Marital functioning and communication in a clinical sample of social anxiety disorder clients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kircia Marie Casten
2006 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-405 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke T. Schultz ◽  
Richard G. Heimberg ◽  
Thomas L. Rodebaugh ◽  
Franklin R. Schneier ◽  
Michael R. Liebowitz ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-396
Author(s):  
Sonja Skocic ◽  
Henry Jackson ◽  
Carol Hulbert ◽  
Christina Faber

Background: Clark and Wells' (1995) cognitive model of social anxiety (CWM) explains the maintenance of social anxiety and has been used as a guide for treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD). Few studies have examined the components of the model together across different samples. Aims: This study had two distinct aims: to test the components of CWM and to examine how the variables of CWM may differ between clinical and non-clinical samples with varying levels of social anxiety. Method: Hypothesized relationships between three groups (i.e. a clinical sample of individuals diagnosed with SAD (ClinS), n = 40; socially anxious students (HSA), n = 40; and, non-anxious students (LSA), n = 40) were investigated. Results: Four out of five CWM variables tested were able to distinguish between highly socially anxious and non-anxious groups after controlling for age and depression. Conclusions: CWM variables are able to distinguish between high and low levels of social anxiety and are uniquely related to social anxiety over depression.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Ariella P. Lenton-Brym ◽  
Olivia Provost-Walker ◽  
Virginia Tsekova ◽  
Randi E. McCabe ◽  
Karen Rowa

Abstract Background: Post-event processing (PEP) is an important maintenance factor of social anxiety disorder (SAD). This study examined psychometric properties of the Positive Beliefs about Post-Event Processing Questionnaire (PB-PEPQ; Fisak & Hammond, 2013), which measures metacognitive beliefs about PEP. Method: Participants receiving treatment for SAD (n = 71) and other anxiety and related disorders (n = 266) completed self-report questionnaires at several timepoints. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis did not support the PB-PEPQ's proposed unidimensional model. Subsequent exploratory factor analysis yielded a three-factor structure consisting of engaging in PEP to (1) review negative events (Negative scale), (2) review positive events (Positive scale), and (3) better understand one's social anxiety (Understand scale). Within the SAD subsample, PB-PEPQ scales demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.83–0.85) and test–retest reliability (r = 0.65–0.78). Convergent and criterion validity of the PB-PEPQ Negative scale were supported. PB-PEPQ scale scores were significantly higher within the SAD group, as compared with the other groups (generalised anxiety disorder, panic disorder and agoraphobia, posttraumatic stress disorder, and obsessive-compulsive disorder), supporting the scales’ discriminative validity. Conclusion: Findings support the reliability and validity of the PB-PEPQ in a clinical sample and reveal the measure's multifactorial structure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 128 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brianne L. Glazier ◽  
Lynn E. Alden

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document