scholarly journals Assessing Junior Faculty Research Productivity in the IS Field: Recommendations for Promotion and Tenure Standards for Asian Schools

2015 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhuohua Chen ◽  
Chong Gong ◽  
Lihui Lin ◽  
Sean Xu ◽  
Mingyue Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Junior Faculty ◽  
Faculty Research ◽  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Faculty Research Productivity

A New Tool for Identifying Research Standards and Evaluating Research Performance

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 194-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald R. Bacon ◽  
Pallab Paul ◽  
Kim A. Stewart ◽  
Kausiki Mukhopadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Model ◽  
Research Productivity ◽  
Research Performance ◽  
Evaluation Process ◽  
Faculty Research ◽  
Human Judgment ◽  
Faculty Evaluations ◽  
Promotion And Tenure ◽  
Faculty Research Productivity ◽  
Research Standards

Much has been written about the evaluation of faculty research productivity in promotion and tenure decisions, including many articles that seek to determine the rank of various marketing journals. Yet how faculty evaluators combine journal quality, quantity, and author contribution to form judgments of a scholar’s performance is unclear. A mathematical model of faculty judgment is presented that estimates a scholar’s research productivity that is surprisingly consistent with actual faculty evaluations. The model does not replace human judgment in evaluating a scholar’s research performance, but the model enhances clarity and objectivity in the evaluation process. The method is demonstrated with marketing faculty at one university.

Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms?

1984 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 402-418 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.Susan Taylor ◽  
Edwin A. Locke ◽  
Cynthia Lee ◽  
Marilyn E. Gist
Keyword(s):  
Research Productivity ◽  
Type A ◽  
Type A Behavior ◽  
Faculty Research ◽  
Faculty Research Productivity
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document