A Study on Unsuk Chin’s Double Concerto with the Strategy of Homogenization

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-181
Author(s):  
Mingyeong Son
Keyword(s):  
1970 ◽  
Vol 111 (1526) ◽  
pp. 395
Author(s):  
Robert Anderson ◽  
Brahms ◽  
Oistrakh ◽  
Rostropovich ◽  
Cleveland Orchestra ◽  
...  

Tempo ◽  
1979 ◽  
pp. 2-10
Author(s):  
David Schiff

In the last ten years Elliott Carter has completed as many works as he had in the previous two decades combined. The increased rate of composition—A Symphony of Three Orchestras was written in six months—has been matched by even greater formal and poetic daring. Indeed the works from the Third Quartet onward are so adventurous in conception that there is little in the way of traditional musical terminology that can be used to describe their forms, harmonies, or even, as in the case of the most recent work, Syringa, their genre. And while Carter's continued exploration of abstract discourse in the Third Quartet, Duo and Brass Quintet was to be expected, the preoccupation with the voice and poetic subjects in the next three works seemed, at first, a surprising development. Carter turned to song composition in 1975 with A Mirror on Which to Dwell, a cycle of six poems by Elizabeth Bishop dedicated to the artists who gave its first performance 24 February, 1976: Susan Davenny Wyner, soprano, and Speculum Musicae. By the end of 1976 he completed A Symphony of Three Orchestras, a purely instrumental work stemming from the various projects for a choral setting of Hart Crane's ‘The Bridge’ that Carter had planned since the 1930's. A Symphony was premièred by Pierre Boulez and the New York Philharmonic, to whom it is dedicated, on 17 February 1977. On 10 December last, the eve of Carter's 70th birthday, Syringa was given its première by Jan de Gaetani (mezzo-soprano), Thomas Paul (bass) and Speculum Musicae, conducted by Harvey Sollberger. Dedicated to Sir William and Lady Glock, this work superimposes John Ashbery's retelling of the Orpheus legend, ‘Syringa’, sung by the mezzo, upon fragments of classical Greek texts sung by the bass. It might be termed a polytextual motet, a cantata, a chamber opera, or a vocal double concerto.


Tempo ◽  
1990 ◽  
pp. 11-17
Author(s):  
Bret Johnson

Fifteen years ago, Nicolas Slonimsky wrote of Benjamin Lees in Tempo: ‘At a time when so many otherwise valiant composers are star-crossed and complain of malign neglect, Benjamin Lees rises “in excelsis” in the musical firmament’. And so he has continued since, with many commissions and numerous major works to his credit, matched by frequent performances in the United States. It is a time that has seen the creation of his Fourth and Fifth Symphonies, a set of Variations for Piano and Orchestra, a Concerto for Brass Choir and Orchestra, a Double Concerto for Piano, Cello and Orchestra, at least four other orchestral compositions of substantial scale, and the Third and Fourth String Quartets. All of these have contributed to his continuing high profile in the American musical scene. When one surveys Lees's entire corpus of music over the last four decades, one sees an impressive range of works, achievements and awards. Such pieces as the Violin Concerto (1958), Third Symphony (1969) and Concerto for String Quartet and Orchestra (1965), all commercially recorded, stand out as landmarks not only of his own music but of postwar American music generally. His style has continued to evolve in recent years and whilst his hallmark is still his adherence to form and structure, he has become more concerned with orchestral sonority and, without becoming explicitly programmatic, practises his art within an ever-widening sound spectrum and colouristic palette. He has always possessed a strongly individual personality, and the ‘Lees Sound’ is unquestionably unique, even through his exposition and development of musical ideas-and the technique of continual evolution which he favours at present-derive, at source, from his most important early musical teacher: George Antheil.


1972 ◽  
Vol 113 (1554) ◽  
pp. 779
Author(s):  
Robert Anderson ◽  
Brahms ◽  
Szeryng ◽  
Starker ◽  
Concertgebouw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

1969 ◽  
Vol 110 (1522) ◽  
pp. 1249
Author(s):  
Wilfrid Mellers ◽  
Elliott Carter ◽  
NPO ◽  
Jacobs ◽  
Rosen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-566
Author(s):  
Rachel S. Vandagriff

During the Cold War, American private foundations subsidized American modernist composers, supporting their work through commissions, underwriting recordings and concerts, and promoting their ideas in radio programs and periodicals circulated at home and abroad. From its establishment in 1952, the Fromm Music Foundation (FMF) acted as an important player in this field. Using archival material and interviews with people who worked with the founder Paul Fromm, I show how Fromm’s involvement in his foundation, and his reliance on professional advice, constituted a unique patronage model that enabled select composers to participate actively in the promotion of their music. Fromm’s relationship with Elliott Carter provides an especially complex example of a mutually beneficial and successful partnership. Fromm’s goal was to integrate contemporary music into American musical life by supporting the production and dissemination of new compositions. Fromm sought to play the role of patron, fostering close relationships with composers who received funds and acted as his artistic advisers. Fromm’s partnership, and consequent friendship with, Carter illustrates the many ways the FMF served composers. In 1955 Fromm commissioned what became Carter’s Double Concerto for piano, harpsichord, and two chamber orchestras (1961). Fromm’s subsequent help, administered through his Foundation and personal connections, enabled Carter to secure high-quality premieres of this piece and other difficult-to-perform repertoire, helped facilitate repeat performances and recordings of these compositions, and allowed Carter, together with his wife Helen, to establish a system to fund musicians who performed his music—and also reap tax benefits. Among the recipients who benefited from Fromm’s largesse were Charles Rosen, Paul Jacobs, and Jacob Lateiner. Fromm’s actions spawned a familiar fable. Carter’s career and the way he talked about it reinforced many persistent falsehoods about an artist’s relationship, or lack thereof, to potential listeners and audiences—a source of financial support for artists since the advent of public concert life. Fromm’s financial support and Carter’s ability to supplement it helped buttress the late-Romantic myth of creative autonomy. The details of this partnership—the words exchanged, the other figures involved, and its variegated benefits—harbor broad implications for the study of Cold War-era patronage networks and for our view of Carter’s career.


1977 ◽  
Vol 118 (1616) ◽  
pp. 826
Author(s):  
Robert Anderson ◽  
Delius ◽  
Menuhin ◽  
Tortelier ◽  
RPO ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document