scholarly journals What’s new for the clinician? - Excerpts from and summaries of recently published papers

2021 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 284-287
Author(s):  
Veerasamy Yengopal
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Kinesio Tape ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Dexketoprofen Trometamol ◽  
Inflammatory Drugs ◽  
Sports Sciences ◽  
Elastic Bandage ◽  
Postoperative Swelling

Extraction of third molars is one of the most common procedures performed by oral surgeons. Generally, these surgeries do not encounter difficulties but at times can result in complications. Postoperative complications may include swelling, pain, trismus, prolonged bleeding, dry socket, infection and sensory alterations of the inferior alveolar nerve or lingual nerve. For the swelling, the most common therapies include corticosteroids, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or a combination of these agents. Elastic bandage application (Kinesio taping) is a technique that originates from sports sciences. Studies have reported its beneficial effects on swelling and trismus symptoms after oral and maxillofacial surgeries.1It has been claimed that elastic tapes reduce postoperative swelling by creating space between the dermis and fascia layers and thus increasing lymphatic and blood flow.1 Their alleviating effect on postoperative pain is due to dermal stimulation.1 Erdil and colleagues (2021)1 reported on a trail that sought to compare the effectiveness of submucosal dexamethasone injection, a therapeutic elastic bandage (Kinesio tape), and an NSAID (dexketoprofen trometamol) on postoperative swelling, trismus, pain following third molar surgery and alterations in the quality of life in the first postoperative week.

scholarly journals 4% lidocaine versus 4% articaine for inferior alveolar nerve block in impacted lower third molar surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiatanant Boonsiriseth ◽  
Sittipong Chaimanakarn ◽  
Prued Chewpreecha ◽  
Natee Nonpassopon ◽  
Manop Khanijou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

scholarly journals Hard Tissue Preservation in Minimally Invasive Mandibular Third Molar Surgery Using In Situ Hardening TCP Bone Filler

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Wilfried Engelke ◽  
Marcio Lazzarini ◽  
Víctor Beltrán
Keyword(s):  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Hard Tissue ◽  
Socket Preservation ◽  
Bone Filler ◽  
Close Relationship ◽  
Bone Height

Background. Maintenance of hard tissue in the case of impacted third molars (M3M) with close relationship to the mandibular canal is still a surgical challenge which may be overcome using the inward fragmentation technique. Methods. A consecutive case series of 12 patients required the extraction of 13 impacted M3M with a close relationship to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Via occlusal miniflaps, M3M were exposed occlusal under endoscopic vision and removed by inward fragmentation. All patients received socket preservation with resorbable in situ hardening TCP particles to reduce the risk of pocket formation at the second molar. Results. All 13 sites healed uneventfully. Bone height was assessed using CBCT cross-sectional reformats pre- and 3 months postoperatively. The bone height was reduced by 1.54 mm lingual (SD 0.88), 2.91 mm central (SD 0.93), and 2.08 mm buccal (SD 1.09). Differences were significant at a 0.05% level. No tissue invagination at the extraction sites was observed. Conclusions. Major bone defects can be avoided safely using inward fragmentation surgery. The self-hardening bone filler appears to enhance the mineralization of the intrabony defect.

scholarly journals Panoramic versus CBCT used to reduce inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia after third molar extractions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 20190265
Author(s):  
Nathalia Calzavara Del Lhano ◽  
Rosangela Almeida Ribeiro ◽  
Carolina Castro Martins ◽  
Neuza Maria Souza Picorelli Assis ◽  
Karina Lopes Devito
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Panoramic Radiography ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Reference List ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Eligibility Criteria

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to verify whether CBCT in comparison with panoramic radiography reduced the cases of temporary paresthesias of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) associated with third molar extractions. Methods: The literature search included five databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, SciELO), in addition to gray literature and hand search of reference list of included studies. Two reviewers independently screened titles/abstracts, and full texts according to eligibility criteria, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias through Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2.0). Data were meta-analyzed by comparing CBCT versus panoramic radiographs for number of events (temporary paresthesia after third molar surgery). Fixed effect model was used for non-significant heterogeneity; relative risk (RR) and 95% CI were calculated. The certainty of evidence was evaluated by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in meta-analysis, and for the majority of domains they presented low risk of bias. RR was 1.23 (95% IC: 0.75–2.02; I2: 0%; p = 0.43) favouring panoramic radiography, but without significant effect, and with moderate certainty of evidence. Conclusions: We concluded that both interventions had a similar ability to reduce temporary paresthesia of the IAN after third molar surgery with moderate certainty of evidence.

scholarly journals Comparison of Articaine and Lidocaine for Buccal Infiltration After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block For Intraoperative Pain Control During Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

2017 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
pp. 80-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geraldo Prisco da Silva-Junior ◽  
Liane Maciel de Almeida Souza ◽  
Francisco Carlos Groppo
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Block ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar ◽  
Intraoperative Pain ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Mandibular Third Molar Surgery ◽  
Buccal Infiltration

In order to compare the efficacy of lidocaine and articaine for pain control during third molar surgery, 160 patients presenting bilateral asymptomatic impacted mandibular third molars were selected. They received 1.8 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 during inferior alveolar nerve block. In group 1 (n = 80), an infiltrative injection of 0.9 mL of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 was performed in buccal-distal mucosa of the third molar. Group 2 (n = 80) received 0.9 mL of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 in the contralateral side. All procedures were performed at the same visit, by a single operator, in a double-blind and parallel design. The duration of each surgery and the moment when the patient expressed pain were noted. Data were analyzed by nonpaired t test and chi-square test (alpha = 5%). Duration of surgery did not differ (p = .83) between Groups 1 (19.8 ± 2.3 minutes) and 2 (19.7 ± 3.0 minutes). Pain was expressed more in group 1 (26.3%) than in group 2 (10%) (odds ratio = 3.2, p = .0138). In both groups, tooth sectioning was the most painful event (p < .0001). No influence of gender (p = .85) or age (p = .96) was observed in pain response. Buccal infiltration of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 showed more efficacy than 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 when used in combination with inferior alveolar nerve block in controlling intraoperative pain related to impacted mandibular third molar surgery.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document