Effect of antioxidants agents on Dentinal Tubular Penetration of EndoREZ sealer on sodium hypochlorite-treated root canal dentin: A Scanning electron microscopic study v1

Author(s):  
Sudhir Varma

According to ISO, the canals were enlarged to a size 30, 6% taper with ProTaper gold (Dentsply Sirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) by crown down technique (Singh et al., 2015).Irrigation was performed with Saline and 17% EDTA in Group I. After biomechanical preparation, groups II, III, IV, and V were irrigated with 5 mL-Sodium hypochlorite (5.25%) and 5 mL-EDTA (17%) for 1 minute. Irrigation was done on Groups III, IV, and V for an additional 10 minutes with 10% Ellagic acid, 5% Lycopene extract, and 5% Grape Seed Extract, respectively. After irrigation, the root canals were dried. The EndoREZ (Ultradent Products, Inc., South Jordan, Utah, USA) was used in the canals using a 25-size spreader (Mani Inc., Tochigi, Japan), followed by warm vertical condensation. Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis: The specimens were longitudinally sectioned. Then samples were immersed in 17% EDTA solution for 10 minutes, immersed in 5.25 percent sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes, and lastly washed entirely with water to remove and smear the layer. Carbon sputtering was performed in the middle and apical thirds of the root canal to aid SEM (500x magnification) evaluation.

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaves Medici Mônika ◽  
Izabel Cristina Fröner

The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of endodontic irrigants in removing the smear layer from instrumented root canal walls using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). The endodontic irrigants used were: 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl); 1% NaOCl mixed to 17% EDTAC; 2% chlorhexidine gel; and Ricinus communis gel. Photomicrographs of the middle and apical thirds were evaluated with the aid of the Fotoscore - v. 2.0 software. The results indicated that the mixture of sodium hypochlorite and EDTAC completely removed the smear layer from dentinal walls. The other endodontic irrigants were not as efficient in cleansing the root canals.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramón Miguéns-Vila ◽  
Pablo Castelo-Baz ◽  
Saleta Aboy-Pazos ◽  
David Uroz-Torres ◽  
Pablo Álvarez-Nóvoa ◽  
...  

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of smear layer removal after the use of different irrigation methods (passive ultrasonic irrigation [PUI], continuous ultrasonic irrigation [CUI], apical negative pressure irrigation and conventional irrigation) using the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as an analytical tool. A total of 100 single-canal teeth were decoronated and randomly divided into five groups (n = 20) according to the irrigation method used: conventional irrigation with front outlet syringe, conventional irrigation with lateral outlet syringe, apical negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac), PUI with Irrisafe, and CUI with ProUltra PiezoFlow ultrasonic irrigation needle. Root canal preparation was performed with the ProTaper Gold system up to the F4 instrument and 5.25% NaOCl was used as an irrigant. After chemical-mechanical preparation, the roots were split longitudinally, and the coronal, middle and apical thirds examined. SEM digital photomicrographs were taken at ×1000 magnification to evaluate the amount of smear layer in each root canal third. CUI was more effective in removing the smear layer than the other irrigation protocols. However, none of the irrigation protocols were able to produce root canals completely free from smear layer.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samira Esteves Afonso Camargo ◽  
Marcia Carneiro Valera ◽  
Carlos Henrique Ribeiro Camargo ◽  
Manuela Bafini Fonseca ◽  
Marcia Maciel Menezes

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document