scholarly journals Augmentation of Pedicle Screws Using Bone Grafting in Patients with Spinal Osteoporosis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
A.E. Bokov ◽  
A.A. Bulkin ◽  
I.S. Bratsev ◽  
S.Ya. Kalinina ◽  
S.G. Mlyavykh ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghui Zhao ◽  
Jianxiao Li ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Xing Du ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Many types of bone grafting have been reported for successful use in the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis. However, none-structural bone grafting has rarely been studied. This study was aimed to identify the clinical efficacy of nonstructural with structural bone graft for interbody fusion in the surgical treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis after one stage posterior debridement.Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with nonstructural (n=27) and structural (n=22) bone grafting after single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation for lumbar tuberculosis with at least 24 months of follow-up. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scans, and health-related outcomes (e.g., Visual Analog Scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index) were collected and analyzed before and after surgery. Results Both nonstructural and structural bone grafting were associated with significant improvements in the life quality parameters, the laboratory tests, and the Cobb angle of local kyphosis. A slight loss of Cobb angle correction was observed in two groups. Nonstructural bone grafting exhibited the advantages of less operation duration, blood loss and lower bone fusion rate compared with structural bone grafting. There were three complications in the nonstructural bone grafting and four complications in the structural bone grafting group, with no significant difference between two groups.Conclusions In conclusion, nonstructural bone grafting can achieve comparable interbody fusion to structural bone grafting but has less surgical trauma and simpler surgical procedure than structural bone grafting in the treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis after one stage posterior debridement and pedicle screws fixation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 344-353
Author(s):  
Matthew Alexander Lea ◽  
Mahmoud Elmalky ◽  
Silviu Sabou ◽  
Irfan Siddique ◽  
Rajat Verma ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mimis Cohen ◽  
John W. Polley ◽  
Alvaro A. Figueroa

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1234-1238
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Nakasa ◽  
Yasunari Ikuta ◽  
Yuki Ota ◽  
Munekazu Kanemitsu ◽  
Junichi Sumii ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Chiung Chyi Shen

Use of pedicle screws is widespread in spinal surgery for degenerative, traumatic, and oncological diseases. The conventional technique is based on the recognition of anatomic landmarks, preparation and palpation of cortices of the pedicle under control of an intraoperative C-arm (iC-arm) fluoroscopy. With these conventional methods, the median pedicle screw accuracy ranges from 86.7% to 93.8%, even if perforation rates range from 21.1% to 39.8%.The development of novel intraoperative navigational techniques, commonly referred to as image-guided surgery (IGS), provide simultaneous and multiplanar views of spinal anatomy. IGS technology can increase the accuracy of spinal instrumentation procedures and improve patient safety. These systems, such as fluoroscopy-based image guidance ("virtual fluoroscopy") and computed tomography (CT)-based computer-guidance systems, have sensibly minimized risk of pedicle screw misplacement, with overall perforation rates ranging from between 14.3% and 9.3%, respectively."Virtual fluoroscopy" allows simultaneous two-dimensional (2D) guidance in multiple planes, but does not provide any axial images; quality of images is directly dependent on the resolution of the acquired fluoroscopic projections. Furthermore, computer-assisted surgical navigation systems decrease the reliance on intraoperative imaging, thus reducing the use of intraprocedure ionizing radiation. The major limitation of this technique is related to the variation of the position of the patient from the preoperative CT scan, usually obtained before surgery in a supine position, and the operative position (prone). The next technological evolution is the use of an intraoperative CT (iCT) scan, which would allow us to solve the position-dependent changes, granting a higher accuracy in the navigation system. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document