scholarly journals Nonstructural Versus Structural Bone Grafting for Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculosis by a Single Posterior Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghui Zhao ◽  
Jianxiao Li ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Xing Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background Many types of bone grafting have been reported for successful use in the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis. However, none-structural bone grafting has rarely been studied. This study was aimed to identify the clinical efficacy of nonstructural with structural bone graft for interbody fusion in the surgical treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis after one stage posterior debridement.Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with nonstructural (n=27) and structural (n=22) bone grafting after single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation for lumbar tuberculosis with at least 24 months of follow-up. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scans, and health-related outcomes (e.g., Visual Analog Scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index) were collected and analyzed before and after surgery. Results Both nonstructural and structural bone grafting were associated with significant improvements in the life quality parameters, the laboratory tests, and the Cobb angle of local kyphosis. A slight loss of Cobb angle correction was observed in two groups. Nonstructural bone grafting exhibited the advantages of less operation duration, blood loss and lower bone fusion rate compared with structural bone grafting. There were three complications in the nonstructural bone grafting and four complications in the structural bone grafting group, with no significant difference between two groups.Conclusions In conclusion, nonstructural bone grafting can achieve comparable interbody fusion to structural bone grafting but has less surgical trauma and simpler surgical procedure than structural bone grafting in the treatment of single segment lumbar tuberculosis after one stage posterior debridement and pedicle screws fixation.

scholarly journals One-stage posterior debridement, titanium mesh cage bone grafting and single-segment fixation for treating mono-segmental lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis in adult patients following minimum 5-year follow-up

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenchao Xu ◽  
Xiyang Wang ◽  
Zheng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Titanium Mesh ◽  
Titanium Mesh Cage ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Mesh Cage ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background To evaluate the mid-long term outcomes of surgical management of mono-segmental lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis (TB) by one-stage posterior debridement, titanium mesh cage bone grafting and single-segment fixation. Methods A total of 62 patients with mono-segmental lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis were enrolled. One-stage posterior debridement, titanium mesh cage bone grafting and single-segment fixation was performed. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared and analyzed. Results All patients were followed up for an average of 75.0 ± 11.5 months and completely cured at the final follow-up. C-reactive protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) returned to normal within three months postoperatively. Postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability index (ODI) were significantly improved compared with preoperative values. Bony fusion occurred after an average of 9.8 ± 2.6 months. The lordosis angle and lumbosacral angle were increased from preoperative 20.4 ± 2.9° and 14.7 ± 3.4°to postoperative 32.8 ± 3.6° and 22.4 ± 5.5°, with the angle loss of 1.0 ± 0.7° and 0.8 ± 0.7° at the final follow-up, respectively. No significant differences between preoperative and postoperative adjacent segment disc height (DH) were found. Conclusions one-stage posterior debridement, titanium mesh cage bone grafting and single-segment fixation can be an effective and feasible treatment option for mono-segmental lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis in adults. It may preserve lumbar normal motor units and decrease adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) with the advantages of minimally invasion and rapid postoperative rehabilitation.

scholarly journals Nonstructural versus structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghui Zhao ◽  
Jianxiao Li ◽  
Qiqi Peng ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Fusion Rate ◽  
Anterior Column ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Bone Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Column Support ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract [Background] Various bone grafting have been reported to achieve anterior column support and bone fusion after one stage posterior debridement in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis. However, nonstructural bone grafting has been rarely studied. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nonstructural bone grafting versus structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis.[Patients and methods] We retrospectively reviewed patients with nonstructural (n=27) and structural (n=22) bone grafting after single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation for lumbar tuberculosis with at least 24 months of follow-up. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scans, and health-related outcomes (e.g. Visual Analog Scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index) were collected before surgery and at follow-up. [Results] Both nonstructural and structural bone grafting were associated with significant improvements in the quality of life parameters, the laboratory tests and the Cobb angle of local kyphosis. A slight loss of Cobb angle correction was observed in two groups. Nonstructural bone grafting resulted in the significantly less operation duration, blood loss and lower bone fusion rate than structural bone grafting group. There were three complications in the nonstructural bone grafting and four complications in the structural bone grafting group, with no significant difference between two groups.[Conclusions] Nonstructural bone grafting can achieve anterior column support with less surgical trauma and simpler surgical procedure than structural bone grafting, but the lower rate of grafted bone fusion should be taken into consideration when choosing nonstructural bone grafting.

scholarly journals One-stage posterior debridement and single-segment interbody fusion for treating mono-segmental lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis in adults following minimum 5-year follow-up

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenchao Xu ◽  
Xiyang Wang ◽  
Zheng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Interbody Fusion ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Adjacent Segment ◽  
Titanium Mesh ◽  
Titanium Mesh Cage ◽  
Single Segment ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Mesh Cage ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background To evaluate the mid-long-term outcomes of surgical management of mono-segmental lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis (TB) in adults by one-stage posterior debridement, single-segment fixation, and titanium mesh cage interbody fusion. Methods A total of 62 patients with mono-segmental lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis were enrolled. One-stage posterior debridement, single-segment fixation, and titanium mesh cage interbody fusion was performed. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared and analyzed. Results All patients were followed-up for an average of 75.0 ± 11.5 months and completely cured at the final follow-up. C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) returned to normal within three months postoperatively. Postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability index (ODI) were significantly improved compared with preoperative values. Bony fusion occurred after an average of 9.8 ± 2.6 months. The lordosis angle and lumbosacral angle were increased from preoperative 20.4 ± 2.9° and 14.7 ± 3.4° to postoperative 32.8 ± 3.6° and 22.4 ± 5.5°, with angle loss of 1.0 ± 0.7° and 0.8 ± 0.7° at the final follow-up, respectively. No significant differences between preoperative and postoperative adjacent segment disc height (DH) were found. Conclusions One-stage posterior debridement, single-segment fixation, and titanium mesh cage interbody fusion represent effective and feasible treatment option for mono-segmental lumbar and lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis in adults. This approach may preserve lumbar normal motor units and decrease adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) with the advantages of minimal invasiveness and rapid postoperative rehabilitation.

scholarly journals Nonstructural versus structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghui Zhao ◽  
Jianxiao Li ◽  
Qiqi Peng ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Anterior Column ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Bone Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Anterior Column Support ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background Various bone grafting have been reported to achieve anterior column support and bone fusion after one stage posterior debridement in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis. However, nonstructural bone grafting has been rarely studied. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nonstructural bone grafting versus structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar tuberculosis.Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with nonstructural (n=27) and structural (n=22) bone grafting after single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation for lumbar tuberculosis with at least 24 months of follow-up. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography scans, and health-related outcomes (e.g. Visual Analog Scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index) were collected before surgery and at follow-up.Results Both nonstructural and structural bone grafting were associated with significant improvements in the quality of life parameters, the laboratory tests and the Cobb angle of local kyphosis. A slight loss of Cobb angle correction was observed in two groups. Nonstructural bone grafting resulted in the significantly less operation duration, blood loss and lower bone fusion rate than structural bone grafting group. There were three complications in the nonstructural bone grafting and four complications in the structural bone grafting group, with no significant difference between two groups. Conclusions Nonstructural bone grafting can achieve anterior column support with less surgical trauma and simpler surgical procedure than structural bone grafting, but the lower rate of grafted bone fusion should be taken into consideration when choosing nonstructural bone grafting. Key words Lumbar tuberculous; Single-stage posterior debridement; Anterior column support; Bone fusion; Nonstructural bone grafting; Structural bone grafting

scholarly journals Efficacy Analysis of One-stage Posterior-only Surgical Treatment for Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis in the T4-6 Segments with Minimum 5-year Follow-up

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi Zhan ◽  
Xin Kang ◽  
Wenjie Gao ◽  
Xinliang Zhang ◽  
Lingbo Kong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Surgical Trauma ◽  
Posterior Surgery ◽  
One Stage ◽  
Thoracic Spinal ◽  
Thoracic Spinal Tuberculosis

Abstract In recent years, with the in-depth research on spinal tuberculosis, posterior surgery alone has been praised highly by more and more surgeons due to the better correction of kyphosis, better maintenance of spinal physiological curvature, smaller surgical trauma and fewer surgical complications. However, there is currently lack of relevant reports about the efficacy of posterior surgery alone in the treatment of tuberculosis in the T4-6 segments. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical study efficacy and feasibility of one-stage posterior-only surgical treatment for thoracic spinal tuberculosis in the T4-6 segments. 67 patients with tuberculosis in T4-6 segments who underwent one-stage posterior-only surgery were included in this study. The clinical efficacy was evaluated using statistical analysis based on the data about erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), Oswestry Dability Index (ODI) score, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score and Cobb angle before surgery, after surgery and at the last follow-up. All patients completed fusion during the follow-up period of 6–9 months. ESR and CRP were returned to normal for all patients at 6 months follow-up. In the meanwhile, among the 27 patients combined with neurological impairment, neurological functions of 22 cases (81.48%) recovered completely at the last follow-up (P < 0.05). Cobb angle of the kyphosis was improved from preoperative 34.8 ± 10.9° to postoperative 9.6 ± 2.8°, maintaining at 11.3 ± 3.2° at the last follow-up, The ODI and VAS scores were improved by 77.10% and 81.70%, respectively. This 5-year follow-up study shows that better clinical efficacy can be achieved for tuberculosis in T4-6 segments using one-stage posterior-only approach by costotransverse debridement in combination with bone graft and internal fixation. The posterior surgical method cannot only effectively accomplish debridement, obtain satisfactory clinical results, but also well correct kyphotic deformity and maintain it.

Nonstructural versus structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis combined with single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation: a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zenghui Zhao ◽  
Jianxiao Li ◽  
Qiqi Peng ◽  
Yong Zhu ◽  
Wei Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cobb Angle ◽  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Anterior Column ◽  
Bone Fusion ◽  
Anterior Column Support ◽  
Lumbar Spinal ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background Many types of bone grafting have been reported for successful use in achieving anterior column support and bone fusion after one stage posterior debridement in the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis. However, none-structural bone grafting has rarely been studied. This study was aimed to identify the feasibility of none-structural bone grafting from comparing the advantages and disadvantages with structural bone grafting in the treatment of lumbar spinal tuberculosis. Patients and methods We retrospectively reviewed patients with lumbar spinal tuberculosis who had undergone none-structural (n=27) and structural (n=22) bone grafting after single-stage posterior debridement and instrumentation with at least 24 months of follow-up. Plain radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography scans, as well as health-related outcomes, including Visual Analog Scale for back pain, the Oswestry Disability Index were collated before surgery and at follow-up. Results Both none-structural and structural bone grafting were associated with significant improvements in quality of life parameters, the laboratory tests and the Cobb angle of local kyphosis. A slight loss of Cobb angle correction was in both two groups, without any associated complications. The operation duration and blood loss in none-structural bone grafting group was significantly less. The bone fusion rate was higher in structural bone grafting group. There were three complications in the none-structural bone grafting and four complications in the structural bone grafting group; the incidence of complications between the two groups was not significantly different. Conclusions Based on single-stage posterior debridement and pedicle screws fixation, none-structural bone grafting can achieve anterior column support with reducing surgical trauma, simplifying surgical procedure and decreasing intraoperative hemorrhage, but the lower rate of grafted bone fusion should be taken into consideration when choosing the aforementioned method. Key words Lumbar spinal tuberculous; Single-stage posterior debridement; Anterior column support; Bone fusion; None-structural bone grafting; Structural bone grafting

scholarly journals Spinous Process Combined with a Titanium Mesh Cage as a Bone Graft in the Stability Reconstruction of Lumbar or Lumbosacral Spinal Tuberculosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongqi Zhang ◽  
Lige Xiao ◽  
mingxing Tang ◽  
Guanteng Yang
Keyword(s):  
Operative Time ◽  
Spinous Process ◽  
Spinal Tuberculosis ◽  
Pedicle Screws ◽  
Titanium Mesh ◽  
Bony Fusion ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Posterior Debridement

Abstract Background. To investigate the clinical efficacy of one-stage posterior debridement using the spinous process (SP) combined with titanium mesh cages (TMCs) as interbody grafts for the treatment of single-segment lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis.Methods. From 2010 to 2018, 69 patients who underwent one-stage posterior debridement using grafts and internal fixation within a single lumbar or lumbosacral segment were included in this study. 12 cases using the SP combined with a TMC (SP+TMC, group A), 30 cases using a TMC only (group B), and 27 cases using allografts (group C) were included. Measurements including operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), American Spinal Injury Association Impairment (ASIA) grade, final follow-up (FFU) duration and postoperative complications were recorded. Radiological measurements, including the number of segments fixated, the number of pedicle screws used, the Cobb angle, pelvic parameters, and the bony fusion time, were reviewed. All outcomes were analysed using SPSS 25.Results. We found that group A had fewer fixation segments (1.67±0.64 vs 2.81±0.94, pAC<0.01), fewer pedicle screws implanted (5.05±1.29 vs 6.85±1.37, pAC<0.01), a shorter operative time (166.43±44.11 min vs 205.93±51.73 min, pAC<0.01), reduced blood loss (543.81±230.81 ml vs 803.70±446.78 ml, pAC<0.01), and a strikingly lower hospital cost (14710.42±2354.55$ vs 19260.34±3310.75$, pAC<0.01) than group C.Compared to group B, group A had a lower economic cost (16680.23±3614.73$ vs 14710.42±2354.55$, pAB=0.03). There was no significant difference in bony fusion time among the three groups (8.90 ±2.11 months vs 8.60±2.39 months vs 9.59 ±2.04 months, p>0.01). No significant difference was observed with respect to pre- or postoperative ESR and CRP (p>0.01). There was no significant difference among the 3 groups with respect to the ODI, VAS score or ASIA grade during any period. No differences regarding the hospital stay, rate of complications, loss of PI-LL, correction or loss of Cobb angle were observed among the three groups (p>0.01).Conclusion. Our study demonstrates that compared to a TMC or allograft, the use of the SP combined with a TMC as a bone graft is an effective and reliable approach for the surgical management of one-level lumbar or lumbosacral spinal tuberculosis, leading to good restoration of spinal stability. Furthermore, this approach is an economical structural bone grafting method, especially for patients in developing countries or areas.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document