Microleakage of Ormocer-based Restorative Material in Primary Teeth: An In Vivo Study

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Saad AL-Harbi ◽  
Najat Farsi
Keyword(s):  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Cavity Wall ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Restorative Material ◽  
Dye Penetration

This in vivo study aimed to compare, by means of dye penetration, the microleakage values of an Ormocerbased material (Admira) and a commonly-used composite resin (Restorative Z-100) and to assess the differences in the degree of microleakage according to the cavity wall location for both tested materials. No statistically significant differences were found in the degree of microleakage between the 2 materials or the location of cavity walls. Additional preventive measures should be considered to minimize leakage since none of the restorative systems used, eliminated microleakage.

Efficacy of new chemomechanical caries removal agent compared with conventional method in primary teeth: An in vivo study

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
NB Nagaveni ◽  
NB Radhika ◽  
TS Satisha ◽  
KS Ashwini ◽  
Sridhar Neni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conventional Method ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Caries Removal

Clinical Evaluation of Caries Removal in Primary Teeth Using Carie-care and SmartPrep Burs: An In vivo Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
PoojaRavindra Shivasharan ◽  
AKatge Farhin ◽  
MayurManohar Wakpanjar ◽  
Ashveeta Shetty
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Caries Removal

Comparative evaluation of formocresol and electrosurgical pulpotomy in human primary teeth- An in vivo study

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kritika Gupta ◽  
VinayBal Singh Thakur ◽  
Nitika Gupta ◽  
Archana Sharma ◽  
Atika Mahajan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
In Vivo Study

scholarly journals In Vivo study of an intracanal dressing of calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine in necrotic primary teeth

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Oliveira Gondim ◽  
José Jeová Siebra Moreira Neto ◽  
Débora Aline Silva Gomes ◽  
Elcilaine Rizzato Azevedo ◽  
Fabiano Jeremias ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Hydroxide ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
In Vivo Study

scholarly journals ASSESSMENT OF THE PERFORMANCE OF PAPAIN BASED GEL IN CARIES REMOVAL FROM PRIMARY TEETH – AN IN VIVO STuDY

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 1377-1384
Author(s):  
Manar Soliman ◽  
Noha Kabil ◽  
Reham Abou El Fadl
Keyword(s):  
Primary Teeth ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Caries Removal

scholarly journals Efficacy of Two Methods for Restorative Materials’ Removal in Primary Teeth

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 372-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Gonçalves Bittar ◽  
Christiana Murakami ◽  
Daniela Hesse ◽  
José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato ◽  
Fausto Medeiros Mendes
Keyword(s):  
High Speed ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Primary Molars ◽  
Restorative Material ◽  
Tooth Structure ◽  
Restorative Materials ◽  
Structural Loss ◽  
Composite Resin Restorations ◽  
Amalgam Restorations

ABSTRACT Aim This in vitro study aimed to compare the time required for removal, the presence of residues of restorative material, tooth structure loss and dental surface morphology after removal of composite resin and amalgam restorations from occlusal cavities in primary molars using conventional high-speed bur and CVDentus® ultrasonic diamond tips. Materials and methods A total of 37 primary molars were allocated into four groups: Group 1 (n=9)—amalgam restorations removed using high-speed bur; Group 2 (n=10)—amalgam restorations removed using ultrasonic tip; Group 3 (n=8)— composite resin restorations removed using high-speed bur; Group 4 (n=10)—composite resin restorations removed using ultrasonic tip. After being restored, teeth were sectioned and analyzed through stereoscopic microscope images before and after restoration removal. The structural loss was analyzed by software of image analysis, and an examiner assessed for the presence of residues. Scanning electron microscopy was used to evaluate the morphology. Time and structural loss values were compared using ANOVA, and the percentages of samples with residues using Fisher test. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the tooth structure loss among different methods and restorative materials, as well as in the presence of residues of restorative material. However, diamond burs were faster than the ultrasonic method for both materials. Differences in dental morphology were observed between the methods of restoration removal, but not related to the restorative material. Conclusion Both conventional high-speed bur and ultrasonic diamond tip methods remove similar amounts of tooth structure, but the removal performed with diamond tips in ultrasonic devices is slower. Clinical significance This study shows that both ultrasonic and conventional high-speed bur methods for removing restorations generate similar loss of sound dental tissue, but the former is slower. How to cite this article Bittar DG, Murakami C, Hesse D, Imparato JCP, Mendes FM. Efficacy of Two Methods for Restorative Materials’ Removal in Primary Teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(5):372-378.

Accuracy of Root ZX apex locator in primary teeth with different root canal irrigants: An in vivo study

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
IE Neena ◽  
NM Roshan ◽  
R Basavanna ◽  
NB Nagaveni ◽  
P Poornima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
In Vivo Study ◽  
Root Canal Irrigants
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document