scholarly journals SOCIAL INNOVATION IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
Andreas Ahrens ◽  
Jeļena Zaščerinska
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Social Innovation ◽  
Practical Knowledge ◽  
Peer Learning ◽  
Shared Knowledge ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Modern Life ◽  
Individual Knowledge

<p>Traditionally, engineering students are provided with new knowledge by educatorstudent interaction based on educator’s academic (social) knowledge or student-student interaction based on their practical (individual) knowledge. That is why engineering students lack the inter-connection between the academic and practical knowledge. However, engineering education should lead to the transformation of students’ knowledge from external (social) to internal (individual) perspective. Social innovation that has become the dominant response to challenges in all the domains of modern life includes peer-learning as the subphase to create socially shared knowledge in the transformation of students’ knowledge from external to internal perspective and Enterprise 3.0 as a component of social media integrated into the teaching and learning process. This allows the novel transformation of students’ knowledge from external to internal perspective, as introduced in this contribution, that proceeds from teaching through peer-learning to learning to be integrated in the environments of engineering education.</p>

Teaching Engineering Ethics in the Classroom

2016 ◽  
pp. 1334-1349
Author(s):  
Josep M. Basart
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Engineering Ethics ◽  
Public Welfare ◽  
Social Responsibilities ◽  
Teaching Responsibilities ◽  
Ethics Courses ◽  
And Training ◽  
Insight Into

Engineering students are introduced to their profession's ethical and social responsibilities along with their education and training at university. This might be the only time and place where public welfare engagement may be promoted by the institution and acknowledged by students. Their future behavior as engineers heavily depends on the understanding and commitment they may develop during this process. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the main points related to the teaching and learning of Engineering Ethics at universities. In order to gain insight into this complex educational scene, a set of questions are formulated and explored. The discussion of these questions amounts to explain what Engineering Education consists of, how to integrate Engineering Ethics courses into the curriculum and develop instructional designs for classroom teaching, who should assume teaching responsibilities, and finally, what Engineering Ethics goals should be. For each query, the primal issues, controversies, and alternatives are discussed.

Epistemology in Engineering Education: An Overview

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurzal Effiyana Ghazali ◽  
Zuraidah Abu Bakar ◽  
Mohd. Shafie Bakar ◽  
Tengku Nur Zulaikha Tengku Malim Busu ◽  
Nor Farahwahidah Abdul Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Education Research ◽  
Engineering Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Developmental Model ◽  
Knowledge Development ◽  
General Context ◽  
Engineering Education Research ◽  
Faculty Management

Epistemology is a branch of philosophy, a study of how a person knows and knowing. Engineering epistemology is one of the new disciplines in engineering education research. Unfortunately, little research has been done on engineering education. In this paper, epistemology is discussed in the general context then, specifically for the engineering education context. Furthermore, the engineering epistemology framework and instrument to investigate engineering epistemology among engineering educators and students have been presented. Theory for knowledge development has been discussed in general and how that developmental model is important for higher education. Finally, epistemology in teaching and learning has been introduced in the context of engineering educators and engineering students. In summary, engineering educators’ epistemology will shape future engineers based on their class design. Therefore, developing engineering students from dualists to commitments of the relativist is very important. Finally, suggestions for engineering faculty management in developing engineering educators and engineering students for a better teaching and learning experience are provided.

Case study of enquiry-based learning designed for rotating magnetic fields in electric machinery course

2017 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liu Huijuan ◽  
Zhang Zhenyang ◽  
Song Tengfei
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Engineering Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Learning Problem ◽  
Rotating Magnetic Fields ◽  
Electric Machinery ◽  
Teachers And Students ◽  
Positive Support

This paper describes a case study of enquiry-based learning to teach problem solving, innovation, group working, and presentation skills for electrical engineering students in electric machinery course at Beijing Jiaotong University. The research project is designed by teachers and students go through three processes: project-based teaching and learning, problem-based derivation and simulation, and enquiry-based presentation. The multidiscipline project is innovated to meet the requirements of engineering education while keeping its traditional effectiveness in driving students to apply knowledge to practice and problem solving. The feedback from students shows positive support for the innovations.

scholarly journals The Role of Applied Mechanics in Bridging the Gaps in Prior Learning for Aspirants of Engineering Education

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 626
Author(s):  
Sarat Singamneni
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
University Education ◽  
First Year ◽  
Applied Mechanics ◽  
Prior Learning ◽  
Scientific Rigor ◽  
Teaching Pedagogies

Building a technology-driven world appears to be the main motivational force behind students choosing to undertake engineering studies. The first year of engineering education plays a significant role in demonstrating sufficient mathematical and scientific rigor to satisfy these motivational factors. The common applied mechanics courses play a central role in achieving this. At the same time, a vast majority of students suffer from a lack of the necessary mathematical skills and analytical orientation for various reasons. Due to different educational philosophies and teaching pedagogies, a lack of proper integration between mathematics and applied mechanics is common. Several efforts were made to build better curriculum, teaching, and learning systems, resulting in widely varied solutions, but most of them require drastically different implementation approaches. With sufficient rigor in teaching and assessment, the first-year applied mechanics (common) courses designed for engineering students can solve students’ mathematical and motivational lapses and help bridge the gaps between pre-university and university education endeavours. This paper presents evidence supporting this argument. In particular, datasets collected from the direct experiences delivering the first-year static and dynamics courses to many students over the past decade and a half are analysed to establish the proposition.

Teaching digital electronics course for electrical engineering students in cognitive domain

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Muhibul Haque Bhuyan ◽  
Sher Shermin Azmiri Khan ◽  
Mohammad Ziaur Rahman
Keyword(s):  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Teaching Method ◽  
Practical Knowledge ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Bloom's Taxonomy ◽  
Cognitive Domain ◽  
Digital Electronics ◽  
Bloom’S Taxonomy ◽  
Teacher Needs

Digital electronics course is one of the very fundamental courses for the students of undergraduate programme of electrical and electronic engineering (EEE) and the other undergraduate engineering disciplines. Therefore, ‘digital electronics’ shall be taught effectively, so that students can apply the knowledge learned to solve their real-life engineering problems. A teacher needs to adopt new teaching methodologies to attract current generation of students, and thus, to prepare them with practical knowledge and skills. Skills in the cognitive domain of Bloom’s taxonomy revolve around knowledge, comprehension and critical thinking of a particular topic. This makes teaching and learning more effective and efficient. In this paper, the teaching method of ‘digital electronics’ course for the undergraduate EEE students in the cognitive domain has been described with an example. Class performance evaluation in two different cohorts shows that the students’ results improve after using this approach.Keywords: Bloom’s taxonomy, cognitive domain, digital electronics course, teaching methods.

scholarly journals ENHANCING ENGINEERING EDUCATION WITH INDIGENOUS CULTURES, PEDAGOGIES, KNOWLEDGES, AND PERSPECTIVES: A SERIES OF FACULTY WORKSHOPS

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jillian Seniuk Cicek ◽  
Afua Mante ◽  
Marcia Friesen ◽  
Randy Herrmann
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Education ◽  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Indigenous Students ◽  
Education Practice ◽  
Indigenous Perspectives ◽  
University Of Manitoba ◽  
Ultimate Objective ◽  
The University

In the Faculty of Engineering at the University of Manitoba, we are committed to creating belonging for Indigenous and non-Indigenous students and faculty by fostering shared values and developing a shared approach to engineering education. In the spirit of this commitment, a team of four from the Faculty of Engineering has been funded to design a series of seven engineering specific faculty workshops to help build good relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous engineering students, faculty, and staff. Our goal is to enrich engineering education by learning how engineering is relevant to Indigenous Peoples from Indigenous perspectives, with the ultimate objective to integrate Indigenous values, knowledges, perspectives, and design principles into engineering teaching and learning in relevant, genuine, and good ways. This Engineering Education Practice Paper presents the design of the seven workshops, and briefly introduces the conceptual framework that guides the team’s approach.  

Teaching Engineering Ethics in the Classroom

2015 ◽  
pp. 144-158
Author(s):  
Josep M. Basart
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Engineering Ethics ◽  
Public Welfare ◽  
Social Responsibilities ◽  
Teaching Responsibilities ◽  
Ethics Courses ◽  
And Training ◽  
Insight Into

Engineering students are introduced to their profession's ethical and social responsibilities along with their education and training at university. This might be the only time and place where public welfare engagement may be promoted by the institution and acknowledged by students. Their future behavior as engineers heavily depends on the understanding and commitment they may develop during this process. The purpose of this chapter is to discuss the main points related to the teaching and learning of Engineering Ethics at universities. In order to gain insight into this complex educational scene, a set of questions are formulated and explored. The discussion of these questions amounts to explain what Engineering Education consists of, how to integrate Engineering Ethics courses into the curriculum and develop instructional designs for classroom teaching, who should assume teaching responsibilities, and finally, what Engineering Ethics goals should be. For each query, the primal issues, controversies, and alternatives are discussed.

scholarly journals Makerspace: Innovation in Mechanical Engineering Education

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-213
Author(s):  
elif bengü
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Undergraduate Curriculum ◽  
Faculty Members ◽  
Graduate Assistants ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Full Effect ◽  
Hands On ◽  
Crucial Part

The complexity of industrial developments requires engineering students to have hands on experience as well as theoretical engineering knowledge. There is a need for a change of classical engineering curriculums. Makerspaces can be a crucial part of this change. They are introduced as physical locations where engineering student’s curiosity is fed and solutions to problems are found through teamwork. Their use in higher education can also provide an opportunity for students to engage in experiential learning. They can develop a large range of soft skills that traditional undergraduate curriculum is unable to provide, such as planning, teamwork, critical thinking and communication. There are still limited studies about the full effect and impact of these spaces in teaching and learning, from the pedagogical perspective. The aim of this study is to determine students’ experiences with such spaces and examine how makerspaces are contributing to their learning. Descriptive research method (one-on-one interviews and normative survey) were used to evaluate students, graduate assistants and a faculty members’ perception of the space and depict the situation. The results of this study showed that students want more than theoretical knowledge from their engineering education. They want to be able to gain hands on experience while they are learning theory. While designing a makerspace for that purpose, the sustainability and the functioning of these spaces should be taken into consideration. The findings of this study can provide guidance for the institutions that are planning to build a makerspace in their campuses.

scholarly journals Pedagogical Implications of Service-Learning Integration in Engineering Education

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 349-357
Keyword(s):  
Service Learning ◽  
Engineering Education ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Practical Knowledge ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Learning Opportunities ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Effective Pedagogy ◽  
Engineering Programme

Today, researchers and engineering educators are much concerned about the future of engineering students who do not receive sufficient practical knowledge about their field and its context. Some criticize the issues related to the use of resources and retention while others feel that the teaching practices in terms of effective pedagogy do not match the required learning strategies and approaches of engineering students. Thus, many educators see service-learning as one of the most crucial solution to several problems and issues that arise in the field of engineering education currently. It has been observed that over the years, the curriculum of engineering education has been subjected to fluctuations. Much work exists that focuses on the theoretical aspects of engineering education but less work has been done on the practical aspects of engineering education. In this paper we assess the potential contributions of service-learning in helping out engineering students in developing the required knowledge and skills which are applicable in the field of engineering. The results showed that integration of service-learning in engineering education was found useful for engineering students in many respects. It was found that integrating service-learning into the engineering programme was offered practical learning opportunities, experiences, contexts, and motivation to engineering students. It was further found that service-learning also promoted the goals of engineering education by engaging engineering students in a real life practical learning which enhanced their capability towards problem solving and critical thinking.

scholarly journals Model-Based Teaching and Learning: An Experiential Research of Teaching Engineering Drawing for First Year Engineering Students

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 9363-9367
Keyword(s):  
Engineering Education ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Control Group ◽  
First Year ◽  
Continuous Assessment ◽  
Engineering Drawing ◽  
Context Model ◽  
Model Based

Technology plays a major role in the easement of teaching and learning in engineering education. Novel techniques adopted in the recent days, have resulted in a huge success on the part of educators. These techniques create a great difference in the instructional delivery, with real-time impact on the understanding and learning of students. In this context, Model Based Teaching and Learning (MBTL) is identified as one such resourceful method to teach certain educational concepts which require imagination. Use of models within the pedagogy of engineering education promotes meta cognitive thinking skills of students. The purpose of this research was to examine the advantages of adopting model – based teaching and learning for the course, Engineering Drawing for first year engineering students. A class of 120 Engineering students during the second semester participated in the research. The students were randomly grouped into two groups of each 60 in order to receive different treatments. The first group was identified as the Control group (CG) which was taught concepts of Engineering Drawing using traditional lecture method, while the second group, the Experimental Group (EG) was facilitated with models related to projection of lines and orthographic projections. The results revealed that using models had a significant impact on the academic achievement of the students. Based on their performance in the continuous assessment, it was concluded that models were very helpful in improving the marks, and also played an effective role in the comprehension of concepts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document