Posttest Probabilities: An Empirical Demonstration of Their Use in Evaluating the Performance of Universal Screening Measures Across Settings

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 349-362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethan R. Van Norman ◽  
David A. Klingbeil ◽  
Peter M. Nelson
Author(s):  
Katie Eklund ◽  
Stephen P. Kilgus ◽  
Lauren Meyer ◽  
Alexandra Barber

As many youths will display symptoms of social-emotional or behavioral (SEB) health concerns during their childhood or adolescence, schools are called upon to provide supports to students who have demonstrated barriers to learning. Universal screening has been identified as one strategy to enhance the accurate identification of students struggling with SEB concerns. Universal screening measures take on a variety of formats but often include some type of brief behavior rating completed by a teacher, parent, or student to assess individual student functioning. The current chapter provides an overview of universal screening for SEB concerns. Available screening measures are reviewed, along with the psychometric evidence supporting each measure (e.g., validity, reliability, diagnostic accuracy). Procedural considerations are examined, including administration frequency and duration, screening informant selection, and parental consent protocols. Finally, a procedural framework is provided that outlines how to link screening results to evidence-based interventions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Tanner ◽  
Katie Eklund ◽  
Stephen P. Kilgus ◽  
Austin H. Johnson

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 108-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey Hartman ◽  
Frank M. Gresham ◽  
Shelby Byrd

Universal screening for emotional and behavioral risk in schools facilitates early identification and intervention for students as part of multitiered systems of support. Early identification has the potential to mitigate adverse outcomes of emotional and behavioral disorders. The purpose of this study was to extend existing research on the technical adequacy and usability of two universal screening measures, the Student Internalizing Behavior Screener (SIBS) and the Student Externalizing Behavior Screener (SEBS). Findings provided evidence for the reliability, concurrent validity, short-term predictive validity, and usability of the SIBS and SEBS in a sample of 154 elementary school students and their teachers. As a secondary focus, the technical adequacy and usability of the SIBS and SEBS was compared with that of two well-researched universal behavioral screening measures ( Behavioral and Emotional Screening System and Social Skills Improvement System–Performance Screening Guide). Results indicated that the SIBS and SEBS as a combined measure performed similar to the criterion screening measures.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document