GOG-199. Of the 1 030 enrolled in the baseline RRSO cohort, 28 were ineligible and 36 declined surgery after enrollment, resulting in 966 baseline RRSO. Pathology review demonstrated 4 tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and 20 serous pelvic cancers, of which 12 were identified only microscopically. Among the 20 serous cancers, the predominant or exclusive site of involvement was ovary in 10, fallopian tube in 5, and peritoneum in 5 cases. In addition, 6 endometrial cancers (among the 515 undergoing concomitant hysterectomy) and 3 adenocarcinomas suggestive of metastasis were identified. The serous pelvic cancer prevalence was: entire cohort=2.1% (20/966), all BRCA mutation carriers=3.2 (18/558), BRCA1 mutation carriers=3.7% (12/325), BRCA2 mutation carriers=2.6% (6/231), and mutation-negative=0.5% (2/402). Compared to those without cancer, women with serous pelvic cancer were older at surgery (p< .001), and more often menopausal (vs pre-menopausal, p= .002), nulliparous (vs parous, p=.04) and never users of tamoxifen (vs ever users, p= .04). Serous pelvic cancers were more frequent in BRCA mutation carriers (vs no mutation, p= .004), and among carriers, more common in those with BRCA1 mutations (vs BRCA2 mutation, p= .02). Conclusions: The prevalence of serous pelvic cancers in this cohort was 3.2% among carriers vs 0.5% among the mutation-negative but with a strong family history. Our data will be useful when counseling women at increased ovarian cancer risk who are contemplating risk-reducing surgery.

Download Full-text