Efficacy of new chemomechanical caries removal agent compared with conventional method in primary teeth: An in vivo study

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 52 ◽  
Author(s):  
NB Nagaveni ◽  
NB Radhika ◽  
TS Satisha ◽  
KS Ashwini ◽  
Sridhar Neni ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
PoojaRavindra Shivasharan ◽  
AKatge Farhin ◽  
MayurManohar Wakpanjar ◽  
Ashveeta Shetty

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 1377-1384
Author(s):  
Manar Soliman ◽  
Noha Kabil ◽  
Reham Abou El Fadl

2012 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariya R Bohari ◽  
Yusuf K Chunawalla ◽  
Bijle Mohammed Nadeem Ahmed

ABSTRACT Aim To evaluate four different techniques of caries excavation in primary teeth in terms of efficacy, efficiency and pain experienced during the procedure. Materials and methods Sample of 120 teeth from children aged 5 to 9 years were equally divided into 4 groups – Air rotor (group A), Carisolv (group B), Papacarie (group C) and Er:YAG laser (group D). Visual and tactile criteria along with DIAGNOdent pen value was used to evaluate efficacy. Time was recorded to determine efficiency and FLACC scale was used to assess the pain experienced. Results Air rotor and laser were more effective and efficient method whereas laser and CMCR methods were more comfortable methods. Conclusion Laser irradiation and CMCR methods are comparable to conventional methods in terms of effectiveness and are less painful methods. Clinical significance Newer techniques of CMCR and laser irradiation of dentinal caries are minimally invasive methods and are less painful and thus should be more frequently employed in pediatric dentistry. How to cite this article Bohari MR, Chunawalla YK, Ahmed BMN. Clinical Evaluation of Caries Removal in Primary Teeth using Conventional, Chemomechanical and Laser Technique: An in vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(1):40-47.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kritika Gupta ◽  
VinayBal Singh Thakur ◽  
Nitika Gupta ◽  
Archana Sharma ◽  
Atika Mahajan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 92 ◽  
pp. 103264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jana Schmidt ◽  
Laura Buenger ◽  
Sandra Krohn ◽  
René Kallies ◽  
Katharina Zeller ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliana Oliveira Gondim ◽  
José Jeová Siebra Moreira Neto ◽  
Débora Aline Silva Gomes ◽  
Elcilaine Rizzato Azevedo ◽  
Fabiano Jeremias ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
IE Neena ◽  
NM Roshan ◽  
R Basavanna ◽  
NB Nagaveni ◽  
P Poornima ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Saad AL-Harbi ◽  
Najat Farsi

This in vivo study aimed to compare, by means of dye penetration, the microleakage values of an Ormocerbased material (Admira) and a commonly-used composite resin (Restorative Z-100) and to assess the differences in the degree of microleakage according to the cavity wall location for both tested materials. No statistically significant differences were found in the degree of microleakage between the 2 materials or the location of cavity walls. Additional preventive measures should be considered to minimize leakage since none of the restorative systems used, eliminated microleakage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document