scholarly journals Effect of phosphoric fertilizers as a source of sulphur on malt barley total and technological grain yields

2008 ◽  
Vol 53 (No. 9) ◽  
pp. 395-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Potarzycki ◽  
W. Grzebisz

Malt barley production requires a technology increasing nitrogen use efficiency, because of a high sensitivity of barley total grain yield and quality parameters to external growth factors. In the conducted study an effect of two P fertilizers on the background of N application on total and technological grain yields were studied. The highest total grain yield was harvested on plots fertilized with 60 kg N/ha, irrespective of the P fertilizer type. However, the technological grain yield showed a high year-to-year variability; the highest was recorded in 2001 on the plot fertilized with 60 kg N/ha and the P-PAPR fertilizer. The N and S concentrations and N:S ratios in immature grains at harvest were used to evaluate both yield types. Nitrogen concentration in the final total yield allowed making yields prognosis with the highest probability. The maximum yields of technological malt barley were attainable provided that total S concentration in immature grains at harvest was above 0.23% and the N:S ratio was narrower than 8.0.

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (4) ◽  
pp. 362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria J. Poblaciones ◽  
Oscar Santamaría ◽  
Teodoro García-White ◽  
Sara M. Rodrigo

The diet of millions of people around the world is deficient in selenium (Se). Bread-making wheat has been successfully used in Se biofortification programs under temperate climate to remedy Se deficiency. However, its suitability under Mediterranean conditions and its effect on the grain yield and quality parameters are not well known. In a wheat field in south-western Spain, two foliar Se fertilisers (sodium selenate and sodium selenite) were applied at four application rates (0, 10, 20, 40 g ha–1) in 2010–11 and 2011–12. Results showed a strong and linear relationship between total Se in grain and Se dose for both fertilisers, although selenate was much more efficient. A dose of 10 g sodium selenate ha–1 was able to increase significantly the Se in grain to close to the recommended values, although Se loss of 28% during the milling process might be expected. Grain yield was not negatively affected by fertilisation, but grain protein and dry gluten were slightly negatively affected, but only in the dry year. Alveograph parameters were either not affected or slightly favoured by Se fertilisation in any studied year. Bread-making wheat is a good candidate to be included in biofortification programs under semi-arid Mediterranean conditions.


1994 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Conry

SUMMARYNine experiments were conducted in the south-east of Ireland on three contrasting soils over a 3-year period (1988–90) to test the effect of six cultivars at four rates of nitrogen on the grain yield and quality (ex-farm) of spring-sown malting barley.Blenheim gave the greatest grain yield and lowest protein on average. Blenheim and Prisma had similar low protein values but Prisma gave significantly lower (P <0·05) mean grain yields than Blenheim at all three sites. Corniche gave significantly lower (P <0·05 to 0·01) grain yields than Blenheim in all nine experiments. Choice of cultivar had a considerable effect (<16%) on the yield and protein content of malting barley but season and soil type had a much larger effect (2–3 times greater).The application of increasing increments of fertilizer nitrogen generally increased grain protein and screenings significantly (P <0·05 to 0·01) in all nine experiments but it did not always give increased grain yields. The levels at which nitrogen gave significant grain yield increases depended on season and soil type. Season and soil type had a much larger effect on grain yield and quality than nitrogen rate.It was not possible to relate grain yield to specific climatic factors except on the light textured soil in 1990 when severe moisture stress in the early part of the growing season reduced grain yield by 32·5% compared with the previous 2-year average.


Crop Science ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary J. Guttieri ◽  
Jeffrey C. Stark ◽  
Katherine O'Brien ◽  
Edward Souza

Author(s):  
Baudh Bharti ◽  
R.B. Dubey ◽  
Arun Kumar ◽  
Amit Dadheech ◽  
Rohit Kumar Dhobi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document