scholarly journals Generalizability of Universal Screening Measures for Behavioral and Emotional Risk

2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Tanner ◽  
Katie Eklund ◽  
Stephen P. Kilgus ◽  
Austin H. Johnson
2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-269
Author(s):  
Shereen C. Naser ◽  
Bridget V. Dever

Universal screening for behavioral and emotional risk is an important part of implementing multi-tiered behavioral supports in schools. The current study adds to our understanding of universal screening by examining teacher and student reports of behavioral and emotional risk. Participants included 73 fourth-grade students and 4 teachers in an urban school in the Midwestern United States. Correlations between the two informants ranged from moderate to large for the overall T-score, internalizing problems, and externalizing/self-regulation problems, but were not significant for personal adjustment/adaptive skills. Furthermore, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS) Teacher Form (TF) showed concurrent and predictive validity with academic scores, whereas the BESS Student Form (SF) showed concurrent and predictive validity with measures of school climate. Results of this study indicate that teachers and students may provide unique information regarding student functioning.


Author(s):  
Katie Eklund ◽  
Stephen P. Kilgus ◽  
Lauren Meyer ◽  
Alexandra Barber

As many youths will display symptoms of social-emotional or behavioral (SEB) health concerns during their childhood or adolescence, schools are called upon to provide supports to students who have demonstrated barriers to learning. Universal screening has been identified as one strategy to enhance the accurate identification of students struggling with SEB concerns. Universal screening measures take on a variety of formats but often include some type of brief behavior rating completed by a teacher, parent, or student to assess individual student functioning. The current chapter provides an overview of universal screening for SEB concerns. Available screening measures are reviewed, along with the psychometric evidence supporting each measure (e.g., validity, reliability, diagnostic accuracy). Procedural considerations are examined, including administration frequency and duration, screening informant selection, and parental consent protocols. Finally, a procedural framework is provided that outlines how to link screening results to evidence-based interventions.


1991 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 473-478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Beiter ◽  
Gary Ingersoll ◽  
Judith Ganser ◽  
Donald P. Orr

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 628-632
Author(s):  
Bridget V. Dever ◽  
Emily K. Gallagher ◽  
Craig D. Hochbein ◽  
Austin Loukas ◽  
Chenchen Dai

Behavioral and emotional problems among children and adolescents can lead to numerous negative outcomes without intervention. From a prevention standpoint, screening for behavioral and emotional risk is an important step toward identifying such problems before the point of diagnosis or referral. The present study conducted a k-means cluster analysis to determine the subtypes of risk captured by one such screening instrument, the Behavioral and Emotional Screening System (BESS). The final solution produced four clusters: Well-Adapted, Internalizing/Adjustment Problems, Mild Externalizing Problems, and General Problems-Severe; these results were similar to those found with the full Behavioral Assessment System for Children, Second Edition (BASC-2), suggesting that the BESS assesses similar constructs. Predictive validity evidence suggested that cluster membership was associated with standard achievement scores and in-school disciplinary incidents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document