On the Possible Autonomy of Science from Politics

Author(s):  
Lada V. Shipovalova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
2009 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Streckeisen

AbstractScholars of social science have increasingly been describing advanced capitalist societies as knowledge societies, based on a series of key assumptions about ‘post-industrialism’. My contribution challenges this new ‘conventional wisdom’ (John K. Galbraith) on several points. I first argue that it veils the ‘dark sides’ of capitalism, i.e. worker alienation, class relationships and class struggle. I then show how knowledge society experts all too often contribute to the individualization of social problems. Further on, I challenge the assumption according to which contemporary human resources management creates a new kind of work relationship based on mutual respect, objectivity and justice. Finally, I try to understand the very success of the new ‘conventional wisdom’. The relative autonomy of science and education might be the most important reason why so many social science scholars as well as ordinary people today believe they are living in a knowledge society.


Social Forces ◽  
1961 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Hirsch
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 57-82
Author(s):  
Slobodan Negic

The text that has been presented here offers a model of analysis based on the comparison of cumulative and relativistic approach in contemporary methodology and philosophy of science. The analysis is related to some of the most important problems of these disciplines, such as possibility of defining the falsification criteria for scientific theories or growth of scientific knowledge. Therefore, we have Popper (and later Lakatos) on one side, versus Kuhn on the other side. The analysis is conducted in a form of internal critique of uniformistic notion of scientific progress, in compliance with all the normative and formal requests of such argumentation. The emphases has been put on the development of conventionalism in modern science, which led to it's acceptance as a legitimate point of view in contemporary methodology. This happened due to the fact that the criteria for refuting scientific theories where constantly lowered when confronted with logical arguments derived from the very own structure of development of contemporary science. The main thesis of this work explains how aforementioned development of conventionalism implicates certain devastating consequences for methodology itself. Conventionalism encompasses by definition the external (social) factor of influence in every further development of methodology, seriously damaging the autonomy of science and scientific knowledge as well.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document