scholarly journals Karyotype analysis of Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet using fluorochrome banding and fluorescence in situ hybridisation with rDNA probes

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (No. 3) ◽  
pp. 110-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch.-W. She ◽  
X.-H. Jiang
2008 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Roberto Maximiano da Silva ◽  
Maria Socorro González-Elizondo ◽  
Letícia do Nascimento Andrade de Almeida Rego ◽  
José Marcelo Domingues Torezan ◽  
André Luís Laforga Vanzela

Karyotype analysis of 21 samples of 11 species of Eleocharis (Cyperaceae) from 10 localities in Brazil, showed the presence of chromosomes without primary constrictions and parallel movement of chromatids at metaphase–anaphase transition. Only the terminal nucleolar constrictions (satellites) were visualised. The chromosome numbers varied from 2n = 6 in E. subarticulata to 2n = 54 in E. acutangula, but the chromosome basic number x = 5 was confirmed. Generally, C-CMA3+ bands appear mostly in the extremities of the chromosomes, associated to NOR, and interstitial C-CMA3 bands were found only in E. geniculata and E. acutangula. C-DAPI+ bands were not found. Fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with the 45S rDNA probe was performed in five species. The results showed from four to eight hybridisation signals, always terminal. The analysed species include representatives of the following three subgenera of Eleocharis that occur in Brazil: Limnochloa, Scirpidium and Eleocharis. Species from the subgenus Limnochloa have small and numerous chromosomes. The remaining species, belonging to subgenera Eleocharis and Scirpidium, possess fewer and larger chromosomes. In subgenus Eleocharis, karyotypes of the section Eleocharis were differentiated by symploidy, agmatoploidy and polyploidy, whereas species of the section Eleogenus were all polyploids. Polyploidy seems to be the most frequent event in the karyotype differentiation in Eleocharis, but changes in the chromosome size and repetitive DNA sites were also observed.


Genome ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 911-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki-Byung Lim ◽  
Jannie Wennekes ◽  
J. Hans de Jong ◽  
Evert Jacobsen ◽  
Jaap M. van Tuyl

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 250
Author(s):  
Rebecca E O’Connor ◽  
Lucas G Kiazim ◽  
Claudia C Rathje ◽  
Rebecca L Jennings ◽  
Darren K Griffin

With demand rising, pigs are the world’s leading source of meat protein; however significant economic loss and environmental damage can be incurred if boars used for artificial insemination (AI) are hypoprolific (sub-fertile). Growing evidence suggests that semen analysis is an unreliable tool for diagnosing hypoprolificacy, with litter size and farrowing rate being more applicable. Once such data are available, however, any affected boar will have been in service for some time, with significant financial and environmental losses incurred. Reciprocal translocations (RTs) are the leading cause of porcine hypoprolificacy, reportedly present in 0.47% of AI boars. Traditional standard karyotyping, however, relies on animal specific expertise and does not detect more subtle (cryptic) translocations. Previously, we reported development of a multiple hybridisation fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) strategy; here, we report on its use in 1641 AI boars. A total of 15 different RTs were identified in 69 boars, with four further animals XX/XY chimeric. Therefore, 4.5% had a chromosome abnormality (4.2% with an RT), a 0.88% incidence. Revisiting cases with both karyotype and FISH information, we reanalysed captured images, asking whether the translocation was detectable by karyotyping alone. The results suggest that chromosome translocations in boars may be significantly under-reported, thereby highlighting the need for pre-emptive screening by this method before a boar enters a breeding programme.


The Lancet ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 353 (9148) ◽  
pp. 211-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce K Patterson ◽  
Mary Ann Czerniewski ◽  
John Pottage ◽  
Michelle Agnoli ◽  
Harold Kessler ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 62 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 181-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.J. Eyre ◽  
P.A. Akkari ◽  
C. Meredith ◽  
S.D. Wilton ◽  
D.C. Callen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document